Clear Full Forecast

Police Investigating Police Just Doesn't Wash

By Ben Meisner

Tuesday, June 10, 2008 03:49 AM

This is  part 2 of a  four part  series on the  inquest in  Williams Lake into the police shooting death of  Don Lewis. In part one,  Meisner looked at the credibility of  the Constable's version of events.

Part 2 

When you look around the gallery at a Coroner’s Inquest, it’s not hard to understand how the public is getting more and more turned off in the manner that police conduct an investigation of themselves.

Case in point , in a gallery of 18 at the inquest of Don Lewis, at one point there were nine police officers including two RCMP media types, (I will have more to say about that in a moment) two lawyers representing the RCMP and Const Brewer.  

On the other side of the room, the man in charge of looking after the inquest hall etc., four media types covering the story, Sarah Lewis, wife of the deceased, Lynda Bush, whose son was shot by police, Dolores Young whose son was shot by police, Young’s husband, and one spectator.

Of course the RCMP wants to get the story out, their story . One of the media types told me I had reported the facts inaccurately. So I said please write down or E-Mail those’ inaccuracies’ and I will print a correction.

At the same time I handed him a written request that the RCMP provide to me an explanation as to why an RCMP media release had been made on August 14th, telling all just how the event had taken place and for good measure had added that well used statement, “following a violent struggle” I pointed out that Const Brewer had not turned in his statement until August 18th when he testifies he turned the statement in. I am still awaiting that E-mail .  I want to have a written record of the facts rather than a casual conversation.   

Now the police were saying that no one talked to Brewer, you know "can’t discuss this matter, police investigation" and all that ,  even though on the first night, 12 police officers were on the scene.  Given that the total strength in Williams Lake is 45 and all of the officers were not from Williams Lake, one gets the feeling of overkill.

When you have 12 people running around and you have just shot a guy and you have a Constable that is cut up, wouldn’t you want to know what took place? But of course you can’t talk to Brewer, you know, "investigation and impartiality and all that". So when you see him sitting there you simply say, “Hi Cole, Hey man how’re your carrots growing this year, mine are doing for nothing in this cold weather” Or are you, like the release suggests,  like the great Kreskin so you can read Constable Brewer's mind and what took place?

I’m sorry, if I were on the scene (and I know I’ll get the gobbledy gook that "we are trained not to be that way") I would have been poking and asking Brewer what happened. Hell I worked with the guy and I would have enough brains to keep my mouth shut but I would still like to know, but or course we are told differently. Police officers act differently we are told ,  unlike us they never talk.

If the RCMP wanted to take some advice, which they won’t , they would start by not trying to be so perfect, they also should be taking the position that they do make mistakes and those mistakes are better looked at by someone other than themselves. As for them being the most capable at doing an investigation. Look no further than at who they placed the most weight in testimony at the Kevin St Arnaud shooting, Const Ryan Sheramatta, correct me if I’m wrong isn’t he  the subject of an investigation into perjury in that matter?

By the police investigating themselves and trying to suggest that somehow they are able to do this without letting their own biases enter into the picture, simply does not wash with the public, media included. We all know that in real life it just doesn’t happen that way and the police officers of this country are just one of us.

If you add in a further note of an RCMP officer who, while he may be the brother of the Cole Brewer, grabs a police vehicle and heads off from Vancouver Island to Williams Lake  to be with his brother , it adds yet another nail in the coffin.

What useful purpose could using a police vehicle serve in getting you to the scene, other than to perhaps get you there faster without fear of being stopped for speeding on any other violation and further you would, if you were me, be able to listen to the police radio that is relaying information about your brother.  That to me would come in handy, but then I’m sure that Cole’s brother did not turn the police radio on.  The spin I got on that one left me silly. "We will have to look into the matter to see if he paid for his own gas". “To Hell you Say!”

If this is the attitude of the RCMP in these matters they will find that their approval rating will not get any better in the future.

Just as the media have lost their place in society, once you lose it, it’s a bit like youth, you never get it back.

I’m Meisner and that’s one man’s opinion.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Good article Ben. But the force is a brotherhood. I believe officers arrive in droves to be lookie-loos, akin to the civilians who have to stop and admire the carnage at motor vehicle crash scenes. Or perhaps some officers failed the prerequisite Regina course CoverUp 101 and need some refreshing.

Now on the other side of the coin, gathering at the scene of the crime may also have a benefit, perhaps call it real life training. You view the scene and can establish your own viewpoint, strategy, concerns, and other options. Plus free coffee and dognuts.

Now what? So let me get this straight, you are a cop, kill someone, get an inquest, ruled as a homicide, carry on business as usual. Justifiable or accidental homicide?
No wonder these young boys want to become police officers, you can get away with Murder.

Now the civilian version. Kill a police officer, straight to trial, found guilty of homicide, go directly to the brickhouse.

Is the inquest process now becoming a means of avoiding prosecution for officers? Appears if nothing else is being accomplished as the rash of unjustifiable homicides continue.
Excellent part 2! Are we able to read Brewer's statement so we can dissect it and share online what we notice the problems are? You know pass it around on sites for our friends and friends of friends to get a view of how things are ran here in B.C......
That's the inquest right there...sharing the constables/other officers words with the world. Have to make lemonade somehow.
Police investigating police simply does NOT wash!
I respect the cops out on the front lines, and I also respect the job they do.
But they are also human and they DO make mistakes.
The problem is,they are not the ones paying the ultimate price when it all goes wrong and when it does happen,the advantage is to the cop.
The dead guy doesn't get a say.
The only way I can see that changing is civilian oversight and lots of it.
It would go a long way to putting the RCMP in a better light as well,and stop much of the speculation and inuendo that is harming their once great reputation.
The public should never have to fear those in charge of our protection and the enforcment of our laws.
The word "coroner" is a corruption of an older word "crowner", and he represented the Crown, i.e. the King. His function was to ensure that all taxes, duties and responsibilities to the King were taken care of when someone died, someone important (rich), that is.

Today the Crown is the Province, and the coroner's job is to make sure the Province's interests are taken care of. An inquest is not intended to find fault or assign blame, it is to take care of business for the Province.

People assume an inquest has some judicial aspect because it runs like a court. It doesn't. That function would be taken care of by a judicial inquiry.

That is why a judicial inquiry group is needed, with authority to compel testimony and to lay charges in these kinds of cases, but especially in the St. Arnaud and Bush killings.
Bang on Ammonra!
Well put Ammonra! The inquest was top heavy with representation from RCMP. Fair and balanced needs to be applied here. The only ones who would fear this are those who have wilfully and intentionally disregarded police policies and the role they have been assigned. To serve and protect! I always assumed this meant the public, but perhaps it really doesn't mean that at all? Most officers I have come in contact with really take their jobs seriously when it comes to serving the PUBLIC with integrity. The only way to eliminate any vigilante officers is to have a transparent public body investigate matters such as these.
..."matters such as these". Maybe next time, pal.
We could always hire and train our own Police Force ( City or Province) then we would have complete control.

As it is the Mayor is the Chief Magistrate and the RCMP in Prince George report to him. In matters concerning Prince George he could demand accurate reports, or get rid of the commanding officer.


Funny they seldom use this power.
We can't get the mayor to fix our roads, how would we have any more control with a city force?
" if you were me, be able to listen to the police radio that is relaying information about your brother. That to me would come in handy, but then I’m sure that Cole’s brother did not turn the police radio on. The spin I got on that one left me silly. "

Utterly ridicoulous statment by meisner.Since when can a police car radio on vancouver island pick up the broadcasts from one near williams lake? Answer: it can't. Did you ever stop to think that Brewer's brother got permission to use police transport? I know of one member whoose wife had a brain embolism in a parking lot in Prince George and was transported to Vancouver. The RCMP made their jet available to the distraut husband so he could travel to vancouver. That is a human decision. If your going to get out of whack because a decision was made based on pure human kindness on the part of one superior who allowed a member to use police transport (which may be in policy) then piss off!