Clear Full Forecast

Where Is The Mayor When It Comes To The Flood? One Man'sOpinion

By Ben Meisner

Friday, January 11, 2008 03:42 AM

            

If the Emergency Operations Committee is an indication of what you can look forward to at a time of disaster in this city, God Help Us.

There is no question that there are a good many city staff who are working their buns off on the flooding of the Nechako River, many of them are in over their heads, away over their heads.

Simply look at the list of people who are on the committee and come up with a working group who knows what to do in the event of a major ice flood in the city. Feel more comfortable, or do you?

Watching the goings on at City Hall on Monday should have left anyone cold as to how the City operates in a time of emergency. A mayor who’s name by the way I don’t see on the master list for the EOC but of course he should be able to get in without a pass, criticizing a Councilor who was asking for the city to seek help from the federal and provincial government to get their expertise… a great idea by the way that Brian Skakun had, problem was that the Mayor kept interrupting him ,not allowing him to speak his piece. I believe that the people elected Skakun to do just that, but somehow the democratic system fell apart and I didn’t see anyone from the rest of the Council standing up and saying hold it one minute here Mr. Mayor,  Skakun is entitled to his thoughts.

Then there was the issue of John Brink trying to get to talk to the Council. He , along with a gallery full of businesses, private home owners and unemployed workers who have seen their jobs cut because of the flood, all had a number of questions to ask. What did they get from the Mayor?  He told them he had to look at the whole City’s interests. Well he might start by looking after the interests of the 1,000 workers and the $250 million dollars in investment from that corner of town, instead of trying to brow beat them into submission.

In the end they were told that business has to go it alone, there is no compensation for them or the workers, but $300 grand for the owners. They were allowed to speak but only two reps. from each section,of course minus the unemployed workers after all, what  have they  got to do with the flood, except perhaps try to feed their families while the water keeps them  away from their jobs.

The mayor criticized Skakun for not being involved in the process. I should say 250 has heard more from Skakun and the business owners along River Road than the Mayor. But of course we already know that the mayor doesn’t like us,  after all we are his, “only " opposition to the manner in which city hall runs, and we can’t have anyone speak against his policy, because it’s always the right move, now isn’t it.  

I’m Meisner and that’s one man’s opinion.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

If one cannot handle the regular "emergency" of getting rid of snow from this city's streets within 24 to 30 hours, which most cities in Canada with regualr snowfalls manage to do, why would anyone expect any different when it comes to catastrophic emergencies?
"… a great idea by the way that Brian Skakun had, problem was that the Mayor kept interrupting him ,not allowing him to speak his piece."

Couldn't help noticing the attempts at shutting him up. That wasn't called for.

If I had a problem or a suggestion I would rather take it to Mr. Skakun because it least he listens, reads emails and replies within a reasonable amount of time.

Since the Mayor revealed at the Chamber of Commerce speech that there may/will be a slowdown and less prosperous times just around the corner I would think that this would be followed by a) finally repairing the Cameron Street Bridge for less than a million dollars b) no borrowing for a 30 million dollar new police station (refurbish the existing one) c) no borrowing for a new 30 million dollar Performing Arts Center (make do for now with the existing venues d) no borrowing of 8 million dollars for an artificial ice outdoor speed skating oval e) a leaner and less extravagant attitude in respect to spending the citizens' tax dollars.

IMO Jay Hill and Dick Harris are dropping the ball big time. They shouldn't need a request from council to be putting forward their own ideas as an elected representative. Are they representing our city to the government... or is it the other way around?

Thousands of jobs are on the line; hundreds of millions of dollars in infrastructure under direct threat; and the potential to blow through downtown causing billions in damage… and our federal and provincial politicians are all hiding out counting their pension dollars... even the opposition parties have no contributions to make?

In potential disaster preparedness and management terms this is worse than Katrina-New Orleans, because that happened in a day, so short falls could be blamed a little more on the time needed to make the right decisions. This here could play out over a period of 4 months, but with even worse inept management of the potential situation.

A coincidence theorist would probably come up with any number of reasons for this at election time....
"Bang on" Eagleone.
Sorry Eagleone...should have said bang on Diplomat!
This would never have been an issue if humans had any brains to begin with. You don't build on a flood plain! Duh!! Then when your buildings are destroyed in a flood you don't rebuild in the same spot... DUH!!!

My goodness humans are as dumb as a door knob.

The worship of money is so out of control on this world of ours that basic logic is never even thought of.

Don't blame the mayor or anyone else. These are social issues in which all of us collectively decide to do stupid things based on negative, selfish motives... you know, like build on flood plains.

When we collectively decide to stop being so selfish, greedy and stupid life on Earth will become wonderful. Until then? Just keep expecting things to get worse and worse.
okay ... same old kevin theme ... humans are dumb and worship money .....

When applied to floods it means:

1. Humans build on flood plains because they are dumb

2. Humans build on flood plains because they worship money.

Since we know that everything that humans do is because they are dumb and worship money, why do you keep on posting this? we know that.

Obviously you must keep on posting the same information over and over because you are human and therefore you:

1. you are dumb

2, you worship money

;-)
I don't worship money and yet I am smart enough to know that with (worshippable) money I can live in a heated house with lights, running water and flushing toilets, drive a car and so on.

If I could pay for all this with some other kevin-approved medium I wouldn't bother to have any money at all.

How would I pay for my lottery ticket?

In Venice they didn't build a city on a flood plain but right in the water, in fact in a lagoon!

How dumb was that? Boy, they must be the ultimate worshipers of moolah!

"In potential disaster preparedness and management terms this is worse than Katrina-New Orleans"

Wow.
I think Venice of old was a maritime nation where people needed to get from their home to the ship as fast as possible to get to the find some silk and spices.

Sort of something like living right next to the subway station. Hellishly convenient for transportation, but lousy for noise and privacy in the yard.

;-)
OOps ... make that elevated LRT station .... :-)
And all because those Venitians worshipped money. "Heya Luigi, datsa one spicey meatball, I'va justa soila mia silka shortsa. Donnta worry, I washa dem out ina canal." Maybe they weren't so dumb after all!