Clear Full Forecast

Treaty Failure Topic of Special Meeting

By 250 News

Thursday, August 30, 2007 04:09 AM

There will be a special meeting for the Lheidli T’enneh and those who were on the list of eligible voters for the treaty ratification vote.

On September 23rd, the Lheidli T’enneh will have a special assembly at the Civic Centre in Prince George.

“We will be talking about the review of the ratification vote failure” says Marvin George, one of the Treaty Negotiators.

He wants to wait until the assembly to share the full details of what the review uncovered, but will say that at the time the Treaty ratification failed there was a great deal of speculation that  there were “misconceptions” about the contents of the Treaty.  “The problem was with the process, not the treaty content” says George.

The September meeting will offer a chance to discuss those misconceptions, but he says those who attend will not be asked to decide if the Lheidli T’enneh should hold another vote on the same package.  “We hope to put that question before the Lheidli T’enneh in October, and if we are given a mandate of 50% plus one, we would hold another vote before March.”

The City of Prince George, Regional District of Fraser fort George, Province of B.C. and The Federal Government have agreed to hold all lands that were part of the Treaty package until the end of March 2008.

Right now, the Lheidli T’enneh are putting together information packages that will be delivered to all Lheidli T’enneh in Shelley and confirming mailing addresses of those  who live elsewhere so they too can receive  the packages.

The Assembly on September 23rd will start with registration at 9:00 a.m. the meeting gets underway at 10:00 a.m.

    
Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

March 2008. I sure hope that is the date when the land freeze actually comes off. Lots of people are willing to pick up the land that was set aside to give the Indians.
This is so political,it is sickening
How many times have we seen this done?
If someone doesn't like the reults of the vote,bring it back again...and again, until you get what you want.
Throw in some more retoric and spin and maybe you can shove it through next time.
Now that really is democracy isn't it?
Well, George says:"The problem was with the process, not the treaty content.”

Perhaps it isn't such a bad thing to have another vote on the same treaty using a more informed process that is free of misconceptions.

It's their business, anyways. If they think they have more information now and a clear understanding then, by all means, it is a good thing that they may decide to revisit the whole thing and have another go at it, in my opinion.

That's why building in a time period for re-consideration was a pretty good idea.

It will be their democratic decision that will count, and nothing else.

It will be a final kick at this version of the Treaty.

Democracy in action.



Keep voting til we get what we want. Gadzooks! I thought that only happens in Quebec.
"Keep voting til we get what we want."

As opposed to voting once, not getting what you want, and bitchin' on opinion 250 ....

;-)

Welcome back Owl...
:-)