Clear Full Forecast

Sarah Lewis Speaks Out

By Submitted Article

Tuesday, June 10, 2008 03:50 AM

The following  article comes from Sara Lewis, (in photo at right) the widow of Donald Dwayne Lewis, who was shot to death by Constable Cole Brewer  in McLeese Lake  on August 13th, 2006.

This week I was surrounded by the love and support of two brave and war weary soldiers, Linda Bush and Dolores Young, tromping through the muck of an ancient government system called a ' coroners inquest'.  There was no macho bravado here, only the tears and heartache of mothers who had watched their sons die in police related killings without cause. Now I was to join the ranks of people who fight against an system designed to protect itself. 

The 'coroners inquest' is deemed fact finding and not fault finding.  But all through the proceedings, you could hear the underlying questions:  Why did these men die?  Whose fault was it?  We are presented with the facts, but no guilt is established. 

Coroner Shane Demeyer leads the inquest, sitting quietly at the front, directing the show, but gives no results or directives at the end.  We swear on the Bible, we give our testimony, we challenge others in their testimony, but the rcmp still walk away, exonerated from any fault once again. 

The reason these three men died?   Ian Bush, Don Lewis, and Kevin St.Arnaud  all were deemed to be resisting arrest, a common reaction when your freedom is about to be taken away.  The average mind of a human, when placed in a state of desperation or fear, usually reacts in a similar way.  They run or retaliate.  Ask yourself, what would you do?

Hiding behind the law of using 'lethal force', an officer can exact any kind of behavior control that he wishes.  In the back of his mind, he knows that the gun remains in his power and can be used in extreme circumstances.  But what about these young boys, who already may have been known to police?  How do we know we are not dealing with an old grudge match from the past unless we look at the facts.  We've all seen power trips in our lives, and domination in the school yard.  Does it extend into adulthood?  You bet.

Don Lewis had crossed the border numerous times, and without the permission of the government.  Each time the police tried to apprehend him, he was able to slip away.  This made them pursue him with even greater determination.  Fueled by an angry and spiteful ex-husband, the chase went on.   

Through a series of consequences Don had been killed.  Did the police know that Don would run and seek to scare him?  Why did the rcmp pursue him with such a vengence?  Many Americans reside in Canada illegally.  Most of them are living peaceful lives, fleeing their country from fear of being drafted.

We learned this week of the many arrests and deportations Don had to endure.  He was treated harshly without reason.  Why are the police allowed to abuse prisoners?  Don was deported and left in Blaine, with no money, ID, no drivers license, not even a coat.  How was he supposed to survive?  Ask yourself this: would you not also return to your wife and home you had made?

It gets down to Human Rights, do we have the right to live in another country if we are legally married and applying for status as a Canadian?   Don was.   But we shouldn't have to die for it.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Well written Sara. My condolences.
NO, you don't have any rights to live in a country just because your married to someone from that country...plain and simple.

The man was here illegally on numerous occassions SO it's obvious he had no respect for Canadian Laws. We don't need more CRIMINALS in this country and from the sounds of things this one thought it was OK to assault one of our police officers.??
In all fairness, Americans as well as people from most European countries, and other countries as well may stay in Canada without a Visa for a duration of no longer than 6 months. Perhaps Mr Lewis flauted that time limit on occasion, hardly qualifies him as a criminal though. For that matter, we could just as well bring into account all the Immigration decisions rendered to date that are incorrectly dealt with. We could attack the Immigration services failure and bias on who and when to give Landed Immigrant status. Need I point out the thousands of serious criminals who reside here that have not been deported yet, but cost taxpayers enormous sums by exhausting the appeal process.

Nonetheless there is an underlying question. How far would you flaunt the system to be with a loved one? Seems hardly criminal, but I guess we differ on our perception of who and what a criminal is. The human rights of this country doesn't allow us to deport a suspected terrorist. Makes sense doesn't it?
" Seems hardly criminal, but I guess we differ on our perception of who and what a criminal is."

My thoughts exactly pisspulper. These slap on the wrist offences is what exactly they should be...a slap on the wrist. What cheap thrill do these officers get by excalating these matters?
I almost want to go through the training just to see, work for at least one year with my eyes and ears wide...taking notes and pics. of all the b.s. I see...little or big.
Well said pisspulper!
And I also think we are still missing another important issue here.
Ian Bush,Kevin St.Arnaud,and Don Lewis are all dead.
They all died in a confrontation with an RCMP officer.
They were not the first ones and probably won't be the last.
All were technically unarmed, except for the cop involved, who had a gun.
What that tell's me personally, is that losing a fight is not an option for a cop, and if that happens,how do they deal with that?
Does the cop lay there and say "wow,I lost that one!"
What comes next?
The unfortunate part is that only one of the two people involved in the scrap are around to tell their side of what actually happened.
And even if both could testify,would the police version carry more weight than the other guy's version?
That will always leave a lot of room for speculation and that is understandable.
It is reasonable to say that one should not resist arrest,but it is NOT reasonable to assume that if you do,someone has the right to shoot you.
It should never even get to that stage,and if it does,then somebody screwed up and it is not just the dead guy.
Having recently sat on the jury in a coroner's inquest,I can honestly say I was extremely disappointed and frustrated.
I felt controlled, and that the outcome would in fact be predictable.
The process itself gives the appearance of being merely a formality to shut people up, rather than waste money on a proper trial, and I sincerely doubt that any recommendations made carry any weight.
I am also concerned with the sheer number of RCMP officers who seem to have the time to sit through these inquests.
Granted,some of them should be there,but a large presence only intimidates those involved.
In the end,it is unlikely any recommendations made by the coroner or jury will have any effect on the RCMP and the way they conduct hteir business whatsoever.
Unarmed people who resist arrest should not be dying.
They should be in jail,even beaten and bruised, or heavily fined,but no,...they should not be dead.
Civilian oversight is the only solution that MAY change that.
When a cop pulls you over, you know who he is. When a cop pulls you over, he doesn't know who you are. If the cops know who you are it's for sure you know who they are. I'm afraid that there is a real lack of comprehension by the do good feel good public as to the realities faced by the cops and the people they generally have to "interact" with. The criminal today has more rights than the cop and the average citizen, and pull your head outta your ass if you don't think they know it! So when a cop tries to take a "person know to police" into custody you gotta believe that person is going to exploit the situation to the fullest. I wonder how many of the do gooders have ever been in a fight let alone a fight with someone who would love to stomp the life out of you. These guys don't say please don't arrest me or I will try to beat you up, but just a little bit. I won't really hurt you or take your gun and shove it up your #$$ and pull the trigger. If the cops walked away every time someone refused to be taken into custody how long do you think it would be before all criminals just said NO. Expecting the cops to say "oh OK".
I'm not advocating that anyone should be killed, but that's a VERY real outcome when the situation is that one guy has a gun, cop or not! People tell their kids not to play on the street cuz they could get run over and killed why don't they impart the same wisdom in a situation where someone (with a gun) is making demands?

This is not about right or wrong this is about life or death. People today are more concerned about their rights than there life and that's the message that parents have passed on since grade school. What they haven't passed along is the brutality of life and that life is NOT always fair and you are responsible for the decisions you make. By responsible I mean you accept the outcome whatever it may be, even it is not right...you are still dead. If you made a CHOICE to confront an individual with a gun you had some influence over your situation.

So don't be so quick to place all the blame on the cop, he was only part of the equation.
More BS......you and I should have a beer my friend. It seems we're some of the only ones who understand that we have to have LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS or else it would be bloody marshall law. Well said sir. Kudos to you.
"People today are more concerned about their rights than there life"

So true .... guess why .... because their rights are the ones which typically get taken away, not their lives ...

However, if this amount of killing continues, then they will be concerned for thier lives AND their rights since an RCMP officer is allowed to take neither away from a person except when they are in danger.

There is a duty of care that an officer has. That duty of care is to both him/herself and the individual(s) they may be dealing with at the time. In this particular situation, whether they knew this fellow was in Canada illegally or not, they had a duty to apply appropriate force AND they had a duty to minimize the escalation, AND they had the duty to STOP, when the escallation became inappropriate for the incident under investigation.

Thus, for example, police have the duty to stop chasing a vehicle if the purusit is likely to end up with major injury of either parties as well as so called collateral damge/killing.

Life MUST be given more respect by police, otherwise forget about China and all those other countries who one might accuse of human right violations ands start looking closer to home.

:-(
Amen to that Owl!
Oh great another anti-police site just what we need to cloud the issues with false hoods.

Fact - Police are only allowed to use leathal force if they fear for their life or someone elses.

Fact - If they use leathal force and they cannot properly justify why they feared for their life or someone elses then they have commited murder and go throught the same legal system as snyone else.

Fact - Police have little discretion on who they can arrest or not arrest (think traffic tickets) they are required to use all reasonable effort to arrest someone if they have commited a crime or are about to. Because of the high probablity of inocents getting hurt they stop high speed chases. Not because the Criminal might get hurt.

Fact - Coroners inquests are not a court of Law to determine who did soemthing wrong. Crown Console determines who goes to Court on Criminal matters, coroners inquests are only to see the facts of someones death.
Call it what you like Winged1 i'm just searching, finding and sharing :)
Wonder if this next link about the U.S. is what could be happening here in Canada as well???

http://www.november.org/stayinfo/breaking06/Muckraker.html
While I understand Ms Lewis' grief, I can't help but notice that she left out the fact that in addition to being in this country illegally, her husband also has numerous charges of assault on police officers in both Canada and the US.

"Did the police know that Don would run and seek to scare him?"
No. All the police knew was that there was a suspicious person camping illegally, and that the person who reported him was concerned about his presence. They didn't know his history of evasion or violence towards the police, they didn't know he was in this country illegally... again.

"Why did the rcmp pursue him with such a vengence?"
There was no 'vengance'. He was chased down in the same manner that the police would chase down any other person who bolts when confronted by a cop. While it is tragic that he died, it is the direct result of his own actions. He didn't have to run. He didn't have to fight Brewer. He could have chosen to stop after the use of the baton. He could have chosen to stop after the pepper spray was used. At any time during the entire incident he could have stopped, and he'd be alive today.

But I do understand that it is easier to blame Brewer than it is to accept that your loved one died as a direct result of his own actions.
All policemen have a number on their badges. Why not just put 007 (licence to kill) preceding the original number just so the bad guys know not to mess with the flatfoots with these numbers on their badges?
"The next day, the RCMP North District Officer issued a press release that said Constable Cole Brewer shot Lewis because he was "fearing for his life."

But on Wednesday at the inquest in Williams Lake into the death, Brewer testified he did not give investigators his statement of what happened until three days after the shooting.

Constable Brewer told the inquest he was "not in the correct mental state" to explain what happened for several days.

He also said no one from the RCMP asked him to give his statement sooner.

But an RCMP press release from the day after the shooting gives a detailed account of the events at the isolated campground, which were not witnessed by anyone but Brewer himself.

"When the lone member arrived he located a male in his forties in the area. While the details of what exactly happened are currently under investigation, it appears from the initial review with the member involved that a violent struggle ensued," said the 2006 news release.

"Our member used the least amount of force initially; however, he was unable to bring the male under control. Fearing for his life, the officer discharged his service pistol," said the release."
There's a difference, Heidi, between a statement - which is an official telling of what happened - and letting your co-workers and supervisors know what happened.
Ok so which one do we believe then Tim?
Who cares what you believe Heidi. That is immaterial at this point. What is important is that Cst.Brewer was able to survive the incident. I sincerely hope that he is able to put that horrible day past him cary on in his duties .It is plain to see from all of your posts that irregardless of any findings from the multitude of these investigations that you are desperately hoping for a policeman to be charged with some type of wrongdoing. By saying that officers get cheap thrills from "Escalating" these matters is at best a repulsive, ignorant statement. You state that you wish to go to training to take note of the BS that you see, well gal I'm here to tell you that you wouldn't have the courage or common sense to last a minute on the job. Lewis was the author of his own misfortune...end of story.
Wow Pete no need to get so angry. Why do my words get to you so much? If you didn't care what I believed you would ignore my posts. Wrongdoings happen all the time or we wouldn't have so many deaths. The day the unnecessary deaths get under control is the day i'll stop complaining about it. So it appears you may be stuck with me for a long time! Believe me I can't believe I do it either but it's what my heart has been forced into for the time being. When this craziness ends i'll stop driving you crazy. Easy.

;)