Letter Request Stalls Council
Prince George, B.C. – It was on track to be one of the shortest Council meetings on record, until the issue of a letter of support for the Trans Canada pipeline project was brought forth.
In the first 14 minutes of the Council meeting, Council dealt with a presentation, two public hearings, two applications and several bylaw amendments.
Then the pace slowed, as Trans Canada requested a letter of support for the Coastal Gas link Pipeline and the Prince Rupert Gas Transmission Project, both of which are on the verge of final investment decisions.
The issue of whether to write the letter took 12 minutes to resolve.
Councilor Jillian Merrick didn’t see there was any merit in writing a letter at all. She stressed Trans Canada pipeline has done a great job informing Council, but, “I don’t feel the City has a direct responsibility in providing this letter of support. The reality is this project happens completely outside of our jurisdiction and we have several economic benefits that may come from the pipeline, but we don’t have much skin in the game on this and as much as we have a responsibility to investment in the region we also have a responsibility to our neighbours who are dealing more tangibly with the benefits and losses that this project might bring.”
Other members of Council took a more balanced approach, calling on the Mayor to write a letter that would support the project, but , as Councilor Brian Skakun noted, “not a blanket letter of support” as there are still issues that must be addressed, including First Nations and environmental concerns.
Other Councilors echoed their support for Trans Canada, but a desire to have the letter outline the fact there are still some issues that need to be resolved.
“I feel we are caught between a rock and a hard place” said Councilor Murry Krause, “because of what they can bring to the community, but also some of the issues that are inherent with supporting it.”
Councilor Frank Everitt said that on the one hand, the pipeline project could see Trans Canada expand its workforce, and some of those workers just might make their home in Prince George, but he too wanted a conditional letter that recognizes the environmental concerns along the pipeline route.
“Trans Canada is a good corporate citizen in Prince George” said Mayor Lyn Hall, but he knows a letter of support will be used to convince investors to put money into the project . “There is no question that within the letter , we write it and stay away from a template, that we do identify things that they presented to us recently in their presentation to Council around environmental issues, First Nations issues and social issues that have been brought up.” Mayor Hall says Prince George may be the only municipality along the pipeline corridor that doesn’t submit a template version of the letter of support, “I think that’s a good thing. There’s nothing wrong with us identifying some things that we want to make aware and may be a concern of ours, that they are taken care of.”
Council approved writing the letter of conditional support with Councillor Jillian Merrick the lone dissenter .
In all, the Council meeting from start to finish was just 26 minutes long.
Comments
The letter asked for was a letter of support, not a letter of approval. As Merrick stated, the City has no authority with respect to approving the project. They can, however, lend support.
Support, in my opinion, comes without conditions. Support comes for the merits of a proposal from the point of view of the supporter, irrespective of what viewpoints other communities might have. We already get a benefit from existing pipelines since TransCanada Pipelines has an office in PG.
Such a letter’s main function is to tell the reader that the City of Prince George, as a corporate body, not only has no objection to the project but that the approved project is expected to be beneficial to the City.
Approvals are the responsibilities of higher levels of government, not this City. It should go without saying that it is expected that the company will follow all approval processes and that the authorities who would be reviewing the project would do the due diligence required to ensure approval can be given.
I disagree gopg2015. I think the mayor is taking the right approach on this. Outlining the community concerns can still be seen as a part of a letter of support.
If it clarifies expectations than the company can use that as a basis for meeting its social license, and it becomes part of the check list for the company moving forward. If at a later date the company reneges on its goodwill, then the city has a basis to review its conditional support.
Comments for this article are closed.