Clear Full Forecast

Report From Parliament's Hill - March 13th,2008

By Prince George - Peace River M.P. Jay Hill

Thursday, March 13, 2008 03:44 AM

NDP Selective On Women’s Rights

Can you imagine the reaction of the New Democratic Party and Canada’s major national news media if the Government of Canada took no action and refused to participate in a United Nations-sanctioned mission to intervene in a war-torn, poverty-stricken nation where women and children were brutally slaughtered daily for something as simple as showing their faces? 

The NDP, the party that likes to sell itself as THE champion of women’s rights and the impoverished, would express their outrage and indignation.  They would accuse the Conservative Party of abandoning women and allowing the continued brutalization of children.  The would demand that Canada “do something”!

And yet last week, International Women’s Week, when Canada hosted six democratically-elected female members of the Afghan National Assembly, the NDP was strangely and hypocritically silent.  These women were able to be here thanks to the bravery and sacrifice of Canadian soldiers and, due to the shameful lack of media coverage, most Canadians didn’t even know about their week-long visit.

I wish that each and every Canadian could have met these incredible women. Can you imagine the courage it takes to stand for election in a country where before the arrival of the UN-backed NATO troops, a woman would be publicly executed by the Taliban government simply for teaching girls or not covering her face?

I wonder if Jack Layton had the courage to look these women in the eye and repeat his absurd suggestion that they “share power” with the Taliban, the very group that wants to execute them for daring to be an elected representative. 

What happened to the concern of the NDP and the Liberals that women are underrepresented in Canada’s Parliament?  Under Jack Layton’s proposal for power sharing with the Taliban, there wouldn’t be a single female parliamentarian in Afghanistan.

And speaking of democracy here in Canada, the opposition parties’ claims that the Canadian Forces mission to Afghanistan has not been subject to democratic debate are equally hypocritical.

The former Liberal government held absolutely no debate when Canadian soldiers were first sent to Afghanistan in 2001.  Stephen Harper is the first Prime Minister since the Second World War who has given Parliament the power to decide whether Canada will participate in a military mission.  The most recent debate in the House – a Conservative initiative – was over 30 hours.  And that follows the countless hours of previous parliamentary debate.

The Conservative ministers of Foreign Affairs and National Defence have appeared 17 times before standing committees of the House of Commons to discuss the Afghan mission.  Our Government has held 15 technical briefings to inform the public.  And of course there was the non-partisan Manley commission.

And still, the NDP are trying to convince Canadians that democratic debate is missing on this matter and they accuse our Conservative Government of not being transparent.

Well it’s the NDP that’s certainly transparent on this issue … transparently hypocritical.  Either you believe in women’s rights, or you don’t!

    
Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Is this column supposed to be a report on what Hill has done in Parliament, or is it a free paid, political party advert?

One thing is absolutely for sure, Mr. Hill is an absolute master of distorted reasoning and twisted facts.

AND still no comment about the Cadman scandal.

Neither is there any comment about the Tory plan in their budget to steal $55 Billion (Billion not million) from the EI surplus. Their newly minted EI system will start of with a $2 Billion surplus, while the present system has a $57 Billion surplus. That difference of $55 Billion is the property of workers and the companies they work for, not the Tories. It is not tax money, it is to protect people from a declining economy and using it for anything other than that is theft,
I love the rich hypocrisy. Amazing it can be done with a straight face.

Jay Hill says, "Can you imagine the reaction...if the Government of Canada took no action and refused to participate in a United Nations-sanctioned mission to intervene in a war-torn, poverty-stricken nation where women and children were brutally slaughtered daily for something as simple as showing their faces?"

No I can't imagine that. But I can imagine from recent history when a Canadian solder was killed deliberately while participating in a UN mission, operating out of a fixed location, while Israel applied collective punishment to an entire population of Lebanon in violation of a cease fire… destroying not only civilian bridges, power plants, water distribution infrastructure as well as 20-story civilian apartment complexes in complete wanton disregard for international law... and this conservative government supported the heinous war crimes while they were being committed in front of the worlds eyes. That was a monumental failure on Harpers part.

And today as recently as last week Israel has used helicopter gun ships and F-16 fighter jets to kill 50-60 people a day all last week in a defenceless Gaza against a people who's land was stolen and are now caged up like collective animals starved of basic necessities like power and water. Meanwhile, in the West Bank homes are being bull dozed as we speak with no forewarning and without allowing the residents to first claim their belongings... so that new ethnocentric occupation settlements can be built on Palestinian farm land.

Israel is an apartheid occupation plan for political zionism that is implementing ethnic cleansing through generational genocide via theft of land and institutionalized government terror designed to make people leave their homes. It is completely against Canadian values, and yet all three Canadian political parties will trip over themselves to support those policies in Israel/Palestine (the wholesale ethnic cleansing and theft of Palestine). It brings to question why this is that all three recognized Canadian political parties would have the hypocrisy to support these un-Canadian values and even go so far as legitimize them to the world?

I can vote for a lot of things, but I can not vote for any party that supports the kind of inhumane policy that is zionist Israel as an ethnocentric state where half of its citizens have no rights as a humane being what-so-ever... a policy that inspires terrorism as the only option for a voice by extremists throughout the region who only have fools to negotiate with full of the kind of hypocrisy Jay Hill and his conservatives support.

My big rant for the day. I'd like to see the conservative government come out and at least voice opposition to the insane policies of hatred taking place in the so-called-holy-land.... Why we our country always has to be seen as supporting the crime and cheerleading is beyond me.
My opinion is that this column has to be approved first by the one who rules the whole show in Ottawa before it is submitted for publication.

Nobody is allowed to do or say anything that does not fall within certain strict guide lines.

Ditto for the Cadman thing.

I think you are right diplomat!
This column is Harper approved because being the dictator that he is,NOBODY even goes to the john without his permission!
I don't believe he would allow the likes of Jay Hill to ramble on without somebody pre-approving the rhetoric.
And the Cadman issue WILL go away eventually,just like all the other crap that occurs in Harpers government ( hell,ANY government)and they know that.
Scream,rant and rave, and threaten lawsuits,and they will back off.
I do notice lately that there are a lot of cracks starting to appear in the "we are the good guys"facade that Harper and his government wear.
No suprises there.
The reason Hill is so virulently anti-NDP today is because there is an NDP amendment about Afghanistan to be voted on today that the Conservatives absolutely hate.

it says:

NDP Amendment
And of the amendment of Ms. Black (New Westminster—Coquitlam), seconded by Ms. McDonough (Halifax), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words from “Whereas” to “goals in the region;” and substituting the following:


“That the House call upon the government to begin preparations for the safe withdrawal of Canadian soldiers from the combat mission in Afghanistan with no further mission extensions;


that, in the opinion of the House, the government should engage in a robust diplomatic process to prepare the groundwork for a political solution, under explicit UN direction and authority, engaging both regional and local stakeholders, and ensuring the full respect for international human rights and humanitarian law;


that, in the opinion of the House, the government should maintain the current suspension on the transfer of Afghan detainees to Afghan authorities until substantial reforms of the prison system are undertaken;


that, in the opinion of the House, the government should provide effective and transparent development assistance under civilian direction consistent with the Afghanistan Compact;”


and by deleting all of the words following: “to ensure that Canadians are being provided with ample information on the conduct and progress of the mission”.


Voting on the amendment and the main motion — not later than the expiry of the time provided for Government Orders, pursuant to Order made Wednesday, March 12, 2008.





The outcome of any amendment by the NDP is a foregone conlusion.
I am no fan of the NDP but, in my opinion, Layton has the right approach as far as Afghanistan goes.

You could be right, Andyfreeze. However, if that is the case, you have to ask why a Deputy Whip in the ruling party would fill the whole of a parliamentary "report" attacking a party whose opinions are so unimportant. Perhaps the reason is that on this issue the NDPs opinions reflect the views of Canadians in general far more accurately than do the Conservative views.

I would also note that winning votes in Parliament is not the only way to influence government. Over the years many NDP ideas have been picked up by other parties and enacted in legislation. Think Medicare, for example, underfunded and under attack as it is.
In the last month, Harper has shot his lily white credentials all to hell!
You don't get this much flack unless at least SOME of it is true!
As with most politicans,he will self destruct of his own accord if left alone long enough!
Covering up lies with more lies always has a way of coming back to haunt you and
by the same token,calling someones widow and family liars pretty much tells us what exactly we are dealing with here.
And after the vote in the house today...the honeymoon is REALLY over for him!