Clear Full Forecast

Are we about to be had... again?

By Ben Meisner

Friday, May 20, 2005 05:00 AM

If I can offer up a suggestion to Premier Gordon Campbell it is that he take the last agreement between the Province and Alcan to bed  and read it over very carefully . When he is finished, he will find two things killed his two MLA's (Roger Harris and Bill Belsey) out west in Skeena and the North Coast . First, the economy of the region  is in the toilet (in large measure because of Alcan) and secondly,  the fact the provincial government is prepared to give the company 50 million dollars to build a cold water release on the Nechako. We have been had so many times in dealing with Alcan that even the ladies of the night on Queesway are envious. The agreement signed by the Province under Glen Clark and Paul Ramsey indeed says the Province will pony up 50 million for a cold water release and Alcan 50 million. It also asks that the Federal Government be encouraged to contribute 50 million.  That would bring the total to 150 million, and that's how much the Fed's once said it would cost. One wonders aloud, if the project does go ahead with just two contributing to the pot  (Ottawa's already said it had a deal whereby Alcan paid all of it so why would we want something different) just what will it cost the people of this province?  Hold it for a moment , consider this  Mr. Premier, just how much tax has Alcan paid in British Columbia?  They paid 200 million in all of  Canada, but neglected to tell everyone that amount includes taxes paid by its employees. So just how much did we receive by way of taxes from this company? It's estimated they paid 10-15 million and we're offering 50 million? The bigger issue Mr. Campbell   is that little section in the contract which says Alcan must bring its mill up to full operating capacity . They haven't lived up to the terms of that contract and you're busy handing out our money while the layoffs continue willy-nilly?  Write them a letter, tell them to live up to the agreement.  After all, they are getting over 160 million a year in power sales which is what this is all about.  Ask them just how much of that 160 million is profit?  Where has that money been going?  It sure isn't in our provincial piggy bank and a large portion should be. You also should know Alcan pays the least amount for its water rentals of any company in North America, hence the reason why they don't want to smelt aluminum  but just want to sell power. So if we're going to live up to our side of the bargain and give them 50 mill for a cold water release, how about they return the mill to full capacity first,  or take them to court to force that issue. Oh ! I forgot,  part of that last agreement calls upon, "the people of this province" to pay for any litigation entered into by Alcan . All the monkeys are not in the zoo Mr. Premier . So now you wonder why your two MLA's (and in particular Roger Harris) bit the dust . Well the folks in Kitimat are mad, damn mad in fact,  that you haven't forced the company to live up to the signed agreement.  They also wonder why in the world you'ld come clean for 50 million dollars, when the company isn't paying anywhere near that kind of tax in this province. Its worth a read Mr. Premier and its worth a real close look. Its important that big business doesn't run this province.  In the Kitimat region, the folks believe thats what's been happening and the Liberals have been a willing dance partner . Thats why, in large measure Mr. Campbell, your two MLA's are heading over to the E-I office today.  
Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

I am glad you have not let up Ben.

I linked a url to the reporting that I do in this post, as a citizen of the Province.

I wanted to test the waters of another mainline stream of reporting that has welled up, because of corporate owned newspapers, who control the way we see?

I wanted people to know as well, it is not business as usual.

I read your reminiscing in regards to Roy Nagel and yourself, about the ole stomping grounds, and just so you know, I am a distant cousin of one of you, that came out of the same roots and area of this country.

Do I support the Liberalized distant cousin on the views and leadership of the Trucking Asscociation?

Not by any means.

You see, when you have lived the experiencing of the labour views and not one of editorial mastership you fellows expunge on, you get a distinctive flavour for the truth of how the Truckers needed help in dealing with corporate sponsorship of contracting out to defer wages of truckers to lower standards?

To further educate the public on contracting out issues, outfits born in entrepunurial times are used as tools for enduring the idea of controlling prices?

Maybe Roy can speak to this some day. I want to be educated better so I will not say much more.

Now coming back to your article, "responsible reporting," of Bloggership, saids point Ben in the right direction, and look at what the public has endured? You get this sense of what BC Rail did to 41% of the population. Was it all BC Rail. Of course not, but it left a legacy. It is not a very good one.

So as we dig deeper into these issues, let's indeed go after the source validation of story, and in my case, the blogership, as a citizens expression, although held under aliaistic writer penmanship, said, "look not at the messenger, but of the viability of the truth expunged."

So yes continue to dig into the heart of the Alcan story, because you will find the sick perversion of Bill 75 over riding public opinion again and again.

The 46% percent of the public does not want to be, or should be, lead my misrepresentation? It been plagued our readers opinions which are controlled by newspapers.

We have to be careful about this reporting and I am willing to test it with my lead, on the Liberal reporting of the fiscal deficit left by the NDP.

I accept the majority vote. I'd like to ride off into the sunset too, but unfortunately, we have to "exerocise the illsuions of demons in society," that drive good people. Then we can get on with it.

Let the opposition do their job.
IMO we need to have such a higher water tax rental that it is impossible for any private corporation to run a hydro dam in the province of BC.

I think all watershed alteration projects should be strictly operated by BC Hydro in the province of BC and all profits from BC Hydro should go to the Province of British Columbia.

Alcan needs to be taxed out of the hydro business in the province of BC.

Its as simple as putting the export tax the Americans suggested for our softwood lumber on all hydro generated electricity exports. Say a 400% export tax on hydro generated electricity from the province of BC.

This does three things:

#1 It ensures hydro generation in BC is operated by the province of BC for the province of BC. Water after all is our most precious resource.

#2 It ensures hydro sales of electricity go to British Columbians first and at a rate that makes British Columbia competitive in its manufacturing base.

#3 It ensures that BC energy use is clean energy, and puts more pressure on our export markets in the US to look at their own options for clean energy. This is key in the era of Kyoto.

That said we all know that the BC Liberals will probably consider privatizing BC Hydro before they ever took the long term strategic view on behalf of British Columbia.

No need to negotiate or take Alcan to court. All we need to do is tax the hell out of hydro genrated exports, and then buy the assets of the Alcan mother corp when she sees she has no options on the table. The longer Alcan holds out the more Alcan loses and the more the Province of BC gets subsidized by Alcan. Alcan would be smart to walk away from the project rather then subsidize the province of BC. Never again would BC water be controlled by a multinational.

Time Will Tell
"I think all watershed alteration projects should be strictly operated by BC Hydro in the province of BC and all profits from BC Hydro should go to the Province of British Columbia. "

Amen

"For over 40 years, BC’s electricity sector, dominated by BC Hydro, has generated reliable electricity for residential, commercial, and industrial customers. Creeping privatization and an increased reliance on dirty power are undermining the historical advantages of the system. The course set out in Energy for Our Future: A Plan for BC will, unfortunately, continue these trends. Pg 26"


Link supplied on my name. "While you Were Sleeping"