Clear Full Forecast

Constable Facing Hearing In Vanderhoof Shooting

By 250 News

Monday, January 14, 2008 02:27 PM

Prince George, B.C. - RCMP Constable Ryan Sherametta,  who shot  Kevin St. Arnaud to death in  Vanderhoof in December of 2004, is facing a  code of conduct  citation for making false statements.  The information follows a Code of Conduct investigation by the RCMP.  Sheremetta may also be facing a charge of perjury.

Constable Sherematta has been advised he has been suspended with pay following  the  intensive scrutiny of his testimony  at the Coroner’s inquest into the death of St. Arnaud.

Specifically,  there were  comments Sheremetta made under oath  in connection with his experience in dealing with weapons seizures.  The  release from the RCMP says:

"Though  the information was not directly related to the specific shooting incident, concerns were raised and the RCMP launched an internal and external Criminal Code  investigation into the allegations:

Sheremetta has been  suspended under the RCMP Act as a result of the following allegation:

That on or about the 23rd day of January 2007 at or near Vanderhof British Columbia, you did conduct yourself in a disgraceful manner that could bring discredit  on the Force by knowingly making false, misleading or inaccurate statement(s) while testifyuing at the Coroner’s Inquest into the death of Kevin St. Arnaud, to wit; your experience in seizing handguns from suspects during your time as a member  at Vanderhoof Detachment contrary to section 39(1) of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act Regulations, 1988"

The release goes on to say that a Criminal Code investigation  was launched parallel to the internal investigation  and the findings have been forwarded to Crown Counsel.  Crown has had that file since  late November, but may not  move  on  laying charges until  a  new review of the whole case has been done.

Assistant Commissioner, Al Macintyre says  a senior officer with the Metro  Toronto Police  will  be brought in to review the entire file. "It will be a senior officer with experience in Internal affairs and  major crime. That office will look at the whole file, everything from top to bottom."   It is expected it will take  a month perhaps two  to  compete that review.  Macintyre says  Sheremetta  is off duty with pay, but   the process has been started  in Ottawa to see if  that can be  changed to "suspended without pay".  That decision could take a month or two.

The date for an adjudication  Board Hearing has not yet been set.

Macintyre  says he  is painfully aware  of the  difficult times  the RCMP find themselves in. "These are very troublng times for the Force.  I have  been on the Force for 36 years in four provinces.  There are three questions  the public should ask:

  1. Am I safe?
  2. Can I trust you?
  3. Are you competant?

My answer is, yes, you are safe,  yes you can trust us, and yes we are competant.  We are a big Force, there are 9,000 of  us in B.C, and from time to time, things will go wrong,  but when that happens, we will do our best to correct it, and to move on."

It is likely the  Commission of Complaints  Against the RCMP will not complete its  review on the  case until the Metro Police probe is complete.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Well good on the RCMP for holding one of their own accountable for lying.

I can't say that getting suspended with pay will put the fear in to other members though.

Sadly, the trend looks like it will continue for officers/officials etc to have sudden and prolonged attacks of amnesia.
I would be suprised if Sherametta had not been suspended for his actions, but it should have happened long before now!
Considering the bad press the RCMP has had lately,I guess somebody had to get thrown to the wolves sooner or later!
Fortunately,the RCMP has done the right thing this time.
Now, we wait to see if anything more comes from the Ian Bush shooting as well.
These two officers need to BOTH be looked at long and hard by the upper chambers of the RCMP brass!
Unfortunately,this is STILL a case of cops investigating cops!
Hard to have much confidence in that kind of a situation as much as I wish I could!
As far as the 3 questions posed by Macintyre.

1. Am I safe?
2. Can I trust you?
3. Are you competant?

I think 1 & 3 are obviously yes. But as for the trust, the force needs to regain my trust. It's not the members in general, of course there are bound to be good and bad within a group of 9000 people.

But to give me a sense of trust, I need to feel that they are firstly out to protect me, not other RCMP members.
Its the upper chambers of the rcmp brass where the big problems exist. They wait too long, they disregard policy, they have their own set of rules which unfortunately don't conform to the Charter of Rights or statute dealing with labour relations.

Shermetta is suspended with pay because of making a false statement, not because of his actions taken regarding the st. arnaud matter.

And if he is suspended without pay he can most likely fight it because if he is not charged with a serious criminal offense, the rcmp simply cannot make that decsion to do so.
check out the rcmp external review committee web site and find out for yerselves.....
And lmorg, what makes this worse is that members lower down the scale get penalized accordingly.

Sherametta is getting reviewed for unrelated statements as you mentioned. Wouldn't you think the next time he, or another member takes the stand they will simply claim to have forgotten everything they are asked about?

This type of action does not help in bringing fairness and justice to the force. Rather it continues to swing the system towards chronyism and misdirection.

Indeed it is the upper chambers where the serious problems remain. But that cancerous ethic continues to filter down and produce this culture of the "untouchable boys club".

Maybe we should privatize it and let Haliburton give it a crack!
You betcha it's a great day for Heidi.
:) It's a huge honest leap in the right direction. My children don't know what's going on but they see mommy smiling! I'm so happy for Rebecca and Kevin's entire family :) Constable Colleen Erickson will forever have my respect for her honesty that night. What's right is right.

Constable Colleen Erickson did the right thing and she should be commended for that.
She is a credit to the RCMP and, god knows,she must have been penalized for her honesty by some members I am sure, considering the code of secrecy that appears to exist within the RCMP.
Hopefully,that is in the proccess of changing once and for all, and this is a major step in the right direction.
This also goes to show that not ALL RCMP/cops are honest!
They are just people doing a tough job, and the first step in repairing the damage that has been done,is to help members understand that.
Far too many think they are excluded from the everyday lives that we all lead.
They are not, and I am sure no one wants them to be.
Welcome to the real world!!
I am glad to see an rcmp finally being held to task for their actions.
I hope we see more of it in the future.

As for the issue of trust, i myself do not feel cops are to be trusted.
Actually i would trust a regular person i see on the street more than a cop these days.

I hope oneday i feel differently.
Officers like Colleen Erickson help to restore the faith. It's about time they reached out and touched this guy.
It is very hard to trust someone who answers only to themselves.
It's an old saying but it's true..."who is policing the police?"
The issues within the RCMP are directly caused by that long time lack of transparency.
I know Constable Erickson personally, and I know she hasn't returned to duty since that night and has suffered stress symptoms like you wouldn't believe. I also know that she is the current Chief of the Sai'kuz First Nation. She was the first female constable in Vanderhoof and the first Aboriginal constable in the area, and yes, all cops should be like her.
"Am I safe?" Police service has nothing to do with it. A 2006 report on the Vancouver PD response times, noted "12 minutes" to a major crime. And that is only the on-site time. On arrival, they access CORNET/Versadex data on address; suspects; and complainants (Yah, anyone who reports a crime gets investigated, and served or disserved based on whatever garbage is on record). Then they decide if they need a backup, which is usually the case. They also read the complete text of the 9-11 audiotape. People die while waiting for paid police protection.

Do cops serve and protect? In 100% of civil suits viz service omission, going back to July 1, 1867, sued cops have denied ANY duty of care to any member of the public. So what do they do if those slugs are NOT protecting the public? They take money for next to nothing? Cop wages are the most generous form of welfare.

Reminder: the Justice Institute website reveals that cops begin street internship after a paltry 65 days of class training. It requires over 600 class days to train a reporter. So why does the public trust uneducated and self-interested slugs? The Zombie-generation has been conditioned to do so by the hero-cop spew of Big-Media.

Imorg: Play Station games aren't real you jerk. Grow some backbone; your doormat act is tiring. The donut-dunkers have their own apologists; they don't need another goof to shellac their whitewashes and coverups.
Folks,look again at the three requirements

1 am I safe
2 can I trust you
3 Are you competant
If you answer No to #2 then #1 and #3 dont matter.
I have long since lost my confidence in The Force.