Clear Full Forecast

Report from Parliament's Hill: August 30th

By Prince George - Peace River M.P. Jay Hill

Thursday, August 30, 2007 03:44 AM

Conservative Environmental Plan Gets the Green Light

An interesting thing happened this week in the world of politics and journalism.  While still attempting to weigh all sides of the debate concerning Canada’s plan to preserve our environment, the major national media outlets didn’t pull any punches concerning the hollow rhetoric of the opposition parties, particularly the latest threats by Liberal Leader Stéphane Dion.

Even the Globe & Mail, which typically falls on the opposite side of the Conservative Government in ANY debate, reserved its editorial section to acknowledge the Conservative Government’s brutal accuracy on why Canada cannot meet its original Kyoto targets.  At the same time it condemned Mr. Dion’s environmental record and his empty criticism of the Conservative response to Kyoto.                                  

Citing Mr. Dion’s “sad predictability”, the Globe & Mail’s editorial board went on to say that his statements about bringing down the minority government this fall if the opposition parties’ redrafted version of the Clean Air Act does not pass, is an “unfortunate threat” that ignores the reality that “aiming for Kyoto now would be a nightmare”.

As Mark Jaccard, a professor of resources and environmental management at Simon Fraser University has pointed out, “you would have to destroy one-third of the buildings and equipment in your economy in the next four years to meet the Kyoto target.”

Mr. Dion’s latest remarks, following his bizarre claims of secret conspiracy theories to sell Canada’s water, were prompted by our Government’s official response to Bill C-288, a Liberal private member’s bill the opposition parties pushed through Parliament as a political statement.  C-288 seeks to bind Canada to its original Kyoto targets.  However, it is not a money bill.  The federal government cannot spend a single cent to implement the act, making it toothless. 

Nevertheless, our Government has respected the law by filing the necessary response.

Under Kyoto, Canada’s target is to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions to 563 megatonnes per year by 2012.  However, in 2005, after emissions steadily climbed, Canada’s emissions sat at 747 megatonnes and rising.  The only way to make up the 200-megatonne-plus gap is to invoke severe economic consequences that would profoundly affect the quality of life of every Canadian.

As the Globe & Mail cautions, “no one should forget that emissions rose steadily under the former Liberal government, year after year, despite its Kyoto vows.”  It also calls the opposition parties’ revised clean air bill “simply too bureaucratic and unwieldy”.

In contrast, the Conservative Government has taken immediate action by implementing, for the first time in history, mandatory targets on industry so that greenhouse gases will register absolute reductions in just three years and air pollution will be cut in half just eight years from now.  We’ve also implemented a chemicals management plan and invested heavily in helping industry and consumers access new energy technologies and renewable energy.

And our Government continues to work cooperatively with our international partners to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and reach a post-2012 commitment for the second phase of Kyoto.  A Kyoto that we believe should include all major emitting countries.

The Conservative environmental plan is based upon reality and fact.  And that’s why it is already producing real results.

    
Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Gee, absolutely no response to last weeks comments about the selling off of Canadian independence. What a surprise! I guess the politicians expect us to forget the past and only deal with the current. This is a mistake and will be rewarded in the next election.
You don't expect him to actually read what us peons write, do you?

Once again his report from Parliament is nothing more than a partisan attack against another party.
If you have a question for him send him a letter, I'm sure he's got better things to do than surfing the web looking for posts people have left asking him questions.
Some years ago I sent him two polite letters which were ignored by him and his office.

Therefore, he will not be contacted by me again, thank you.
Ammonra, right on! An attack on another party is far more convenient than attacking the real cause for the huge increase in Canada's total green house emissions: The combustion of vast amounts of natural gas in Alberta (Conservative Alberta!) to produce heat for the extraction of heavy crude from the Alberta tar sands! The increase in emissions during the Liberal years and since Kyoto are directly related to the mining of the tar sands in Alberta!

Why do they want to build a nuclear plant in Alberta? Because then they can export the natural gas AND the oil to our friends south of the border who still believe that a person's status in life depends on the largest number of horsepower under the hood of their huge inefficient chariots!



Once again, Jay is just doing his job, which is to try to get re-elected. The question is why St. Ben isn't doing his job, which is to be independent. Is he trying to help Jay do his job? Just like he's trying to help Shirley, John and Pat?
Once again, Jay is just doing his job, which is to try to get re-elected. The question is why St. Ben isn't doing his job, which is to be independent. Is he trying to help Jay do his job? Just like he's trying to help Shirley, John and Pat?
I was under the perhaps mistaken impression that Hill's job was to represent the concerns of his riding constituents in Ottawa!

Of course, you say his job is just trying to get re-elected and that may just explain why he writes his reports the way he does.

St. Ben? How does religion (a saint) enter into the picture here?

The first and foremost mission of a Political Party once it gets elected, is to lay the groundwork to get re-elected. Getting elected is what politics is all about, everything else is secondary.

Its easy to blame the Americans and their big cars, and the oil sands in Alta for global warming, however this is simply a case of the pot calling the kettle black.

We have sufficient big cars and trucks in this area that add to the pollution, and we certainly do our part with the Pulp Mills, Refineries, Chemical Plants, Saw
mills, Planer Mills, etc; Not to forget the thousands of people in this town that drive around all day long shopping and star gazing, because to drive to and fro is a form of entertainment.

Per capita we are probably worse pollutors than those we accuse.
Canada's population is about equal to that of Greater Tokyo.

Now, if all of us Canadians were squeezed into an area the size of Tokyo (or California!) and with a much warmer climate we wouldn't pollute as much *per capita* as we do now, that is for sure.

Our climate is colder, we need to keep warm, we must drive long distances to get from one city to the next, all our imports and exports, groceries and basic necessities need to be trucked/transported much longer distances. All that takes additional energy.

Of course, a Japanese factory that makes digital cameras doesn't pollute as much *per capita* as a Canadian one that produces aluminum.

The *per capita* thing is just a statistic and we all know how subjective statistics are and can be. How about *adjusting* per capita numbers for crucial factors, such as climate and distances?

The Alberta tar sands are being exploited in order to send the extracted oil south, where it is needed most, in a country that has only 5% of the world's population but consumes more than one third of the world's annually produced energy and resources.

The kettle there is a heck of a lot blacker than our little pot here.

That doesn't mean that we don't have to do our part and reduce our emissions by the adoption of cleaner technologies and less consumption of non-renewable resources.
It's easy to be critical. The posts above pretty well identify some of the major polluters in PG and area.

So, let's pretent each of you are now in Jay's position as a Federal Representative Member of Parliament for Prince George. What would you do and where would you start?

Keep in mind that you have no support from the other parties and minimal support from the media. How would you approach things? Chester
It's easy to blame the media. All politicians do so, all the time. Forget about *support* from the media. Do a better job and the media will respond positively.

Support from the other parties? One will not get much support if one continuously bashes them for their (different) approach.

So, first of all one should change one's attitude and become more co-operative, since basically we all want the same thing: Less pollution and a cleaner environment.

Next, honestly identify where the pollution comes from, where it has been increasing the most and what can be done about it.

Don't whitewash for political convenience.

Take the pollution bull by the horns. Don't worry day and night about getting re-elected!

Just do the job!

Cheers!