Clear Full Forecast

Resources North Receives Funding To Assist Forest Industry

By 250 News

Wednesday, July 09, 2008 06:02 PM

Don Cadden, Chair RNA and Jay Hill, MP Prince George Peace River  (Photo Opinion 250 Staff)

 
Prince George, B.C. - The Resources North Association (RNA) announced today it will be receiving a 5- year, $1.475 million contribution agreement from  Natural Resources Canada through the Forest Communities Program.
 
The RNA’s role will be to work with resource dependent communities, First Nations and industry to integrate their needs into land and resource management plans.
 
The RNA has been developed on the foundation of the former McGregor Model Forest Program which concluded in September 2007 after 15 years of operation. The RNA will pick up where McGregor ended. 
 
Don Cadden, Chair RNA says this is about bringing the right people together to help find solutions “We need to bring communities in transition the information by finding out what their interests are, who the appropriate contacts are, and what opportunities are out there and bring options back to the table to see where they want to go from there.”
 
The RNA has proposed projects in the South Peace region, Mackenzie, Vanderhoof and Fort St John areas. These projects include working with First Nations on biomass energy systems, integrated resource management, agroforestry, caribou habitat research and the effects of the mountain pine beetle.
 
Cadden says the RNA’s role will also be to search for continued funding, “We are looking for more funding from Provincial and Federal government, Northern Development Initiative Trust and Western Economic Diversification.”
 
The RNA will also continue its work with the Northern Climate Change Network, designed to increase awareness about new information, projects, tools and resources to minimize the effects of climate change on communities in central and northern B.C.

Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

If ya can't make money from cutting down trees, at least ya can make money getting handouts from governments. Integrate, increase awareness,finding out, bring options to the table,minimize effects, search for continual funding. Like I said. NOT cutting down trees. With dough like that out there, just for the asking, who needs a forest industry? We can talk instead. Less effort, too.
....and when will we see some results from these handouts?
I see lots of studies,think tanks,etc.etc. but let's actually see someone benefit in terms of employment,projects,plant upgrades,anything!
Seems these handouts are becoming an industry for a select few.
When do we get to see how and where this money is spent?
Aren't we fortunate that our resources are providing money to assist us during this transition time? Chester
Does Don Cadden still work for BC Parks?
Often these private incorporated societies doing the governments work are funded because they will carry out an agenda without political liability to the government, but working on the governments behalf. In many cases they are paid through fees, bonuses, salaries, and what have you that is double what the average joe makes going to work so s/he can pay the taxes to support the bureaucracy. Often as is the case they have a lump sum of money that has to be spent in order to increase the budget for next year and slowly the priority over time leans from funding the actual work they do... more so towards the compensation for these 'expertise' and the only watch dog around is the (unaccountable) BOD for the incorporated society that each are there because they have an interest in seeing their piece of the pie 'distributed appropriately'.

I'm not saying that is the case in this situation, but for the most part there is no other explanation for the majority of these private organizations government funded no matter how worthy the cause.

Government funding should be for government employees working in government programs that are paid the going government negotiated cost to do work for the public interest with full public freedom of information accountability.

The argument that government employees cost more then private industry is wrong when the strategy is designed to undermine the going negotiated government rate for the employees... while making it a wash and actually costing more for executive compensation packages.

Look at the UNBC presidents payout and think how often that happens with these private not-for-profit enterprises funded with government dollars that the public will have no freedom of information to ever know the payouts took place. IMO the waste is huge and it often involves political favoritism. Gordon Campbell is a huge fan of this form of government.
Well said owl!
I hear the jobless rate is falling in PG. Its from all the people being hired to do these studies and such. Also being rehired to study the study. Where can I get on this gravy train? Maybe I have to be a Gordo buddy.