Clear Full Forecast

Site C Focus Of Session

By 250 News

Wednesday, October 22, 2008 03:59 AM

Prince George, B.C. – The Site C Dam project proposed for the Peace River, upstream from Taylor, was the subject of a stake holders session in Prince George yesterday. About two dozen interested parties attended, and asked BC Hydro and project experts questions about the proposed project.
The proposed Site C dam is now in the second phase of consultation and a report is expected to be handed to the provincial government in the fall or winter of next year.
That is when the Province will have to make a decision about moving into the stages that would lead to construction of the $5 to $6.6 billion dollar project.
The stakeholders attending the session included recreational river users, First Nations, construction workers, engineers, and area residents who stated they just had an interest in the project.
While B.C. Hydro   says the power produced by Site C would be the second cheapest (next to geothermal) there is a mix of impacts by Site C.
Those impacts include:
Impacts on residents, forestry, agriculture, wild life, the aquatic life, may have climatic changes for the area and there would be some green house gas emissions related to construction and initial reservoir years.
The climatic changes would include a potential warming trend as water temperatures would be impacted, and that could result in fogging through the area during the fall.  That could also have an impact on crop drying.
Efforts to reduce the potential for the development of methylmercury (from degrading biomass underwater) include logging the timber in the reservoir area, and removing all debris.   It is estimated there is about 1.5 million cubic meters of merchantable timber, and a further 1.5 million cubic metres of debris that would have to be dealt with.
( at right, historical conceptual drawing of Site C dam, courtesy BC Hydro)
On the positive side, the dam construction could provide hundreds of jobs, there could be infrastructure benefits in the way of bridges and roads, recreational opportunities and dependable, clean energy.
Although Alberta’s Premier Ed Stelmach recently commented that he wasn’t necessarily in support of a dam that would   impact water flows  to Alberta communities, B.C. Hydro’s Dave Conway commented there are talks underway between the province of B.C., Alberta and the North West Territories about water rights, as well as discussions with First Nations, “We have identified 28 First Nations from McLeod Lake to the Mackenzie River who are also being consulted about the use of water issue.”
 The roads needed to access the site to build a dam would require a bridge and there has been some suggestion those roads should be left in place as a legacy for the region.    Questions about types of infrastructure that could be developed as benefits to the impacted communities can be accessed on a feedback form available on the web  
An open house on Site C is set for November 3rd in Prince George. It will take Place at the Ramada Hotel from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 pm

Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

I love that conceptual drawing of what it is supposed to look like when it is done.
Not!
I do agree that as much as we may dislike the entire project,(and I do) we need to get this done.
And when the Olympics are done and gone,government will be looking around for another mega-project and this will probably be it.
The real test will be in how it is set up and who will be the big benefactors of that power when all is said and done.
Somehow, it seems with Campbell and his love of big corporations involved,the people of B.C. will come out on the stinky end of the stick once again.
I think we need to pay very close attention to that.
Another stupid, backward looking idea. Humans are doomed as long as the majority continue to act like the year is 1880 and this project is as backward thinking as one can be.

The Chinese are the forward looking nation right now in many regards. For instance they are building in China right now a factory to build Maglev windmills which are the future, not this garbage of destroying more habitat for OLD ideas.

How many Maglev windmills could we build here for FIVE BILLION DOLLARS!!? Holy cow, what a bunch of hillbillies.

Google: maglev windmill. At least someone on this poor, pathetic planet is looking forward instead of all the losers that stay obsessed with the past.
We need more energy regardless of how much we conserve. I don’t want to see any harm to the environment but hydro electric is clean. There are draw backs with all of the clean energy projects. Including the windmill where they are killing bats because of the vortex that is created by the sails on the windmills. I know not a lot of people love bats but they eat a lot of insects, pounds of them over the season, including our ever loving mosquitoes and are an important part of our environment.
Kevin1006 you say the Chinese are the forward looking nation? You haven't heard of the Three Gorges Damn?
There is only one solution if your against hydro and resource development projects! Quit using electricity and consuming resources you hypocritical jackass!!! Yes that means you kevin1006.
kevinl006, A large mass of water will retain heat, however it has also been noted that windmills also has created warmer climates, due to the slowing down of the air movement. Thus they both have their negatives.

Truly the best thing BC Hydro has done is splitting the bill. Thus energy hog homes need to conserve. I like it. We were 20% over, but making minor lifestyle changes, i bet we can bring it down to average.

The province or a nation can not make a change, it is the individual that makes the changes in this world.
Is that a duck farting in shallow water again I hear?...oh..nope,it only kevin1006!
kevin 1006..Maglev windmills sound great but some environmentalist would surely find some fault with it. The site C project is the way to go. Lets get on with it, we sure could use the employment, ASAP.
Well said Kevin other than the insults. :}
Kevin windmills only generate power when there is wind. Wind power only has the potential to generate about 2% of our needs. China brings on one new coal fired generating plant a week, so much for clean power. Also the overall climate has been cooling for the last seven years so more power is going to be needed. People = power, more people more power.
The Chinese are scaling up the unproven maglev windmill to 5 kilowatts. Site C will likely have a capacity of 900 megawatts. That means only 180,000 windmills would be required if the wind blew whenever power is needed. How many hectares of land would be required for 180,000 windmills placed on ridges and hilltops only?

Actually, the entire Peace development from Williston reservoir downstream is perfect for supplementing wind power since water can be stored for use when wind is not available. BC Hydro should be complementing hydro power developments with wind power.

If you remember the last time site C was proposed, it was part of the McGregor River project.
By damming the McGregor, they could get 17% more energy out of the Peace dams. At the time two things concerned most of us. 1/ The mixing of the Pacific and Arctic water sheds and all the little bugs that could be a problem and 2/ the fact that they wanted to build on top an earthquake fault. At the time Hydro assured us that there was little chance of an earthquake. Then we had the March 21st 5.1 Quake. Where was the epicentre? Well, right under the proposed dam site.

So, is there a guarantee that the Mcgregor will not be damed or is the site C just the first step?
Don Wilkins ask the government, they are the ones that have the last word.