P.G. Moving Up in Rating for Municipal Spending
Prince George, B.C.- Accordinig to the latest municipal spending report by the Canadian Federation of Independent Business, the City of Prince George is making improvements.
In its latest report, based on data from 2012, (the most recent available) the CFIB shows Prince George ranks 58th among the 151 communities examined when it comes to operational spending per capita. It pegs that spending at $1,540 per person. But that is better than the previous year, when the City was sitting in 67th spot.
The CFIB notes P.G. had a 2% drop in the amount of operational spending per capita from 2011 to 2012.
The report indicates that while Prince George has moved up in the ranks, spending has increased 27% in the 12 years from 2000 to 2012 and says the population dropped 4% during that same period.
According to the CFIB, the best community in the Province is Lake Cowichan, where per capita operational spending in 2012 was just $945 .
Among Northern communities, Prince George fares better, sitting in 7th spot. Terrace is listed as the best northern community, with operational spending per capita of $1,384 in 2012.
The worst community in the Province when it comes to operational spending? Stewart, where the CFIB says the community’s operational per capita spending was $5,771 in 2012.
The report notes “From 2000 to 2012, BC’s population grew by 15 per cent while inflation-adjusted municipal operating spending increased by 55 per cent, or more than three and a half times population growth.”
The CFIB is calling on municipalities to limit their operating spending increases to the rate of population growth and inflation.
The full report can be accessed here.
Comments
OK, two questions:
1. What population base numbers were used for the 2011 and 2012 calculations? If the population increased in 2012, then a drop in per capita spending would simply be a matter of mathematics.
2. How much of the decrease in per capita spending can be attributed to the downloading of the Quinn and Vanway Transfer Stations to the Regional District?
I’m always wary of statistics, they can be so readily manipulated.
Agreed. I’d also ask how much of the increase has to do with the off-loading of expenditures from more senior levels of government and how much of the increase is due to the non-stop expansion of the city as continuous new development on the western side of town adds to the infrastructure costs? Just why is a city like PG continuously expanding in size if the population is shrinking?
I only ask one question in this area. How much would we have to pay if we did not have 3 pulpmill and the railways in PG? Answer to that question: We would likely be #1. We are too spread out, play with the numbers all you like, other places do not have the industry taxpayer base we have. Not even close.
So as they say lies, dam* lies and statistics.
Yay! We are finally up in something! Too bad it is 27% in spending
Population of PG varies depending on your source
Metro population by BC Stats
2011 85,783
2012 86,348
2013 86,617
City population by BC Stats
2011 73,423
2012 73,941
2013 74,133
Census figures
census agglomeration (CA) was 84,232 (includes areas D,C,A and F and Shelley)
PG city only
2006 70,981
2011 71,974
City of PG website
2012 88,000
Comments for this article are closed.