Clear Full Forecast

Bell Says Too Early to Talk Job Cuts

By 250 News

Wednesday, July 08, 2009 08:01 AM

Victoria, B.C. - Forests and Range Minister Pat Bell says it is far too early to start talking about the possibility of cuts to public sector jobs.

Bell is responding to BCGEU allegations that the government is considering a 12% cut to the Forests Ministry budget which could result in the loss of up to 230 full time jobs.  He says the province has to examine all of the options, but hasn't confirmed or denied cuts to his ministry.

"We're working hard to make sure that we protect as many of the government employees as we can, but that said, certainly we need to look at all of the services that we provide within government and that we make sure that the services are meeting the needs of the public.  Our goal all the way along has been to protect jobs in the public service and we'll continue to pursue that."

Bell says people will know more details when his government reveals the provincial budget September 1st.

BC Government and Service Employees' Union President Darryl Walker says the issue needs to be looked at before the budget is brought down so that the provincial government can look at other available options.

"I think it's important to identify that we don't necessarily agree with it.  There are other ways of looking at the savings and there are also times, quite simply, to run a deficit because that's the best way to protect the services."

Walker says, per capita,  BC already has the leanest public sector in the country.  He says further cuts would mean a loss to valued services that his members provide to the people of BC.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

My guess is come September 1,there will be massive job cuts to the public sector work force.
And I also think Pat Bell would know more than he is telling,considering September isn't very far off.
He is also not saying much to instill any confidence in it NOT happening.
It is obvious that cuts within government agencies themselves won't happen,and the savings will be on the backs of mainly unionized working stiffs who find themselves unemployed.
Only time will tell,but my guts tell me this is not going to be pretty!
I also think Campbell would like nothing better than to kick the crap out of the BCGEU and what better time to do it?
I also hope for the sake of the working joe,I am dead wrong!
have to trim the fat...just like a good forest fire is needed by mother nature every once and a while to burn off the dead brush.

union=fat....see you!
Pat Bell's replies = damage control, tailor made by hamburger pattie solutions.
metalman.
wavoes,"union=fat"

Maybe it is "upper management=fat"

After what we have seen in the last couple of years with CEO's and upper management friends. Public sector management and business management lining thier own pockets, people are still brainwashed to think the problems stem from the common working man.

Unbelievable!
Maybe it is "upper management=fat"

Yea maybe. Makes sense. When upper management gets bloated and lazy they tear through canning people left and right, when the union ranks get bloated and lazy the union cleans itself out.

Oh right. That doesnt happen. It doesnt matter how lazy and useless someone is it is a royal pain to trim the unionized fat. The longer they have been there the less they do AND the harder it is to get rid of them.

Its practically survival of the laziest with 8 weeks holidays to boot.

And we wonder why we have productivity problems.
Union or not there are bad apples in every lot.
I have worked non-union all my life and I have seen many in the non-union sector that definatly do not pull their own weight, so to say lazy workers only work in unionized enviroments is not correct.

I have also seen many managers who are in way over thier heads but seem to stay employed using brown nosing as the tool for long term employment.

I have also seen managers get rid of good people because the good employee started to become a threat to replace the incompetent manager. In this case the union would have protected the worker for the good of the company.
wavoes,"union=fat"

In the education system in BC, the ratio of money spent on teachers to money spent on administrators is falling. This means that either a) the number of teachers is declining relative to administrators, b) the number of administrators is increasing relative to teachers, c) the salaries of teachers is declining relative to administrators, d) the salaries of administrators is increasing relative to teachers or e) a combination of all of the above.
The cost cuts have taken place in education at the classroom level. The Minister of Education and the BC Liberals say that funding for education has never been higher but it is not helping the students in the classroom, it is mainly helping the administration of the school system.
Way too many union types- cut cut and more cuts needed
This just confirms more then anything that the forestry sector is in a permanent decline, not a temporary dip. Oh well, forestry jobs are crappy anyway.
Why do you think forestry jobs are crappy gamblor. Is it because you can't get one & have to work for minumum wage or is it because you had one & lost it? I sense there is more. Also, there are lots of forestry jobs that aren't in the mills.
Pretty good chance all the layoffs will happen outside Victoria. The bureaucrats live in their own little private world down there and have no idea what happens in Prince George, Mackenzie, wherever. As another poster mentioned, the ratio of administrators to ground level personnel continues to fall.
I feel for anyone that has lost their Job and is loseing their Job , I still can't believe Rustads is going down I think its Union breaking and useing the times as a excuse,when things get better and they will, they will reopen non union.