Clear Full Forecast

Forestry Roundtable Coming to P.G. May 3rd

By 250 News

Sunday, April 27, 2008 06:11 AM

Prince George, B.C.  - The Forestry Roundtable will be holding a session in Prince George on Saturday May 3rd. 

The session is by invitation only,  “Invitations have been sent out to key stakeholders” was the response from the Ministry of Forests public relations person.

The public, or those who have not been invited but who want to make a submission, are invited to do so by e-mail. Forestry.RoundTable@gov.bc.ca

Members of the public have expressed concerns over the   dropping of the policy of appurtancy i.e., requiring companies to process the logs near the communities where they are harvested.  At the recent meeting in Mackenzie, (the third in a series of sessions)  

The feeling by audience members was that the cancellation of the appurtancy requirement by the provincial government had been an utter failure as a policy.  Indeed, as a result of this cancellation, communities like Mackenzie had no protection from companies who shut down their mill operations, yet still ship out logs to other regions. 

One person proposed that what was needed was a new kind of appurtancy which, while requiring companies to process the logs near the communities where they are harvested, would still have enough flexibility so that companies could remain viable and the region as a whole could prosper.

Other audience members made the proposal that raw log exports, whether these were out of the country or out of the region, should be outright banned, and that, in regards to forest tenure, companies that hold onto tree farm licenses after closing mill operations, should have to sell them if other buyers are interested.  In addition, the existing tenure system should be reviewed with the view to allowing value-added companies and smaller operators more access to the timber basket.

An audience member also raised the concern of forest fire in regards to the millions of hectares of dead beetle wood.  Many communities in the Interior and North are very close to the dead trees, yet there is often little or no buffer area to shield these communities from forest fires, which can be unusually intense in beetle wood timber.

The Forestry round table is scheduled to hold a session in Mackenzie on May 23rd.

Key considerations  during all sessions will include:

   climate change and the challenges and opportunities it presents for B.C. forests;  

   remaining competitive in evolving world economies;

   the impact of innovation and technology on forestry;

   changing demographics within an aging workforce;

   issues affecting B.C.'s forests, suchas themountain pine beetle

   changing social expectations of forests and the forest industry and

upholding First Nations’ rights;

sustaining B.C.’s world-renowned environmental standards.

 


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

I am also concerned about the forest fire risk.
I spend a lot of time out in rhubarb,there is no doubt,we are a time bomb!
If it ever gets started,god help us!
Unfortunately,there is really not all that much that can be done to deal with that,considering the size of the area we are dealing with.
Many areas have seen the removal of dead wood from close proximity to roads and powerlines,but it may not be enough if it actually happens.
I do believe the appurtancy is very important as we can not afford to have wood sent out of area. If the fires and old growth were allowed to burn there would be less bugs
Although I can see reasons for moving trees to adjacent areas for processing, I am deeply concerned by the shipment of raw logs out of the country. The jobs and economy of this province depends on the forests. We can not afford to ship the jobs out of province.
It was NOT the Liberals who started the the ball rolling on the elimination of the "mill it where you cut it"clause,(appurtancy)they have actually done a good job of making things worse.
In 2007,Rich Coleman basically handed over 28,000 hectares of land (waterfront)to Western Forest Products (Jordan River)to do with as they wish.
For many small sawmill communities,that is the begining of the end,and the precedent was set.
Coleman said he did so because they had asked for financial aid?
Western Forset Products will develope this land into subdivision lots,resorts,etc.
What they have actually done,is give the forest companies the right to log the wood, and then sell it off as they wish.
My question is,would they do that for a forest compay up here in the north?
I seriously doubt it,but I do see the timber being totally controlled by a couple of the big companies and they will do with it as they wish!
Look to see more of this kind of stupidity by the Campbell government.
The biggest mistake we can make is thinking the Liberals actually give a damn about the smaller rural sawmill communities here in the north.
They don't, and it is called "progress".
Wait for things to get MUCH worse with little or no support from the Liberal government.