Clear Full Forecast

Robbie Burns, Mackenzie and Gaza – Some thoughts

By Peter Ewart

Monday, January 19, 2009 03:48 AM

Many people in Northern British Columbia have Scottish blood in them, and the same holds true for people across Canada, especially in parts of Ontario and Nova Scotia.  Indeed, at one point in Canada’s history, Scots were the third largest ethnic group, and they have certainly played an important role in the development of the country. 

 

A good number of these men, women and children are descended from the hardy Scots who were scattered to the wind in the 18th and 19th Centuries, sometimes driven out of their homes and forced off their land, sometimes imprisoned or exiled, other times leaving poverty and hardship, in search of opportunity and a better life. 

 

Today, the surnames of these pioneers dot the street names, business signs and phone books of northern communities like Mackenzie, Prince George, and Fort St. James, with the town of Mackenzie, of course, being named after the Scottish explorer, who was the first European to travel through these parts to the Pacific Ocean.

 

For these people of Scottish descent, and, for that matter, people of all nationalities, a special day is once again approaching.  And that is, of course, the birthday of the great Scottish poet and patriot Robert Burns, who lived from January 25th, 1759 until July 21, 1796. 

 

Whenever, I think of Burns and his immortal work, I can’t help but think of what he would make of events that are going on in Canada and the world today.  For example, what would he say about the dire situation facing people in forestry-based communities across Canada, such as Mackenzie?  Or the situation facing the Palestinian people of Gaza in the Middle East?

 

But before we get into these current troubles , let’s first talk a bit about this remarkable writer himself, Robbie Burns, the national poet of the Scots.

 

Burns was, above all, a poet of the common man, his father an impoverished tenant farmer, his mother illiterate.   He did hard physical work for much of his life (which may have contributed to his early death) and was largely self-educated.  Yet he somehow found the time to write some of humanity’s best loved lyrics, including “Auld Lang Syne,” which is sung the world over on New Years Eve, as well as the poems “To A Mouse,” and “A Man’s a Man for a’ That.”

 

One of the qualities that shines through Burns’ poetry is his natural good cheer and love of life, especially the traditions and habits of the people who worked the land, as in poems like “The Cotter’s Saturday Night.”  But he lived during turbulent and troubled times.  Just before he was born, the battle of Culloden was fought between the Highland Scots and the English army. 

 

The Highland Scots were renowned for their bravery and fighting spirit, despite the fact that they often were barefoot, carried primitive weapons, and felt lucky to have a couple of handfuls of oatmeal in their pockets for provisions.  But they were up against a powerful, ruthless and well-armed English army led by the Duke of Cumberland (later to be know as the “Butcher” Cumberland), and they lost badly.

 

What took place in the aftermath was what today we would term the worst kind of “war crimes,” “ethnic cleansing,” and “genocide.”  Highland Scots, whether rebels or not, were hunted down and butchered like animals, some being tortured or burned alive.  Women were raped and livestock slaughtered, and much of the countryside was left in ruin.

 

The aim of the English ruling class was to extinguish forever the Scottish national struggle (an aim, of course, which was ultimately unsuccessful), to the point that, for many years after, even wearing a kilt or playing bagpipes was prohibited by law and could result in jail or exile.   As well, prejudices were common among English and Scottish aristocrats who considered the Highland Scots, in their fierce desire for freedom and independence, to be “wild-eyed”,  “barbaric,” and even “sub-human,”  similar, as we shall discuss, to how the Palestinians are depicted by some news media and government officials today.

 

Later in the 18th Century, during Burns’ lifetime and after, Scotland was caught in the throes of the Highland Clearances, which is the name given to the forcible removal of Scottish farmers from their ancient lands.  The main force behind these Clearances were the Scottish and English big landowners, in league with government officials, who wanted more land to raise sheep and engage in leisure pursuits like game hunting, as well as rid the land of a rebellious population. 

 

Hundreds of thousands of cotters (small tenant farmers) were driven from the land that their families had tilled from time immemorial.  In some cases, Scots were sold by their own clan chiefs into indentured servitude or slavery in the New World.  In other cases, homes were burned to the ground, land was confiscated, and whole families were sent packing down the road, facing starvation, death, or, at best, an uncertain future. 

 

Some say that Scotland never got over these calamities.  Even today, a visitor to the Highlands of Scotland is struck by how depopulated and barren much of the region remains.

 

These historical events run through Burns’ poetry like the darker tones of a minor key on a piano.  Indeed, part of Burns’ universal appeal is that he was not afraid to speak out against the exploitation, injustice and oppression of his time, even though the threat of persecution and even imprisonment was very real for someone like him, who, contrary to his government, sympathized with both the French Revolution and American War of Independence. 

 

Burns was especially sharp in his criticism of the big landowners, both English and Scottish, who with their “tinsel show,” “ribbands,” and “silks,” held their aristocratic noses in the air, while treating the common people like dirt. 

 

For me these days, over two hundred years later, the Burns’ poem that often comes to mind is “To a Mouse.”  In that poem, the narrator / poet is plowing his field in the Fall with a hand plow and accidentally breaks up a wee mouse’s nest.  The mouse, of course, panics and scurries off, while the narrator, in good humour, apologizes to it for disrupting its “plans” and breaking “Nature’s social union.” 

 

At first, the tone of the poem is playful and humorous.  But it soon takes on a darker pall, when it becomes clear that “winter’s sleety dribble” is fast approaching and the mouse is without food or shelter.  The narrator notes that the mouse is not alone “in proving foresight may be vain.”  And then speaks the famous lines: “The best laid schemes of mice and men / Gang aft agley / An’ lea’e us nought but grief and pain, / for promis’d joy.”

 

Gripped by these bleaker thoughts, the narrator realizes that he is even worse off than the mouse.  The mouse’s outlook is limited to the present.  While he, on the other hand, can see what terrible things have happened in the past, and what misfortune might come to him, his family, and his country in the future.   Thus he speaks to the mouse:  “Still thou are blest, compared wi’ me! / The present only toucheth thee: / But och! I backward cast my e’e, / On prospects drear! / An’ forward, tho’ I canna see, / I guess an’ fear!”

 

When I read these lines, I think of the forestry workers and other residents of towns like Mackenzie and Fort St. James in BC, and Smith Falls in Newfoundland.  They, too, like other “mice and men”, have their plans, their hopes, their dreams.  But they, too, are seeing these threatened by the cruel blade of economic necessity. 

 

Similar to the English and Scottish lords of the 18th Century, the big forest companies, whose head offices and shareholders are often based far away in other countries, do not want to have any commitment or responsibility to the people who live in these communities, and, indeed, care little whether they are, as one “expert” has put it, “marked for exit,” and scattered far and wide as a result of mill closures.  Yet, like the English and Scottish absentee landlords, these modern day barons of industry insist that the rights to the land, in this case the timber rights, stay in their possession.

 

But in the spirit of the Highland Scots, the communities are fighting back.  Just last Spring, the small town of Mackenzie had the largest rally in its history, with over 1000 people coming together to save their community.  Similar events have been held in Fort St. James, BC, and elsewhere in the country. 

 

And then there is the situation in Gaza.  The Palestinians who live there are among the most impoverished and oppressed people in the world.   They are refugees in the very land they have lived since ancient times, land which was ripped away from them by force and is now occupied by the state of Israel.  Recently, the few square kilometers they are crowded into in Gaza, has been blockaded, attacked and bombarded by the Israeli army, one of the most powerful and sophisticated in the world, supplied with advanced weaponry and the latest American aircraft. 

 

Criticizing the actions of the Israeli government against the population of  Gaza, Sir Gerald Kaufmann, who is Jewish and an MP in the British parliament, has labeled its leadership as “war criminals,” while an Italian Roman Catholic Cardinal has described Gaza as resembling “a big concentration camp.”  For his part, former U.S. President Jimmy Carter has characterized the Israeli system of discrimination against Palestinians as being similar to the “apartheid” regime of South Africa.

 

When all is said and done, the main “crime” of the Palestinians today is that they have refused to accept their second class status and fiercely resisted the illegal occupation of their lands, just as the Highland Scots of Burns’ day refused to accept English rule.  But, of course, truth gets turned on its head.  Somehow it gets spun that Israel is the “victim,” just as, in the 18th Century, the English aristocracy, with its gloved hands, crystal wine glasses, and fenced estates, claimed it was the “victim” of the “barbaric” Scots.

 

If Burns were alive today, I believe that he would still be standing with his beloved Scots.  But my bet is that he would also be standing with the people of Mackenzie and other beleaguered communities throughout Canada.  And he’d be there with the people of Gaza.  May his memory live forever.

 

Peter Ewart is a writer, instructor and community activist based in Prince George, BC.  He can be reached at: peter.ewart@shaw.ca


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

If anyone is barbaric it is the actions of the Israeli military in Gaza the last three weeks. Thats about as barbaric as it gets for a 'professional' military using Canadian precision guided smart bombs.

It seems that it is mission accomplished for Israel. They'll still receive 'home soon' rockets with zeal, but in the mean time... Israel destroyed all the remaining Gazan infrastructure... shook all the foundations of all the Gazan buildings to ruin with bunker buster bombs in the heart of the city... phosphorous burn aided bombing of the UN food storage... taking out UN relief schools full of children... 300+ children collateral damage... and obliteration of the media center to show that they are not beyond the reach of the IDF as well.

Once suppling the Israeli troops gets complicated and destruction is sufficient they call a unilateral cease fire so they can get their troops out under the cover of the cease fire. Mission Accomplished.

The Israeli's are the people given a second chance by the sacrifices our Canadian troops made in liberating their people in WW2. Canada fought WW2 against ethno-political politics and in fact played a central role in banashing that from global politic acceptability through the values we installed in the UN and NATO at its creation. Going from Empire to Commonwealth was Canada's doing. Israel has gone rouge to these values and the world will have to address this, or be condemned in the history books for the results. This war has only started IMO.

I think Barack Obama enters his presidency already stained by his acceptance of what Israel is doing... and as such his legacy has already been written before he even takes office.

Not sure though how to bring it all full circle back to the Scot's and the interior forest industry... I'll leave that to the next opinion.
These two following articles should exemplify the real debate on Gaza IMO.

This is the best article I've seen that brings the whole tragedy to scale from a Palestinian perspective.
http://palestinethinktank.com/2009/01/14/gilad-atzmon-israel-has-managed-to-lose-again/

This article hear shows the human scale of this event and the Barbary that goes into it.
Killed by Israel, Eaten by Dogs
http://uruknet.info/?p=m50888&hd=&size=1&l=e
Who is the 'bad guy' in this Gaza conflict. Where are the reports on the innocent lives being destroyed by Hamas missles? When we watch the news or read the paper there is alot of information on the conflict... except for reports on the damage and lives lost due to the indiscriminate Hamas missle attacks.

I have no opinion other than to wonder what we are NOT being told?
There is no bad guy, no matter how Eagle wants to spin it. There are atrocitiies being carried out by both sides. Truly a sad and hopeless situation.
There has only been 2 people killed by Hamas bottle rockets, but over 1100 Palestinians killed (5000 wounded) with Israeli F-16's including hospitals, schools, refugee camps, and hundreds of children... how can 2 people indiscriminately killed be compared to the killing of thousands with smart weapons? What about the pretext to all the violence by both sides (ie the land settlement issues)?

We don't see any of the reports on this because reporters are banned from Gaza (targeted) and under reporting restrictions managed by the IDF.
Mr PG I think they are all bad guys on both sides. I agree both sides are guilty of atrocities (as in any war).

I just think the news should be balanced and a crime should be called a crime when it happens no matter who it is that perpetrates the crime.

Hamas as the elected government of the Palestinians has failed the Palestinian people by not providing the Palestinians with a clear set of goals and a real moral policy that Israel would lose face rejecting. Hamas is not failing their people by resisting the Barbary of the Israeli's IMO. Its so one sided that Hamas has it within their grasp to do the right thing, but they are too poisoned by events that they can't see through the blood of their parents and children.

Israel has no semblance of responsibility or restraint... so it is obvious that both sides should not be allowed to decide on the terms of peace and it has to be imposed from a third party. You can not expect an ethno-political conflict to be solved by the combatants involved I don't think once they are this poisoned. This is where the United States is guilty and Canada has turned its back on its traditional role in global development.
All Hamas has to do to win IMO is insists on full equal citizenship for all peoples of Israel/Palestine under one constitution that protects everyone's human rights.

Reject the 'two-state' succor for what it is... an easy out in the short term at a cost of perpetual recognition of the continued ethnocentric policies.

Hamas would be falling on their sword for their people doing that so it will never happen. It has to be imposed by the global community IMO at the cost of outlawing the Israeli state until it happens.
Eagleone writes...

"If anyone is barbaric it is the actions of the Israeli military in Gaza the last three weeks. Thats about as barbaric as it gets for a 'professional' military using Canadian precision guided smart bombs."

You just don't get it do you, you terrorist lover?

What part of STOP launching rockets into my back yard don't you and your Hamas buddies not understand?

No I don't love Hamas. I don't even like them. For me its an issue of human rights and fairness. The part I don't get about stopping rockets launching is why do the rockets always launch after an f-16 assassination or something... so why not stop the pretext to the rocket launches in the first place... thats what I don't get.... maybe you have the answer to that?
Why are you all argueing with one another? There is no answers to what is happening in the Gaza, Africa or any other part of the world where inocent lives are dying over greed, power and ignorance. This is not going to end good and one day Canadians will live in fear as others do. It is only a matter of time so stop hating and start praying because times are going to change and many will suffer.

Have a nice week all!
Excellent essay, Mr. Ewart! Thanks! The endless bloody conflicts of Israel and its neighbours will one day come to end - and all of us may go down together at the same time if ultimate force is used.

One would think that the God that everyone is always referring to would have settled this a long time ago by allowing the ones with the most merit to prevail - instead of letting the slaughter of children go on and on for decades.

Violence begets violence. Where are all the wise men/women?

It is indeed very puzzling and troublesome...to some, anyways.



Sorry eagle those rockets were not being launched in retaliation for something Isreal had done.
Those rockets were launched because Hamas are TERRORISTS, period.

Why do people defend the actions of terrorists?
People defend the actions of terrorists, because the United States is so large that they will crush you if you don't agree with US policies and defend their actions when required.
click! A world record 13 posts before someone resorted to blaming the whole thing on the USA! There is a lot of BS out there, and in here, thats for sure. Misinformation is the word i think.
I dont think the rockets being used by hamas are 'bottle rockets' any more than i think the whole problem can be boiled down to Hamas being terrorists, and thats that. THe reason that this has been going on for so long is that both sides are right, and both are wrong.
The arabs and jews can learn to live together or not, there isnt a lot (read 'anything) that outside nations can do to impose a peace agreement which will last. As for us, well it's our right to moan and preach and ultimately blame our neighbour but in the end it's just so much more hot air.
While the atrocities committed by both sides in this conflict are terrible and the amount of human suffering is immeasurable, we need to take care of our own problems here at home before we can go meddling into the affairs of other countries. Both the US and Canada are messed up internally and we need to address these issues before we can commit to any outside extra-curricular activities. It may sound harsh. It may sound callous. We need to right our own house before we can commit to helping others.
Eagleone....bottle rockets? Please define. Pepsi or Coke bottles?
Maybe the people (what's left of them) can have another "democratic" election and vote Hamas out. Hamas leaders (safe in other countries) can ask the people of Gaza that old democratic axiom, "Are you better off now than you were 4 years ago"? Democratic? It is to laugh. Go on You tube and type in "Hamas ambulance". Geneva convention? Ya right.
"What part of STOP launching rockets into my back yard don't you and your Hamas buddies not understand?"

Probably when it gets to the part about "let me live on my grandfather's land".

Wars are most often about the acccess people have to being masters of their own house.

In this case, there is one house. The house used to have 1 person of Jewish decent in it and 4 people of Arab decent. 3 generations later (20 years/generation) it has 8 people of Jewish decent and 5 of Arab decent. The house is not only overcrowded, but the "ownership" as based on numbers has changed.

The state of Israel was founded on violence. 60+ years later it is still a state enveloped in violence.
Hey gus...just so ya know and don't get embarrassed again ...the word is descend as in descended from someone. The word decent is defined as respectable. Thanks? You're welcome. More reading wouldn't hurt.
A Palestinian human rights group has revealed that only 95 resistance fighters were killed in the 23-day Israeli offensive into Gaza.

From the 1194 Gazans officially registered as killed in Israeli attacks from December 27 to January 17, a whopping 1099 were civilians, the Gaza-based Palestinian center for human rights reported on Sunday.

Only 95 of those killed were resistance fighters.

IMO those are disgusting ratio's even worse then the historical 10-1 we always get reminded of. Considering you have 3 Jewish civilians to 1194 Palestinian civilians killed.

Also Gus your ratios are not all that correct. Your first ratio is pre Israel, and your next ratio is post Israel, but the post Israel ratio does not include the Arabs who have been forcefully removed from their lands and now live in refugee camps in occupied territory, so are no longer counted as part of the Israeli population.

The importance of the Arab majority in Israel/Palestine is that zionism vows to have Israel remain a 'Jewish State' thus the imperative to have a two-state solution or an on-going conflict to maintain the Jewish majority... otherwise if citizenship is granted to the displaced and occupied Palestinians... then Israel would cease to be a 'Jewish state' and that is unacceptable for the zionist criminal gang that needs a Jewish only population to protect them from their crimes against humanity.
The biggest danger from this situation in Gaza is not a genocide of the Palestinians, nor a wider mid-east war, not even a nuclear exchange with Iran... the biggest danger for us is the international precedence that are being established for the normalization of these kinds of tactics on civilian populations with the kind of total war weapons that are being used and the notion of preemptive attacks and assassinations for political purposes. Israel is creating the conditions for making international law meaningless and irrelevant to future aggressors that wish to use similar tactics at a later date in disregard for civilian populations.

With America's sanctioning of this they are in effect signaling that international law is subject to their opinion and not law.

Once faith in the expected norms of civility in war disintegrate dangers grow exponentially for everyone everywhere. That is a huge danger for Canada and the thing all of Canada's foreign policy was geared to prevent in the decades after the great wars.

When we Canadians championed the UN and Nato it was to avoid international situations of bilateral interpretations of acceptable international behavior... and to make international law a form of multilateral protection for all involved... and to date it has been largely successful dispite its failings. The games being played legitimizing the atrocities in Gaza undermine all of that. A crime committed this way on the otherside of the world has a direct effect on all of ours future rights as we all share the remification of the norms this establishes in international law.

We can not say 'it is happening to them, so it is not our concern' when they come for us we might not be able to use that same argument. In this way Israel is a threat to all of Western society and the values it is built on through established international laws.

Omart, Israel's PM recently went so far as to brag in a public rally for the war in Israel that he was able to get GW Bush to leave a podium in the middle of a speech to take Omart's call demanding Bush make Condi Rice abstain from her own bill that she wrote for the UN calling for the ceasefire. When the US Secretary of State can not vote on her own bill in a UN vote because it is vetoed by Israel, which wanted to continue its killing for a few more days with no further objective attained, then we know this is a problem that has reached a level that endangers everyones rights through their sovereignty of their own governments.

With Harpers unqualified support for these atrocities can it be any wonder that our government is also taking its orders on the mid-east issue from Tel Aviv... even if it is via Washington as a middle agent.
Waterboarding is a torture method which can be traced back to the Spanish Inquisition. The victim experiences drowning (inhalation of water into the lungs) and feels he is about to die. Often permanent heart damage results. The victim - if still alive - will say anything the inquisitors want him to say just so that the torture stops. The value of such *confessions* is dubious but the terror factor as far as fear of it goes is very powerful indeed.

Of course it leaves no visible physical marks on the victim's body.

Until now it has been classified by international convention as torture and punishable as such. However, statements have been made by some high government officials that is has been used lately quite a bit and that it is in fact NOT torture at all.

I expected our Canadian government to speak out and take a firm stand opposing this. That did not happen.

Pity.