Clear Full Forecast

Rethink the Downtown Condo Plan

By Ben Meisner

Thursday, October 06, 2005 03:57 AM


I think a second sober look at the proposed down town redevelopment might be in order. 

It is rather interesting that a San Francisco company can see the potential of Prince Goegre that we locals cannot. Do you, in all your wisdom, think that the down town will become the next growth area in this city? 

Let’s see, this development will result in upwards of 150 people moving into the core. We are proposing a homeless shelter within blocks that will grow that population by half that number. Where will these new Down Towner’s go to, say ,shop? 

Unlike Vancouver’s west side or the Beaches in Toronto Prince George just doesn't have that kind of draw.  In Those cities, you can eat at hundreds of eating spots, Prince George can boast Oh say five.  

Then there is the matter of grocery shopping, if you're going to go to Parkwood to shop, why not then live within the radius of that center where you can rent a home for a fraction of what a new condominiums will cost on Quebec?

Unless the Mayor and those people who are promoting the idea of down town haven’t noticed , we have three call centers which don’t exactly pay the kind of salaries that will be required to buy a $175,000 dollar pad. 

Down town in Prince Goegre is not where the heads of corporations have chosen to set up shop. 

So then let’s move on to entertainment.  Want to go a hockey game? You’ can always walk to to the Colliseum to cath the Spruce Kings, but  you'll need a vehicle to get to CN Centre.  

Want to take part in some sports? UNBC will require a bus trip. 

So what’s the draw for the down town? Cheap land, cheap apartments , well maybe in an existing area , but build some new digs and guess what happens to the rent . L

ast week I had a look at the down town of Kamloops.  They have a lot of businesses open and operating in the core, small retail shops, we don’t. They also have taken a special initiative to ensure that street people are steered away from the core, we haven’t. 

What we do have is a few political leaders who are trying to convince us that they are about to turn the problems of down town around. It’s the same problem we had in 1978 , 1982, 1985, 2000, and yes today in 2005 , we have zoned the down town into an area where the average person would not want to live unless there were some very good perks. 

Building a few condominiums using some city money  for seed, just doesn't cut it. 

I’m Meisner and that is one man’s opinion

Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Appreciating your skepticism for the project the only way that you are going to get ownership and accountability for our downtown is to have permanent residents that have pride in their surroundings. Although the process and the proponent may be an issue the philosophy behind downtown revitalization through condominium development is sound.
Correct me if I'm wrong,but was all this talk with this San Francisco company not just what they call a letter of intent(meaning no $$$$ exchanged)sounds like a bunch of BS to me.
Rock
pgpercey ...

Please give me one clear example in North America where a derelict downtown was turned around by the construction of residential condominiums. In other words, do not just say the theory is sound, provide concrete examples of why the theory is sound because it has worked elsewhere.

Make sure you differentiate between those cities which have placed their higher density residential areas smack into the middle of the CBD as opposed to those who have encouraged higher density infill and conversion projects in older residential areas adjacent to the CBD, such as the area between Victoria and Winnipeg streets in the case of Prince George.

We have an existing proposal approved by Council and posted with pretty drawings on the north west corner of 7th and Victoria.

Which project will go ahead first? One has been in the starter blocks for some time waiting for the starter's gun to go off ........