Brink Under Water...Again
By 250 News
Friday, August 29, 2008 04:53 PM

Brink fork lift moves through water to move product to higher ground
Prince George, B.C. - President of Brink Forest Products, John Brink, is once again facing flooding. This time it is not the Nechako River, rather the deluge of rain that has hit Prince George.

Brink is blaming the raised River Road for the problem. “It used to be that all the water would drain towards River Road and be carried away by the ditch" says Brink "but since they raised River Road there is no longer a ditch and the culvert they have installed is sitting about a foot above the old pavement.”
Brink’s staff are now working overtime to move the product to higher, dryer ground. (At right vehicle makes a big splash as it travels through water on Brink's property)
Brink has been trying to come to terms with the City over the raising of River Road since the berm was put in place during the ice jam.
“I don’t know what to say” says Brink. “Once again jobs In Prince George are in jeopardy. No one from City Hall seems to care.”
Brink has his engineering firm (L&M Engineering) trying to work with the City now on how the newest flooding issue will be handled. Opinion250 has a call in to City Hall to see what if anything the city plans to do.
Previous Story - Next Story
Return to Home
WATER ACT
[RSBC 1996] CHAPTER 483
General offences
93 (1) Sections 4 and 5 of the Offence Act do not apply to this Act or the regulations
(2) A person who does any of the following commits an offence:
(i) constructs, maintains, operates or uses works without authority;
Quick licensing procedures
3.1 (1) In this section, "application for a change of works" means, in respect of a licence
(4) An application for a licence does not qualify as an eligible application under section 12.1 of the Act unless, before the application is considered,
(a) the applicant delivers or causes to be delivered, in accordance with subsection (6) of this section, a copy of the following to each owner, if any, whose parcel of land is or is likely to be physically affected by the applicant's works:
(i) a copy of the application;
(ii) a copy of the drawing referred to in section 2 (1) (k) of this regulation;
(iii) a copy of a Landowner's Consent Form in Form 1 of Schedule D, and
(b) the applicant submits, for each parcel of land referred to in paragraph (a), a Landowner's Consent Form in Form 1 of Schedule D, completed and signed by the owner of the parcel or by that owner's agent and to which is attached
(i) a copy of the application, and
(ii) a copy of the drawing referred to in paragraph (a) (ii) signed by the owner of the parcel or by that owner's agent.
I removed the city berm so my property drained properly. The city ditch was behind the berm. I could not be forced to replace the berm either as I can not be compelled to do self-harm by flooding my own property.
The local government has to expropriate land that would be flooded, or come to some sort of agreement with the owner. It's a pity that the owner has to be harmed first, no matter whether everyone knows you are going to get hurt. It's funny in this respect in that it is no accident, but you have to watch it coming and get hit first before anyone is forced to listen to reason. That's the law.