Clear Full Forecast

Skeena Sockeye In Trouble

By Submitted Article

Tuesday, October 07, 2008 03:48 AM

 

Terrace, B.C.- The International Conservation Union (IUCN) has added three Skeena River sockeye salmon populations to a red list of globally threatened species. One has been listed "critically endangered", one "endangered" and a third "vulnerable".

"This is a red flag for managers and resource users. It shows we need immediate, substantive action to protect Skeena wild salmon," said Greg Knox, Executive Director of SkeenaWild Conservation Trust. "DFO and the BC Ministry of Environment are taking this crisis seriously, but the pace of change must accelerate if we are going to reverse these alarming declines."

To arrive at its ratings, the IUCN grouped the Skeena River's 33 genetically distinct sockeye runs into five sub-populations and measured changes in abundance over a 12-year period. Among its findings:

- The Morice-Nanika sub-population has declined more than 80% (critically endangered)

- The Upper Skeena sub-population has declined 50 - 80% (endangered)

- The Lower Skeena sub-population has declined 30 - 50% (vulnerable)

The Skeena's Morice-Nanika sub-population - one of only four given the most severe listing of "critically endangered" - is important for the Wet'suwet'en Nation's traditional food fishery.

"The Morice-Nanika runs are at such low levels, it will be difficult to restore them to a point where we Wet'suwet'en can meet our needs," said Walter Joseph, who manages the Wet'suwet'en fisheries program and is a SkeenaWild trustee. "It's unacceptable that we have to depend on neighboring nations and non-aboriginal sources to meet our food fish needs."

Even within the two Skeena sub-populations not highlighted by the IUCN, there are concerns about individual runs. For example, the Kitwanga river sockeye run has experienced a 90 percent decline and is the subject of a federal court case between the Gitanyow First Nation and DFO.

The IUCN Salmonid Specialist Group - 12 leading scientists from the U.S., Canada and Russia - investigated 80 sockeye salmon sub-populations around the Pacific Rim. It found over half of the sockeye subpopulations assessed were threatened. Key threats included the effects of climate change on river and ocean conditions, habitat deterioration, mixed-stock fishing (ocean fisheries unable to target specific stocks) and the effects of hatcheries and artificial spawning habitat.

SkeenaWild Conservation Trust is working to make the Skeena watershed a global model of sustainability, with a focus on the wild salmon ecosystem and economy.

 

 


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Sucks about the salmon and what sucks even more is that you can not read half of the article. :{
Hey Raif where are you, must have something to do about farmed salmon even though there is no pens anywhere near.
Your right Seamutt, but that doesn't mean the pens in the south are being let off the hook for their proven destruction of wild salmon stocks and environmental damage.
The finger pointing needs to be at the person in the mirror.

Our whole lifestyle is to blame because of one overriding truth: humans worship money above all else. Every decision, be it land management, mining, housing construction, you name it, is based on the worship of money. This worship does not allow for the consideration of any other value until money is served first. Do you really believe clear cutting millions of acres is good for the fish? Hello? Do you think dumping million of tons of chemicals over the land is good for the fish? Could go on and on but it will do no good because this culture has already decided which God must be served and the Salmon are on the sacrificial alter to that God.

Good-bye Salmon.
I follow this type of thing pretty closely Qwaszxter and have yet to hear anything of the sort about it.
Please provide some links.
TY
Im just curious as to how many fish we are actually putting back into the river systems. What are the hatchery stats? You cant harvest vast numbers of a resource without putting it back. I think this has more do with the depleting numbers then anything.
I read the article qwaszxter is talking about but cant find it now. It is more along the lines of non-residents. The guides want to control all the lottery-licences but the hotel owners dont want that for obvious reasons (the guides will either provide thier own accomodations or change a referral fee to the hotels).

I say classified waters for all rivers, streams and lakes with a few exceptions. Sure classified waters are more expensive for residents but they are WAY more expensive for non-residents. They did this on the Elk River system in the Kooteneys and its significantly reduced fishing pressure and improved fishing in the region. And severe limits on keeping fish. I dont keep fish and it drives me crazy how many people do. Maybe limit it to one fish in possession with no wild fish of any kind being kept. And what about enforcement. I have fished the Copper, Kitimat, Vedder, Lakeelse River and the Fraser in the last year (20 days or so) and I have had my licence checked one time on the Copper. Seriously, how many people are poaching or not buying licences at all?

Of course non of this is going to matter as long as native netting is allowed!
Unfortunately it is not just the salmon in trouble. They have been advertising on the tv about over 1000 species are now on the critically endagered list. Bye Bye much more than salmon. :{ People are like a virus on this planet. Shame on us!!
set the example then, go live off the land and let me know how it goes. Its funny, you bleeding hearts see tribal peoples in Africa living off the land and shriek "oh how awful! Look at those dirty, malnourished children with flies on their faces living in absolute poverty, we must save them by sending them all the money we can and get them jobs and education!" Forget the Swiss Family Robinson, living off the land is barbaric. Period. Jobs and education mean one thing - pollution. To enjoy the things we have is to deal with pollution. Get a grip on reality - you type about how humans are a virus on your computer - how many fish did your computer kill? Hypocrite.
Ohh im with gamblor on that one.. A bitter spoonfull of reality! Go on.. choke on the lump in your throat you hypocries!
until you can control the climate and overfishing on the oceans as well as overfishing on the land the salmon will go the way of the dodo bird. Should look at what Iceland has done. They only allow sport fishing of salmon on their rivers and make more money that way than with a comercial fishery.
lostfaith its not proven and there is no enviromental damage. The area of the fish farms is no worse or better than the rest of the coast. I know that area quite well. I was against fish farms until I became more knowledgeable. I have been to a couple of farms and the fish looked fine to me.
I'm surprised there are any fish in the Morice-Nanika sub-population. Have you seen how the First Nationals fish the river totally clean in their traditional fishing locations. Nothing escapes.
Seamutt it is proven there is environmental damage.
All you have to do is look at the totally dead sea floor underneath and around these farms. Not to mention the virus that is caused due to infected fish.

I was against fish farms right from the start and now that the world has been given tons of scientific proof of their damaging effects not only on the BC coast but around the world, I am against them in their present form even more so.
All anyone has to do is look at what damage has been done overseas.

The largest salmon farming company on the BC coast is Marine Harvest Canada.
Marine Harvest Canada is a Norwiegan company responsible for the destruction of wild salmon stocks and marine environment in their own country.
Now they are here in BC doing to us what they have already done to their own in Norway.

The only reason those farmed fish could possibly look good to you or anyone is because when you look at them they resemble dollar bills.