Clear Full Forecast

Site C Update Says Design Will Need Upgrading

By 250 News

Tuesday, July 06, 2010 03:58 AM

Drawing courtesy B.C. Hydro
 
Prince George, B.C.- The Site “C” dam on the Peace River near Fort St. John, is moving towards  the environmental assessment stage and in a presentation to Prince George City Council, B.C. Hydro spokesperson David Conway says Site C would produce enough electricity to power about 410 thousand homes every year.
 
Before making the decision to move forward with an environmental assessment of the project, there were plenty of public meetings, in fact, Conway says there were 121 meetings including  103 stakeholder meetings and 18 open houses.
 
There has also been input gathered from the public by mail, fax, e-mail, a Site C toll free phone line, and in person at the Fort St. John and Hudson’s Hope community consultation offices.
 
Conway says there were three main themes that surfaced at the meetings;
1-      Avoiding or mitigating local impacts,
2-      Interest in alternatives to Site C
3-      Regional community benefits, particularly upgrades to infrastructure such as roads and bridges
 
When it comes to First Nations consultation, Conway says there are 41 Aboriginal groups involved. During the second stage of the project review, eight  consultation agreements, representing 13 First Nations groups have been negotiated.
 
The environmental assessment and regulatory review is expected to take about 2 years to complete. If the Review process starts in 2011 as expected, Conway says design and construction would then take about 7 years with the dam up and running in 2020.
 
The cost estimate for the facility is still not certain.  The historical facility (shown in the diagram) was pegged to be in the $5 billion dollar range. There will need to be changes to the design to accommodate new construction practices and to reflect current environmental, seismic and safety guidelines for the design which is now 30 years old.
 
Councillor Dave Wilbur says  while he likes the project because it  will provide green energy and  will create jobs "I feel the need for a heavy dose of  consultation". 
 
BC Hydro's Dave Conway says 47%of the people questioned said they would not support the project,  tied with 47% who said they would support the project.  The  balance was undecided.  Conway adds the  percentages are not the result of any scientific surveying, he also  says there is no "target" in mind  of an acceptable approval rating from the public, rather, that is what the  environmental assessment is all  about. 
 
Hugh Smith, the Senior Environmental Advisor for B.C. Hydro says  he is not concerned about the recent ruling against Taseko  mines proposal for the Prosperity mine "That shows the environmental  assessment process is working" says Smith. In that decision, the Federal review panel  said  the impact of themine would be too great on not only the environment but the social and cultural needs of First Nations to allow theproject to go forward.
 
Conway says B.C. Hydro is already looking at  a "legacy" and what that might be for the  Peace Region.   There have been suggestions  of anything from a " preferred rate,"  some wanted infrastructure upgrades, something like fair share, or the Northern Development Initiatives Trust, something  that would  carry on and provide long term benefits  for the region.

Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Site C is being built as backup to alternative sources of energy. When the wind don't blow and the rivers and creeks don't flow where does the power come from? We the consumer are forced to pay 64 billion to Independent power producers plus also build backup energy, what a deal. If one looks into who is behind this scam it has liberal, ex liberal and their backers written all over it.
We are being fleeced big time and now they are considering bringing in smart meters which we will all so pay for. Which liberal backed company will supply those.
I'd rather see a nuclear power plant.
David Conway says Site C would produce enough electricity to power about 410 thousand homes every year.

Where will those 410 thousand homes located? That’s the size of another city somewhere. Imagine all the employment that would create building those homes. Would that be in the good old USA?
But then we don’t need farmland we import all our produce. We are just a cash cow for investors.
Cheers
Site C was resurrected when Campbell needed to quell the HST outrage. He thought that he could distract the minions with issues like Site C and by lowering the alcohol limit. Another case of the tail wagging the dog. Now in addition to HST,we get to deal with site C and all it's detriments. Cheerleaders of this next debacle had better listen to all the facts regarding environmental issues and the actuality of the project providing long term benefits to the citizens of BC, before they give the old liberal rah-rah refrain.

Do we really need site C? Who actually benefits from this undertaking? Remember BCR? We built it and the government took it and handed it over to American interests. Thanks for that.
This "resurrection" of site C has nothing to do with HST, those of us in the Peace have been hearing about it for years. Here's an O250 story for 3 years ago about it. http://www.opinion250.com/blog/view/7152/3/first+nations++vow+to+stop+site+c

Just becuase you haven't heard about it until now doesn't make it new.
Do you know what resurrection means? Grab a dictionary and engage some brain cells.
News flash, you don't have to live in the Peace to know about site C. You have a news story from 3 years ago...good for you, I've been following this for several years longer than that and I don't even live in the "Peace".
All the arguments for Site C were used when they built the WAC Bennet Dam. Cheap Power for Industry in BC, cheap power for BC residents. etc; etc; etc;.

The question is **Where is the Power** The answer is, we sold it to the good old USA, and they were happy to get it. Now if we want cheap power we have to build Site C, however you can rest assured that most of that power will also be sold to the Americans.

Any future Power Projects in BC such as Site C should not be able to go forward unless there is a gaurantee that all Public Buildings, Hospitals, Schools, etc; in BC get free, or very very cheap power.

This is how the BS scam works.

Taxpayers pay to build the WAC Bennett Dam

Taxpayers and Government entities are charged for power from the Dam.

Public Buildings, Universitys, Schools, Hospitals, pay for their Hydro uses by tax dollars paid to them by residents of BC.

Government sells power to the Americans, and puts money into general revenue, and then states that because of a power shortage we have to buy expensive power from Alberta, or run of the river projects.

Taxpayers pay more for this high priced power.

Under the Free Trade Agreement once you sell Power, or Gas etc; to the Americans you have to continue to supply them this power. You cannot just cut them off. So we are hooped.

I suspect that at some point they will close down the smelter at Alcan, lay off 1200 workers, and just generate and sell power. Much easier way to make a dollar.

Hydro would like you to burn candles so that they could sell the power you save to the Americans for big dollars.

The problem is, that in this Danny Dimwit Province, some people would be willing to do that.

Have a nice day.
Unless the Alcan to Hydro connection between Kitimat and Terrace is upgraded power flow cannot be increased over what it is now. See an upgrade to that line kiss Alcan goodbye.
The powerlines on Highway 37 are already on the books. No big deal to upgrade the lines to Kitimat.

Why havent they started building the much vaunted new smelter in Kitimat. Havent heard a thing since Rio Tinto bought Alcan.
"...however you can rest assured that most of that power will also be sold to the Americans."

Perhaps. But it happened in the past as well, except that the NDP got stiffed for a billion dollars worth of BC electricity it sold to California: it did not even get paid for it.

Heehee!
The powerline on hwy 37 has nothing to do with the connection between Alcan and the hydro sub in Terrace. That is where an upgrade is required if Alcan plans to export its full 900 MW.