Clear Full Forecast

Thoughts on the Mackenzie Rally

By Submitted Article

Thursday, May 29, 2008 03:43 AM

by John Grogan

 

I recently traveled from the Robson Valley to show support for the people of Mackenzie and what they are going through with massive layoffs. My community went through and continues to suffer similar hard times with the closing of the local sawmill last year, and it is after all the working families that end up paying for the economic hangover.

 

The Mackenzie Rally may have been prompted in part by the occasion of the Forestry Roundtable roadshow making a stop in Mackenzie. This in part was a reason why I drove the 300 km (one way) from the Robson Valley to Prince George to get on a bus at 7 a.m. in order to travel the additional two hours to Mackenzie. I wanted to voice my utter contempt for a process that excluded public access to the discussions taking place behind closed doors. This is what deMOCKracy looks like! For decades industry blamed environmentalists for any downturn. Road apples! I blame government mismanagement which enables unchecked corporate greed.

 

The Mackenzie Rally was an historical event in British Columbia. The anti corporate globalization protests as previously held in Seattle and other large cities worldwide has come home to the heart of British Columbia, and the people of Mackenzie should be proud of what they did that day. It may well be the spark needed to fire up a rebirth of common purpose. Remember the Wobblies?!

 

Mackenzie is NOT a dead-end road from which lumber and profits leave to build empires on the city skyline. It is home to people with dreams, ambitions and bills to be paid. Mr. Coleman... are you listening?

 

After the speeches in the parking-lot were said and done, the crowd marched three blocks north to the Catholic Church were the Forestry Roundtable was taking place. It was a most well-mannered crowd, sans the anarchists and the “black-watch” typical of urban demonstrations; but the contempt for this abuse of power and process by this government was palpable. The person with the bull-horn repeatedly called for Minister Coleman to come out (being that there was a police presence to ensure that we did not come in). We brought with us “the people's resolutions” (see below) to be considered by those behind closed doors in their (not our) Forestry Roundtable. “Mr. Coleman... are you listening?

 

In typical Canadian fashion it was a polite crowd that marched to the Forestry “roundtable” but it was a most cowardly Minister of Forestry that pretended not to hear the people outside, or perhaps was too busy with his corporate bosses to be bothered with the pions outside with their bullhorn and their silly resolutions. It is exactly this lack of access to process that prompts some to use more destructive means... (I did not see any “Micky D” in Mackenzie... thank goodness)

 

The crowd standing outside the church calling for Mr. Coleman showed respect for property and most did not even step in the grass, but stood instead at the curb... curbed by a sense of decency and respect that was not reflected by the Minister of Forest Companies. Mr. Coleman... are you listening?

 

Just wanting to be heard... a singular courageous woman walked up the sidewalk to the front door of the church with our “resolutions” for the “roundtable's” consideration. She was met by a man of some “authority” who received the resolutions, who then went inside with them. Our duty to democracy having been done, and nothing else to do, we marched back to the parking lot where a community BBQ was in progress. The BBQ was good, but Mr. Coleman's behaviour left a bad taste in my mouth.

 

It was not until the bus ride home that it came to me the significance of bringing the “resolutions” to a closed door at the church. The powers that be had effectively retreated to SANCTUARY to protect themselves, and at the same time had locked the people out of their church. Mr. Coleman... are you listening?

 

The image suddenly came to me of religious reformer Martin Luther tacking his infamous 95 Theses to the door of the church nearly 500 years ago. Mr. Coleman, I am past caring if you are listening. You showed your true colours by failing to come to the door when the people knocked. You continue to sell your indulgences to your corporate bosses at your own political peril and those with whom you sit.


One last thought. This whole experience reminds me of Dr. Seuss' fine children's book "Horton Hears a Who" in which we learn that "a person is a person, no matter how small", that it takes all the voices in the choir in order to be heard and that "WE ARE HERE... WE ARE HERE... (we need YOUR voice here) WE ARE HERE!

 

Hyperbole or not, that is my story and I'm sticking to it...

 

John Grogan


John Grogan is a community activist living in the Robson Valley.  He has been active in media community access, labour,enviromental and peace movements. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Grogan_(Canadian_politician)

 


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Well said!
My sentiments exactly!
Yes, Well Said!
I agree.
The BC Liberals Forestry Practices have run our Forest dependant communities into the ground. Coleman has done all he can to sell out BC's Forests. His reluctance to come out to adress the peoples concerns that day in Mackenzie shows clearly the contempt he has for the working people of BC. His reluctance highlights the arrogance of his and his party. The BC Liberals have a new meaning to "Buy BC" that being BC is forsale. We have an oppurtunity for change on Tuesday May 12, 2009. Don't let that oppurtunity slip away, vioce with your vote. Bring the needed change for all working people in BC.
Who were the Wobblies? All those who work in industry should make it a point to find out.

Cheers
Rich Coleman's attitude only reflects the sheer arrogance of the Gordon Campbell government.
Has anybody actually SEEN Gordon Campbell in either Fort St.James or Mackenzie lately?
Or anywhere else where he may have to interact with the working stiffs?
No,and we are not likely to anytime soon.
Instead, we are sent those with no power and very little say over anything not pre-approved by the silent master himself.
No one expects the provincial government to fix the problem overnight,but they do expect communication and leadership,considering that poor government policies and a lack of action have had a major impact on much of the issue.
So far we have had only the usual tokens and rehtoric that do not even begin to go far enough.
This is NOT the same economic downturn in the forest sector we have all seen so many times here in B.C.
It is much bigger than that,and horse of a completely different colour that has been riding our way for a long time.
It requires new thinking and new policies to instill some kind of confidence in the industry that there is in fact help on the way.
Even if it will take some time.
What this tells me is that the Liberals are no longer listening, and for a political party in power with an election looming,that could be a fatal mistake.
Good one Bridge.
IWW
As in "wobble the job" which is a term for job site disention or a "sit down" as we used to call it.
We don't hear the terminolgy much anymore, but the practice itself is still doing well I am sure!
;-)
I agree with this article. I would add that what we are all faced with at this time, is a lot more than Coleman's doings.
This has been at work a long time and the now obvious ends of this journey are now becoming so painfull to so many people that finally the voice of the people is becoming loud enough to begin a change.
There are a few questions which people must ask before they "focus" on one person as "responsible" for this mess, such as Coleman. From the beginnings of all this decades ago, there was an inevitable result to follow, the day of which the government no longer controlled things for the public's best interest's, but would have to follow the agendas of large corporations--and they would have to follow these corporations--regardless of what it harmed the worker--the community--the taxpaying public--the country for that matter. This current dilemma is a product of many governments of all stripes and this leads to the question; WHY has the general trend in decisions concerning forestry policy marched in one direction?
-towards corporate monopolies?--towards a few giants dominating the BC forestry industry? For decades this has been happenning with over 20 forest ministers serving under 3 different political parties. Were all these politicians stupid, OR is there a decision making group which leads both the buracracy and the political directions in this dedicated march towards keeping the giant corporations happy?. I am convinced that the second and third row back from the political mouthpiece is the real decision makers in this process--a process of which keeps these politicians following their lead in a dizzy complexity of issues--and always providing the content to speechs and arguments which align with the corporate agendas. I have come to this conclusion after closely watching hollow policy commitments being promised to actually become devices to destroy what the policy was to serve--and always the corporations interests were served at the expense of anyone else--usually EVERYONE else.
You may very well be right woodchipper.
The move toward corporate control of the B.C.forest industry began in the late 40's under the Liberal/Conservative? coalition government and continued into the early 50's under the new Social Credit government.
With Whacky Bennett as leader.
He was a former Conservative by the way.
From there on,it just got worse.
Graft,bribery,and even jail time for some of the politicians involved, and the total destruction of the independant logger/sawmill operators.
The theory was that they would simply contract for the big guys,but we all know what happened there.
Two or three big forestry giants gave it all to themselves.
And H.R.McMillan was god.
Growing up on the coast in Powell River,I remember well the demise of many of these independant logging companies, or gypo's as they were known back then.
The owners of these outfits were our neighbours,friends, and families and it was brutal.
The big debate has always been what was in it for the B.C.government?
The answer is one hell of a lot of revenue,with little thought for the future.
There is no doubt money changed hands under the table on a regular basis, and the practice of allowing the big corporations to call the shots has continued up to today.
I have always said that you have never seen a clearcut unless you saw what they did back then!
It wasn't even logging,it was total decimation of the resource.
What we are seeing now is the final result of many years of bad management and policies and there is no reason to believe that will change anytime soon!
There is not much more damage bad government and the big corporations can do that they haven't already done.
All they can do now is bail out and leave B.C. holding the bag.
I have a novel idea, lets blame the Government for all our problems.

Why do people make a decision to work in a place like Mackenzie (one horse town)move their family there, never discuss the decision with anybody, and when the bottom falls out it becomes the Governments fault, and the fault of the Company.

There are no gaurantees in this day and age. People should be prepared to move at a moments notice. Do they really beleive that it is the Companys, or Governments responsibility to gaurntee them a job for life.

I suspect that most of the disgruntled are high paid Union Workers, NDP losers, with a good sprinkling of Government workers living high off the hog on taxpayers money.

If I was in Mackenzie or Prince George I would be packing my bag and looking for a place to relocate, not whining to the Government to bail me out.
Palopu .. good points. Let's dump on Canfor while were at it. If I had shares in Canfor I would be asking the directors to really check if a rebuild of NCP is the best move for the company. I hope PG is the location for a rebuild - we have to sell our town as that location, as every other interior town will be chasing the same thing. Give er Colin.
It's not the governments fault Palopu,but they sure as hell didn't do much to make a bad situation better over the years and this is the end result.
I am sure these people who are out of work all know vfery well they may have to move, but thats not a very pleasant prospect so let's not throw it in their faces.
And as far as wages are concerned,the wages were given by the companies because they were making money and could afford it.
These hard working people were the reason for that, and they damn well deserve what they make.
I am sure most of them are already packing their bags, but the big question is...where do they go?
If only it were that simple.
Yes Palopu I agree with you. Government has no responsibilty to the common grunt what so ever. Shame on the grunts to expect some service for their servitude. Shame on anyone who expects govenment to serve anyone except corporations. I bet the 250 million to be spent on BC Place retactable roof would go a long way to help resource towns where the money comes from in the first place.
I tell you one thing...
I sure am sick and tired of hearing all the CRYING from you people posting here that have nothing but insults to throw at union and government employees all the time. They are the people that have built this country and you spit on them every chance you get. Move to china or Iraq or some place similar where you will fit right in with your beliefs.
How about if you have nothing good to say then don't say anything at all. People sure are tough and real mouth pieces when they post on the internet.
Perhaps you would prefer to meet the union and gov employees out behind the wood shed and discuss your problems out there like men. Didn't think so.
Lost faith that is the most idiotic thing to say. Ya lets go out behind the wood shed so I can thump you because someone is disgruntled with unions and government employees. Get over it dude its part of the DNA of man to distrust government employees and unions when you are not one of them. If you want to be effective in your argument get to the specifics that you feel will sway those to your opinion, but your constant threats to those that have issues with that demographic are childish and should have no part in the debate. If your attitude is one of violence for those that disagree then I think it is you that would be more comfortable in Iraq.

It seems you may be a unionized government employee with lots of time on his hands and a thin skin for criticism out of an internal guilt for your own performance. Thats how I read your last post.. also pathetic.

Cheers
Responding to Bond I have to disagree about May 12th 2009. I think that is too late because what it does is legitimizes the actions of the Campbell government for the last 4-years.

IMO a recall should be started now even if it removes only one MLA a week before the next election if for nothing else then to mark the public record with the disapproval of that governments past policy. Ideally PG north would be a good riding to make that statement in, but John (TILMA lover) Rustad is probably the guy we should be going after first for removal because it was the policies that he championed (with no voter mandate) that will do the most lasting damage to our local sustainability as communities.
The palopu writer has a interesting point of view.You ask why we northerners "choose to live in our one horse towns". Well to work, feed our families, pay taxes,own a home, do a little fishin and die....kinda like most people do everywhere else.

You refer to a concept of "not talking about (our decision to live in these one horse towns) with anyone else". I would like to know who I should have discussed my decision to move with, how silly of me.

I don't think that anyone truly believes that a company or a government owes a person a living as you state---BUT we definitely owe it to ourselves and our brothers and sisters to have a government focussed on the best of which it can do for all our interests--don't we?

Nobody said everything is always the government's fault or the companies fault--but is it impossible that they could not do a better job of somethings? Do we exist and work for no other reason to make a company rich, have them spend their profits in another country and when the going gets rough--just quit?
For what its worth, did you ever ask yourself why there are so many one horse towns? Why are these one horse towns are now hurting so bad? Thats probably enough complicated questions for now.

So compassionate you are for calling us stupid and to tell us to"pack our bags."
Well..palapoo, on this planet which is quite different than yours, we are larger creatures than you which now have too large of homes to fit in our "packed bags".
PS
I really did appreciate your thoughtfull opinion and because it is a wise one, please go to a local bar on friday night--yes this friday night--a busy bar and share your viewpoints as loudly as possible. Have a nice day.
I just wanted to remind palopu et al:
Our government is elected to represent the people, the citizens and be accountable to us and manage our tax dollars for that purpose.
So expecting our "leaders" to live up to that is not stupid...it is responsible.
Woodsniper. I will do that the same day that those people who knock the Iraq's go to Baghdad stand on the street corner and tell them how wrong they are.. Their life span will be shorter that a tail gunner in a second world war bomber.

Im not saying people are stupid, Im saying that they are adults and have to live by the results of their decisions. I dont hear anyone crying in this area about the 1400 employees laid off in Windsor Ont.

Pulp Mill workers, Sawmill workers etc; dont work any harder than other Canadians but usually get paid a hell of a lot more, because of the Unions ability to negotiate contracts. Ive worked in Pulp Mills have many friends and relatives who work in the forest industry and have held Union positions, and at one time was a strike leader, so I have some idea what I am talking about.

Whether or not people lose money on their houses depends on how much equity they have built up. If they have no equity then in essence they have been renting their house from the mortgage company who is the real owner, so those people can walk and rent somewhere else. Those who have equity have a problem, and I dont have an answer. Once a (One horse town }founders there are limited options.

Eagleone perhaps you and I should meet for coffee.
WTF are you talking about dude, "constant threats"
Your one of the ungreatful mouth pieces on this site, you know that right. You blame unions and everyone else in the world for all your problems and hide behind a keyboard to do so. Your a coward dude. Go stand up on a stage in front of the people in this town and tell them all face to face how unions have screwed us all.
Go hug your pet bears.
I see numerous posts blaming the current downturn on Government policies and practices- the NDP and the USW have been promoting this for the current crisis in the forestry industry.

Get Real the downturn is quite simple- it is purely an ecomonic down turn due to.

1. 15% tariff- on softwood- a federal issue-not easily solved.

2. Low lumber prices due to weak demand

3. High Canadian dollar.

4. Weak US housing market- down approx 2/3 thirds.

5. high fuel costs

The NDP forest critic blames the the government- if he cann't focus on the real problems he should step down asap.
Your right dogs, as coleman recites this same set of reasons several times a day looking through the same simple tunnel of "explainable realities".
I am no more impressed with the NDP than you are concerning the blame game. I also do not blame coleman personally as he is no different than most of his 20 odd predecesors under 3 different parties.
I do blame the wizards in senior levels of the MOF for directing the ways which politicians must follow--the ways which our system has been designed as a mega corporation only dominated forest industry which has two limitations;
The first is that this supermill stratedgy only allows the production of a very few number of product types which 99% of it must go to one market--which is the US housing market of course--and hence the first four pionts in your diagnosis is entirely correct.
The second limitaion is that "believe it or not" a large multinational corporation has a different business stratedgy than most single facility operators/local ownership. A blogger called "socredible" refers to this limitation in several posts and speaks to what this means for the decisions made under the assumptions of economics from various quarters.
While we ordinary folk generally believe that corporate decisions are simple and direct and on the surface must be properly based for the sake of economics to the specific mill operation--they are usually not that simple. Visualise a chess game with many pieces (mills)and know that "sacrafice" of a piece can easily be justified to better your position in the game. The "game" is a complicated and ever shifting set of corporate priorities which are well tuned to MOF/government thinking and therefore policies or initiatives such as the current liberal green plan will mesh with these large corporations for the political party's benefit and arrive to the corporation to directly benefit them as well. So the game is actually the political party gain combined with the "overall" gains of the cooperative corporation. Call it a type of partnership for mutual gain, political-corporate gain. And this my friend is where things become very elusive to most as these decisions made are not posted or presented for all to see. They don't want this to be seen as incestuous--which it is--they don't want to be seen as manipulating the public's resources-- which it does--and they certainly do not want to be seen as directing public money to a company to achieve political gain.
When you think about it, the greatest value in a monopoly is that there is no one else in the circle of decisions concerning the economics which government influences. There is no one to verify the values of the resource as no one is allowed to prove otherwise--and according to the US softwood coalition--this amounts to a non competetive log market of which represents a subsidy through stumpage and other things.
I have a hunch of what many would respond to this comment and answer it this way.
If there is no other path of success possible for our forest industry than this mega mill-multinational only partnership,
then why is it that every single policy which the MOF comes up with impedes/restricts/undermines/minimises/compromises the possibility or opportunity to establish or viably operate on a level and proportional basis--practically any new operations of which could represent any effect/threat upon these giant corporations? Go ahead and explain to me how effective the small business program was--as it was an obviously a misnamed attempt to "window dress" as an answer to public pressures while doing the exact opposite.
There is another answer to what people might think about all this and it involves the war on softwood lumber. Like all disputes there is some truth on both sides. Even though the BC MOF can cleverly buffalo its citizens to believe the line which the previous post does which is the script notes which coleman recites--the US trade lawyers examine these issues on a much deeper level. We will never shake off the the softwood war until we shake off this corporate--government collusion, will we?
Sorry dogs I forgot the most important point which involves your point #5 "the high price of fuel".
This is a great example of what is the end game of monopolies in an industry--the time when a few corporations have reached the levels of controls--of the natural resource--and the governments which regulate them. When the supply and demand is throttled--when the information about supply and demand is manipulated-and a time when nothing short of a military type eviction of these companies from a country can change it.
A handfull of executives are now in control of the world's economy through the price of oil and their greedy shareholders are loving it. Governments such as Alberta and Canada are nutless at doing anything but serving these company's exploitation. The royalty which alberta recieves from the tar sands is two bucks a barrel and when they uttered the thought that these rates might go up-the industry went bizerk---threatened to leave.
Just what exactly is in it for us dumb canadians to liquidate our natural resourses at the lowest possible price?
Oil being a completely different thing than a renewable resource such as timber in that even if you don't charge enough the first time you can charge again when the trees grow back.When this oil is gone-its gone and whatever this public resource could do for canada will be gone.We have sold control to foreign owners which profit about 100 dollars a barrel while we get two friggin bucks royalty that goes to the coffers of our brilliant government?
Our entire economy is going to be on its knees as agriculture dies--as mining dies as tourism dies and as forestry and fishing also dies. The person which lives in the far north won't be able to afford transportation or likely heating fuels.Our federal and provincial governments have the same sort of simple explantion which as dogs does about the wood industry.
Its supply and demand--its world prices--its china and india consuming more-its refining capacity. Well its more a case of corporate greed--short sighted governments willing to tax the hell out of us at the gas pump, add a carbon tax to make sure we are really hurting--hide behind a green plan which is going to bankrupt everything but these foreign owned oil companies. Our governments say that the GDP looks good--kinda like a smile on a dead guy, isn't it? This is what is in store for the future of the wood industry as well.