Clear Full Forecast

Terasen Gas...One Man's Opinion

By Ben Meisner

Friday, June 10, 2005 03:45 AM

I was always under the impression  the people owned the resources of the province, you know that thing about, the “crown resources being for the benefit of all”.  Well come July 1st, (and it will be rubber stamped by the British Columbia Utilities Commission) we will see the price to heat your home go up by about 5.6 %. Why?  

Well the USA is expecting a hot summer so there is an anticipated demand for natural gas to run those millions of air conditioners. Did I say USA?  Isn’t natural gas supposed to be ours?  Should we not receive a special price and then any used for export would carry a special levy not unlike the lumber tariffs to cross into the USA?

We pay what it costs coming out of the ground along with a reasonable profit and then suddenly we don’t pay the fire sale prices that we have been. $72 bucks a year may not be the end, but we are being "$72 dollared" to death. What if it’s a cold winter in the central part of BC this year? Will the Americans take it on the chin and give us our gas cheaper?  Don’t hold your breath. We live in a climate that is far more severe than in the southern states where the bulk of the North American population lives and we are being penalized for using our own "supposed" resource. 

Slap a tariff on natural gas at the border.  If you want to keep our money for lumber, we get to keep your money for a tariff on natural gas, but then that would take some jam on the part of  government and we don’t want to exhibit it.  

Want a reason Mr. Premier or Mr. Prime Minister?  Well it’s cold up here in the winter and we have to try and extract that natural gas in spite of those conditions. That in effect means  we are subsidizing every industry, every home owner in the USA.  Those folks south of the 49th are always asking us, "How can you ever live in that cold climate? “  Well without us doing just that, there is no natural gas.  So you pay the tariff and the tariff goes to offset what is a case of Canadians subsidizing the USA with our natural resources.  Give us back that money and reduce our heating costs. 

There also is the matter of us folks in P.G.  Terasen brags about being a world wide company but it borrowed a bunch of money from us.  The city says that cash is now coming back in even larger amounts than they thought. Well if you need some more to give to the city, simply show up at the BCUC and plead the fact you’re not making any money, and shazam, here comes an price increase. Taxation in a round about way?  You betcha!  Bear in mind of course that we are still paying off that $600 grand the city dropped to sell you on the idea of loaning Terasen the money and another little pail full to Kelowna for using ”their idea “. 

So come July 1st, when your gas bill goes up some more because someone south of the 49th needs to beat the heat, 
just remember the people of British Columbia own the resources, don’t we? 

That is one man's opinion.
Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

it's not just your view Ben.

This exercise on the natural gas issue is one that preps you for how you will be dealing with BC HYdro electricity costs.

Instead of keeping rates tolerable and spending on the infrastuture, the idealization, had to be changed? To letting other businesses run the crown corporation.

So instead of having to say it was sold, they know full well that it has been broken up and run by other businesses.

Yet we still own it?

Any energy production that is sold back to the grid should go to benefit the citizens of British Columbia, and not force the citizens to compete for this on the american market.

That's where they will put this extra energy up for sale. Competitively, we will have to pay the same rate someday.

So now look at how you are being charged for your natural gas. Fools, and any who supported the Terasen gas deal, were profiteers as much as the Two tier system of healthcare is motivated.

Capitalists who will "steal the canadian soul" in order to profit.
LOU DOBBS, CNN ANCHOR: Good evening, everybody. Tonight, an astonishing proposal to expand our borders to incorporate Mexico and Canada and simultaneously further diminish U.S. sovereignty. Have our political elites gone mad? We'll have a special report. blood.

DOBBS: Border security is arguably the critical issue in this country's fight against radical Islamist terrorism. But our borders remain porous. So porous that three million illegal aliens entered this country last year, nearly all of them from Mexico.

Now, incredibly, a panel sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations wants the United States to focus not on the defense of our own borders, but rather create what effectively would be a common border that includes Mexico and
Canada.

Christine Romans has the report.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

CHRISTINE ROMANS, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): On Capitol Hill, testimonycalling for Americans to start thinking like citizens of North America and treat the U.S., Mexico and Canada like one big country.

ROBERT PASTOR, IND. TASK FORCE ON NORTH AMERICA: The best way to secure the United States today is not at our two borders with Mexico and Canada, but at the borders of North America as a whole.

ROMANS: That's the view in a report called "Building a North American Community." It envisions a common border around the U.S., Mexico and Canada in just five years, a border pass for residents of the three countries, and a freer flow of goods and people.

Task force member Robert Pastor.

PASTOR: What we hope to accomplish by 2010 is a common external tariff which will mean that goods can move easily across the border. We want a common security perimeter around all of North America, so as to ease the travel of
people within North America.

ROMANS: Buried in 49 pages of recommendations from the task force, the brief mention, "We must maintain respect for each other's sovereignty." But security experts say folding Mexico and Canada into the U.S. is a grave breach of that sovereignty.

FRANK GAFFNEY, CENTER FOR SECURITY POLICY: That's what would happen if anybody serious were to embrace this strategy for homogenizing the United States and its sovereignty with the very different systems existing today in Canada and Mexico.

ROMANS: Especially considering Mexico's problems with drug trafficking,human smuggling and poverty. Critics say the country is just too far behind the U.S. and Canada to be included in a so-called common community. But the task force wants military and law enforcement cooperation between all three countries.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Indeed, an exchange of personnel that bring Canadians and Mexicans into the Department of Homeland Security.

ROMANS: And it wants temporary migrant worker programs expanded with full mobility of labor between the three countries in the next five years.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

ROMANS: The idea here is to make North America more like the European Union. Yet, just this week, voters in two major countries in the European Union voted against upgrading -- updating the European constitution. So clearly, this is not the best week to be trying to sell that idea.

DOBBS: Americans must think that our political and academic elites have gone utterly mad at a time when three-and-a-half years, approaching four years after September 11, we still don't have border security. And this group of elites is talking about not defending our borders, finally, but rather creating new ones. It's astonishing.

ROMANS: The theory here is that we are stronger together, three countries in one, rather than alone.

DOBBS: Well, it's a -- it's a mind-boggling concept. Christine Romans, thank you, as always.
Wakey wakey. IMO we voted the three liberal MLA's into power here in ol PG. How can we be surprised that Gordy Campbell and buds will sell us out. But don't worry if you havn't heard lately the economy is BOOMING in prince george so not to worry everyone can afford any ol increse. Oh by the way if you believe that last part you are still asleep.

Peace out brothers.