Clear Full Forecast

Report From Parliament's Hill: September 27th

By Prince George - Peace River M.P. Jay Hill

Thursday, September 27, 2007 03:45 AM

 Another Election?  Mr. Dion, you have another option!

In the aftermath of their disappointing results in last week’s Quebec by-elections, the Liberal Party of Canada and the Bloc Quebecois have gone into panic mode.  Unfortunately for Canadians, this means the opposition parties are threatening to prompt a federal election.  Something the electorate simply doesn’t want.

For the Bloc and their leader Gilles Duceppe this is really no surprise.  The separatists are always delivering ultimatums.  We expect them to act irresponsibly since their entire purpose is to destroy the country.

After the Conservative Party of Canada took a seat from the Bloc in the heart of sovereigntist territory, Mr. Duceppe made five demands he says must be met in the upcoming Speech from the Throne or else he will bring down the Conservative government, triggering a general election.  Given the decline of separatism in Quebec, Mr. Duceppe likely figures he has little to lose by this show of political bravado.

As for the Liberals, it appears the knives are being sharpened yet again as that party re-launches its trademark blood-sport of ‘knock-off-the-leader’.  Just as Paul Martin’s supporters worked tirelessly for years behind the scenes to oust Jean Chrétien, supporters of failed leadership candidates Michael Ignatieff, Bob Rae and Gerard Kennedy were drooling at the prospect of deposing Liberal Leader Stépane Dion before the results of the Quebec by-elections were even tallied.

With their complete shut-out, including a devastating loss to the New Democrats in the Liberal bastion of Outremont, and despite the strong likelihood their party would lose seats, there are a good many Liberals who welcome a general election as a vehicle for Mr. Dion’s political demise.

The reality is that the determination for whether there is a general election lies mostly with the Liberals as the Official Opposition.  The New Democrats simply don’t have the numbers to be a factor and besides, they have even less to lose than the Bloc. 

The underlying myth in this debate about whether there will be an election this fall is that the Conservative Government must attract the support of at least one of the opposition parties to survive.  They’re wrong.  There is another option.

Conservatives set an historical precedent when we abstained from voting on the Liberal’s 2005 budget, allowing Paul Martin’s minority government to survive.  At that time, our leader Stephen Harper said there were many aspects of that budget we fundamentally couldn’t vote to support.  Yet, we respected the will of Canadians which strongly indicated they didn’t want an election.

Mr. Dion, as leader of the Official Opposition, could take the same, responsible course of action now.  Canada’s economy is performing very well.  Unemployment is at its lowest in 32 years.  Taxes are down. Consumer spending remains robust and Canada is regaining its good reputation on the international stage thanks to the strong and decisive leadership of Prime Minister Harper.

Instructing his Liberal caucus to abstain from the vote on the Throne Speech is a lifeline that Mr. Dion may wish to grasp … and, more importantly, one that will save Canadians from an unwanted, unnecessary and expensive trip to the polls.

 


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

I want an election...
maybe you will lose your cushy job and have to go out in the cold and work ....
aw.....
If it had not been for the many years of efforts of then Finance Minister Paul Martin to put Canada back on its financial track, balancing the budget for seven consecutive years (after 9 years of Brian Mulroney deficits - one in particular exceeding 60 Billion dollars) Mr. Harper's government would not have any surpluses to celebrate today.

It would be busy raising our taxes and trying to figure out how to service the enormously ballooned national debt.

Politics apparently must always consist of taking credit for the things one shouldn't take credit for and ignoring the things that one should take responsibility for - thereby keeping voters in the dark like mushrooms and feeding them their regular dose of steer manure, otherwise known as b.s.



The all tend to alter the truth to suit themselves...
I will stop short of saying they lie, but the truth they spew is a long way from...THE TRUTH
An alteration of the truth (in politics) is called a spin.

The facts are massaged and manipulated to fit the occasion.

If that doesn't accomplish the goal one can always rely on voter amnesia or retreat into the face saving fog of fuzzification.

I wouldn't be surprised if they had seminars where the basic principles are taught until they have them down pat.

Either that or they are born with a gift for it.

Fun and games to them, frustration for us.



Yep, Paul Martin was a disappointment as Prime Minister, but as Finance Minster, he saved this country from the disasters known as Mulroney and Kim Campbell. Of course, Mulroney inherited a complete mess, but he was hired to make it better and not worse, which he did.

I wonder if the next Liberal Prime Minister would be able to get Frank Stronach or someone of similar business intellect to run Finance.

Almost anybody would be better than Flaherty the yokel. He and his buddy Mike Harris damaged Ontario and he sure isn't doing anything federally that's useful.
Mike Harris was bad for Ontario? Ya ,he pissed off the civil service, but they don't run the province and needed to be put in place. mission accoplished. His take over of Ontario, and fixing 8 years of NDP BS, is very similar to Campbels in BC. NDP's are not meant to govern. period.
I think history will record Flaherty favourably....
I don't know why he is addressing Dion here. I doubt Dion is reading this site.
"As for the Liberals, it appears the knives are being sharpened yet again as that party re-launches its trademark blood-sport of ‘knock-off-the-leader’."

As opposed to the trademark of the conservatives? Knock off the party? Who is talking here? Reform? Progressive Conservative?
I knew who Martin was when he was Minister of Finance. Who is this Flaherty fellow and what does he do?
Hill: "As for the Liberals, it appears the knives are being sharpened yet again as that party re-launches its trademark blood-sport of ‘knock-off-the-leader’."

This ‘knock-off-the-leader’ talk reminds me of how Mr. Stockwell Day was yanked around after having been duly and democratically elected (by the party members!) as party leader.

Dow7500, I agree with your comment about the rescue of Ontario from the mis-management of the Rae period.

Aha, I see the Liberal/NDP cheering squad has arrived!

At first I used to find you folks annoying, the way you fall all over yourselves trying to attack the conservatives (and MP Hill personally) in any way you can.

If Hill made the statement "the sky is blue" then minutes later you'd be on this board posting "no it's not, it's sometimes black...at night, and don't forget about sunset...it's orange! This is part of the Conservatives hidden agenda to convince us all is blue skies and cheery when it's not...squawk...hidden agenda...squawk..polly wants a cracker...hidden agenda.....squawk!"

It's actually quite amusing now.

Yes, MP Hill is guilty of spin, he's a politician, that's what politicians do, but you group are just as bad. Almost everything you post is spin too!
Although "Report From Parliament's Hill" lacks substance, it certainly has some amusing aspects to it.

So, it is not a complete loss after all.
actually, this morning, the sky is more of a grey ......

I really do not think the agenda is hidden at all .......

The party in power is always perfect in their musings to the people they represent. They HAVE to think positive, speak positive, act positive .....

And the parties in opposition have to do the opposite ....

That is the way of the political world.

Then we have the political people in the population who are identical to the politicians ... they mimic them to a T ... no matter who is in power, they stick to the party they have decided to adopt for life. .....

Those are the ones, in my opinion, who add nothing to the discussion ..... they are the real parrots, parroting THEIR party's every move.

Those who are independant problem solvers, who can see through spin and will support those who make sense to them, no matter what the political stripe of the politician, those are the people I admire.

They are, in fact, the swing voters, the ones who decide at every election which party will get in.
"We expect them to act irresponsibly since their entire purpose is to destroy the country."

That is rather a harsh statement. Accusing a party of wanting to destroy a country. I happen to think that is an irresponsible statement no matter who the MP is that says it. Perhaps he would like to get the RCMP to arrest the entire party and charge them with treason.

I can just see it in the constitution of the Party "our purpose is to destroy Canada" .....

Utter nonesense written by someone who ought to know better.
"Canada is regaining its good reputation on the international stage thanks to the strong and decisive leadership of Prime Minister Harper."

That really depends on which part of the international stage one thinks we ought to stand. If it is the USA that directs the paly, then yes. If it is most others who direct the action on the stage, then it is more likely a no.

And, of course, we must remember that who really counts is the people in Canada. Where do we want to be on that international stage.

Since he is quoting what Canadians want with respect to an election at this time, then he conveniently forgets that those same people don't want to be involved any longer in a war in Afghanistan.

So, as is normal for any party, he and his party listen only to the people of the country when it fits their agenda, hidden or not. They really do not give a shit for the wishes of the people who put them in power.

It is called the arrogance of power. Hill displays it time and time again.
So, now to the real heart of the matter. Why do the Conservatives not want an election? If they are so hot, they ought to win hands down. One party wants to destroy Canada, another has a useless leader and is in panic mode, and the third really never has had a chance to get enough votes to get into power and most people discount them as a result.

Now is the time to make the move. And don't give me the political answer that they can govern as is and they don't want to disturb Canadians who are about to go into hibernation for the winter.
The President of Afghanistan is offering the Taliban an olive branch, cooperation and participation in the government! (CBC News, today).

Imagine that! Karzai seems to know what is best for his country - including partnership with the enemy we are fighting!

Now is the perfect time to wrap up Canada's involvement, bring the troops home and listen to what the majority wants.

Mr. Harper, what are you going to do now?

Oh, I forget, he can't do a thing unless he has the Decider's approval...