Clear Full Forecast

Miller-Connaught Residents Signing Up

By 250 News

Thursday, October 04, 2007 03:59 AM

    

Standing room only  at the open house Tuesday to talk about the Friendship Lodge

Miller-Connaught residents continue their opposition to the proposed Friendship Lodge.

The majority of residents who attended a public meeting at Ron Brent Elementary School Tuesday evening were loud and clear about their opposition, and they signed their names to a petition which now carries some 400 signatures.  The petition  says  they do not want the  30 unit transitional housing  facility for those with issues of homelessness, mental illness or drug addiction. 

They expressed concerns about the process, convinced that although B.C.  Housing has promised there would be public consultation, that the meetings with the public now are simply token sessions that will   result in nothing more than a check mark on the process “to-do” list.

“You do not put an AA meeting in the back of the bar”, says one resident, who  says the location for  this kind of facility would be better in the  area south of Queensway  off 3rd or 4th Avenues.  She says it would still be close to “services” but far enough away from schools and a residential neighbourhood.

One of the people who had worked on the Official Community Plan (which will need to be revised to allow the Lodge to be constructed) attended the Tuesday night session and was concerned about the petition.  “I don’t think  the petition can be considered valid as I think many people  may  have signed their name thinking they were signing the  ‘sign-in’ sheet, I think people  were confused.”  The rest of the folks in that room made it clear, they were NOT confused, they rumbled that they knew exactly what they were signing.  They made it clear, their petition is valid.

BC Housing purchased the property without that sale being conditional on rezoning.  Louise Elms of BC Housing said if the rezoning is not approved, the Province can, and will, sell the property.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Well stop with all this crap about the proposed site being too close to the 'bad areas of town', then suggesting that the site gets moved to downtown!!! Why not just be honest and say "we don't give a hoot about where these people go, as long as they are not near my house". I'd rather people were honest with their objection, which is that the best place for the potential new residents to live is on a barge in the middle of the ocean, where we don't have to look at them or think about them.
I am opposed to this proposed facility being placed in a neighbourhood that is saturated already. The close proximity to other facilities including McQuaid Place will be detrimental to a once classified "ideal neighbourhood to live".

As the city works very hard to remove it's problems away from the downtown it becomes apparent that tax paying citizens will not be heard when they voice their concerns.

This facility will impact all of Prince George, not just the residents of the Millar Connaught area. The facility will be at the intersection of the main route to Fort George Park. Is this an ideal location with Queensway being a main thoroughfare? No.

Other facilities are required to have the appropriate number of parking stalls for their businesses and facilities. This facility is only looking at parking for staff. How will this affect the area?

Homeless people as specified are not necessarily all on foot.

May other issues come to mind, however I must remind you that in the heat of the moment all those in support only think of "NIMBY". What about businesses and the economic impact?

Support for this facility seems to be from those in positions associated with Social Services, Politicians and City Employees/Counsel and not Business owners and cititens.

Listen to the residents.

Many thanks to Ben Meisner for your support. You are greatly appreciated by those that have been long time residents and tax paying citizens/residents of the Millar Connaught neighbourhoods.

Heidi
Anyone who does NOT live in the area surrounding the Backpacker Motel probably has very little understanding of how the residents actually feel.
How could they?
That being the case,they really can't comment on whether they are right or wrong for objecting to this kind of a faciltiy.
I don't live there but I do know the area well and it does NOT need this!
I can understand how it affects them and how it could affect property values and their quality of life,peace of mind,etc.
I don't blame them one damn bit for being up in arms over this.
City Council needs to remember those residents are taxpayers and they DO deserve better!!
I support helping those in need as I am sure the residents in the area do also,but this is NOT the way to go about it.
There HAS to be a better way, and the entire concept needs a major re-think.
The drunk guy in the dirty ball-cap and wife-beater T yelling at the top his lungs at the meeting on Tuesday summed it up best:

The residents don't want an attractive, safe and supervised housing development in their 'community'.
lol
Well said, Moses.
Just imagine the righteous indignation if they really did try to set this type of thing up in the "shangri-la" of College Heights. The uproar would be deafening.
If they tried this in College Heights there would be a hanging!
There has been a halfway house full of convicts in the downtown bowels (not bowl)of PG near the courthouse for many years. Seems there is no reason why they can't put a transitional housing facility in that part of town either. Keep it away from the millar addition. The renegades club house being there is bad enough already.
There IS a long-term mental health facility in College Heights.
Cool
I think people should have more compassion for the areas of town that have been saturated with the Cities problems and more concerned about the saftey of the children and seniors in the area. Yes, Buzz, we are being honest, we have had enough. We want our neighbourhood back. You should have seen the seniors that came out to that meeting. Just ask the big guy from the friendship center that was kind enough to give up his seat to a elderly lady that could hardly walk but wanted to show her support. We made sure she got home O.K. To add insult to injury the Citizen has an online Poll going on What is the best site for a supported housing complex in prince George. I don't think you will have a lot of seniors responding and thats what is so unfair about this whole mess.
Here is a link to information now appearing on the City of Prince George web site regarding Friendship Lodge proposal.

http://www.city.pg.bc.ca/pages/oldbackpacker/index.html
BTW - Millar Addition pretty much IS downtown. The Croft is less than a 10 minute stagger. This hardly constitutes "de-centralizing" services.