Clear Full Forecast

Federal Fisheries Responds To Declining Populations Of Sockeye

By 250 News

Monday, March 03, 2008 03:55 AM

            

Prince George, B.C. - Following the release of a study undertaken by Levy Woodey and Hardy in 2008 on the serious decline of the Sockeye salmon runs in the Upper Fraser and in particular the Stuart runs, Opinion 250 asked Dr Brian Riddell, of the Science Branch, Pacific Biological Station of the Department of fisheries to comment.

In their report, the group suggested  a cold water release on the Nechako would do little to reduce temperatures in the Nechako River and they called for many stringent measures to be undertaken. They argue the cold water release would not provide sufficient water to reduce temperatures in the system to assist the fish in their migration.  

In Response to the findings in the report Stuart Area Sockeye Salmon runs and their importance to the First Nations of the Upper Fraser River Watershed. Levy, Woodey and Hardy. 2008.  ( see previous story) here are  Dr. Riddell’s comments:

The Upper Fraser Fisheries Conservation Alliance (UFFCA) released a report February 20, 2008, on declining abundance of Early and Late Stuart sockeye in the upper Fraser River. 

Early and Late Stuart sockeye salmon are two of the most vulnerable salmon populations in the Fraser River due to their extended migration (lake to ocean), which covers 1,200 kilometres.  These fish are highly valued by the First Nations in the upper Fraser who depend on these salmon for food, social, and ceremonial uses.  Since the mid-1990s, both the Early and Late Stuart sockeye populations have declined severely in abundance and  there are concerns about the future survival of these important sockeye runs.

Consequently, the UFFCA undertook a review to assess the status of these sockeye and to analyze the possible causes for this decline suggesting that adverse environmental conditions during adult up-stream migration are largely responsible for the recent declines in the numbers of mature salmon returning to the Stuart lakes system.

Programs conducted by Fisheries and Oceans Canada have provided the vast majority of the data and information used in the review, and the Department generally agrees with the  technical issues discussed. However, marine productivity is a major issue which the report mentions but does not make recommendations on.  We  agree that future climate warming/change could further impact these sockeye populations. Departmental staff has been conducting substantial research into the up-stream passage, stress, and mortality of sockeye salmon.  A gap in the report is consideration of a substantial number of other publications related to up-stream migration of sockeye salmon and causes of mortality in the Fraser River.

The Department is fully aware of the current state of these populations, and that the Stuart sockeye populations are an irreplaceable linage of Pacific salmon important to First Nations and others in B.C.  These are the types of salmon resources to be conserved through Canada’s Policy on the Conservation of Wild Pacific Salmon (2005).  As the report indicates, changes to the marine conditions and the Fraser River will bring challenges to maintaining and restore returns to these Stuart sockeye populations.  Returns in 2008 are likely to remain weak and the Department will again implement stringent fisheries management measures  to conserve these populations.

In a broader research context of what is determining the marine survival of Pacific salmon, DFO is currently working on studies aimed at understanding the early ocean and late ocean-migration phases of salmon in the Strait of Georgia. This research is in keeping with the federal government’s announcement in late 2007 of $42.5 million over three years to fund activities to conserve and protect Canadian oceans, bringing the five-year commitment for the health of the oceans to $61.5 million.  Specifically, DFO is undertaking new projects on understanding how ocean temperatures and productivity, food sources, and distribution of salmon within the Strait of Georgia have been changing. One focus of these studies is to understand how these changes have been affecting the growth and survival of salmon and other species.

DFO’s priorities are to conserve the resource, to meet food, social and ceremonial obligations to First Nations, and to support economically and environmentally sustainable fisheries.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

As is the usual with the Federal Fisheries,too little much too late!
What a bunch of cash burning bozo's!
Ya just gotta love those studies!!
The only thing that makes sense is to leave the fish alone until they recuperate in numbers. Food, social, ceremonial and otherwise. That means everybody.
Everyone needs to get used to the fact that due to Federal and Provincial Gov/DFO missmanagement of the Pacific Salmon, we will lose them. Fish farms will replace them and the governments like that.
How many fish do the natives on the lower Fraser take? They have said in the past they will take as many fish as they can and to hell with those up the river. DFO seems to be hands of there. I wonder who the politicians are that tell DFO to back off. While I am on the subject anyone know why DFO and CO's pack sidearms? I have an idea, to defend against attack salmon and bunnies.
The politicians don't have the cajones' to shut it down,and it yes,it SHOULD be shut right down!
Period.
NO FISHING for ANYONE for at least a 3 year cycle minimum!
But to a poltician,it is all about votes, and god forbid they should lose one from anybody!
They will screw around until they are gone for good!
They pack heat to protect themselves from angry non natives. Apparently we call them peace officers now. I have a ceremony that I used to like to perform, in season of course, it was called the 'fill the freezer
with food for the family' ceremony, and used to be held twice a year.
Of course the fishery should be shut down to be given a chance to recover, that makes sense. And if it makes sense, the gov't is out of it's depth, and will have to bring in some experts for advice.
metalman.
"bring in some experts for advice"
Oh crap,here we go with another study!!
As I've said before in this space...

This is just another example, in a seemingly endless line nowadays, of how destructive, selfish, arrogant and greedy we are as a species. This issue of declining Salmon is the fault of us all, be it you are a logger butchering the land, a fisherman that takes more than you need, a home owner dumping chemicals all over your land, a cattle rancher that allows his cattle to constantly foul the waterways, etc., etc., etc..... The Salmon will become extinct because humans, one by one, refuse to take any of the blame for why we're killing our planet. It's always someone else's fault... blah, blah, blah. A dying planet is the result of the person you look at in the mirror every day.
I prefer that the government hires experts to do studies to see what the hell is actually going on and what can be done about it. Politicians are not experts, any more than the rest of the posters on this forum seem to be.
Here are some fact for you: Without the DFO and govt management of the fisheries there WOULD BE NO FISHERIES. "common sense" applied be people with vested interests, would have taken all the fish and moved to the next species. This has been the case with other resources, exploited before there were management agencies. Fact 2: There are a lot of factors influencing salmon stocks from year to year. Many of these are beyond our control. Fact 3: None of us depend on the fishery for our livelihood or culture. We might not think a 3 year moratorium was a good idea if we did. What would we say if the people down south decided a 3 year moratorium on logging and mining was a good idea because 'everyone' down there 'knows' we are just raping the land? Talk to some folk down there, you will discover that they have a much different view of resource use than we do (ie: butchering the land, strip mining the forests, etc.) That, i guess is my last fact: that without experts and studies we would operating according to public perception. When we do that we might as well give up on planning, management AND common sense.
"..conserve the resource, to meet food, social and ceremonial obligations to First Nations.."

Is that so that us SECOND NATIONS people can buy all the fish we want from the FIRST NATIONS people when they come around with tubs of sockeye every fall?

I'm wondering how dredging the Nechako River for those that want to live in the Nechako River flood plain, will effect the fish?


"I'm wondering how dredging the Nechako River for those that want to live in the Nechako River flood plain, will effect the fish?"

It won't, with the amount of silt that is always flowing down the Fraser past the Nechako, any siltation caused from dredging would have no negative effect on fish stocks.
How about everyone just consuming fish flavoured tofu sticks for the next few years? Yum. Yum. And give the fishys a chance to rebuild.