Clear Full Forecast

Report from Parliament's Hill - September 3, 2010

By Prince George - Peace River M.P. Jay Hill

Friday, September 03, 2010 03:44 AM

Shale Gas: More Prosperity for Northern BC


Last week I discussed how the positive performance in the mining sector meant a promising future for northern British Columbia.  Allow me to further inflame your optimism by detailing what the exhilarating developments in the natural gas sector mean for our region…and our environment.

Canada is already the third largest natural gas producer in the world (next to Russia and the United States).  We currently produce 5.6 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) per year, 60 percent of which is exported.

Creating a “buzz” and excitement in northern BC is the big “game changer” in the natural gas sector... Shale Gas.

Shale gas is natural gas trapped within shale rock and was previously challenging and prohibitively expensive to extract.

However, with new technologies, such as horizontal drilling and more efficient "fracturing" of the rock, the ability to access shale gas cost-effectively continues to improve significantly. It’s estimated there are about 250 Tcf of natural gas in northern BC.

Currently the largest known shale gas field in Canada is our very own Horn River Basin which has attracted investment and drilling activity by EnCana, Apache, Exxon, Imperial and EOG Resources, among others.

What’s unique about the Horn River development is the level of cooperation among all stakeholders.  Members of the Horn River Basin Shale Gas Producers Group work closely with the Northern Rockies Regional Municipality, the Town of Fort Nelson and First Nations communities to address concerns and needs so that our ability to seize these new opportunities remains ‘on track’.

This includes heeding the experiences of Fort McMurray and avoiding the ‘downside’ of development.  That’s vital for an area where it’s expected that upwards of 5,000 wells could be drilled over the next decade!

Natural Gas emits about half of the carbon dioxide emissions as conventional coal plants.  When you consider that China is currently constructing the equivalent of two, 500 megawatt, coal-fired plants per week, the drive to get our natural gas to Asian markets should be a priority for ALL of us.

That requires cooperation in advancing natural gas production AND in promoting the Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) supply chain.  Delivered through pipeline systems to an LNG facility, where it’s liquefied, or chilled, natural gas becomes a clear, colourless, odourless, non-corrosive and non-toxic liquid, which is feasible to transport long distances via ocean tankers, for example.  Once it reaches its destination, LNG is re-gasified and transported via pipeline to users.

Essential to converting BC’s natural gas to clean energy in the Pacific Rim are two key projects:  the LNG terminal at Kitimat and Pacific Trail’s Kitimat-Summit Lake pipeline loop which will connect Spectra Energy’s Westcoast pipeline system to the Kitimat terminal.

These transmission initiatives should be where the interests of natural gas producers, pipeline companies and environmental groups naturally converge.

And, speaking of Spectra, once again they've demonstrated their historic commitment to our region when just last week their directors travelled from all over North America to hold their meetings in Fort Nelson.

Shale gas and the LNG supply system, as a means to deliver clean energy, are not only key to our region’s economic future, they are vital to the future of our planet!


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Jay Hill neglects to mention another benefit to residents of shale gas areas. These folks will be able to heat their homes by igniting the methane coming from their water taps.
Jay Hill also fails to mention that the Kitimat terminal is an EXPORT/IMPORT facility, a vast hub which will receive LNG from Australia, Malasia and Russia to hook into the new pipeline which functions in a bi-directional manner. It will assure a continuous LNG supply to the Alberta tarsands oil extraction industry while at the same time having the capacity to export and/or re-export LNG. The pipeline will gather up shale gas from numerous compressor feeder stations along the way.

-------------------------------------------

"Kitimat LNG Inc is a subsidiary of Galveston LNG (there is also a possibility that a 250MW to 500MW combined cycle cogen power plant may be developed next to the LNG terminal). The new terminal will have access to the natural gas market via its own associated Pacific Trail Pipeline which will link in not only to the Spectra Energy Transmission Pipeline (formerly Duke Energy) but also the Alliance Pipeline and the TransCanada Pipeline.

The new terminal will also provide natural gas supply for some large industrial users such as the Canadian oil sands projects in Alberta and also power supply companies. The pipeline project was originally called the Kitimat to Summit Lake Looping Project (KSL Project)."

"The pipeline project consists of a looping of the existing PNG pipeline between Kitimat and Summit Lake to increase capacity from 115 to 1,000 million cubic feet of natural gas a day and operate a bi-directional pipeline system (east-west and west-east). There will be one compressor station on the new loop system and it will be able to vastly increase the transport of gas across the Province."

Where to ? To the ever increasing oil production of the tarsands, of course. Our per person individual carbon footprint will be ever increasing as will be the carbon taxes we will be forced to pay for our *bad* behaviour.
Jay Hill did not fail to mention anything as he never penned this blurb nor did he probably ever read it.
Right you are! I forgot that he has a script writer!
"More prosperity for BC"? That would mean a FALLING price for natural gas to BC consumers. But what are we likely to get out of all this? Some new jobs, yes. But far more likely a greater disparity between the overall costs the incomes from those jobs, and every existing job, have to liquidate through prices (and taxes). How is that going to benefit us?
I foresee Jay going to the Board of Directors of Spectra in the near future.

Shale gas extraction is one of the most destructive sources of energy from the environment that exists today. It poisons whole complete watersheds, which is why they propose to do it where they are.

The idea that exporting this gas to China to reduce their emissions... and thus improve the environment... seems to follow the logic that we will completely contaminate the Mackenzie watershed, and pay the carbon tax to do it... so as to enrich multinational energy companies and empower the Chinese economy to have a source of cheep fuel in which to compete with our economy, thereby increasing their carbon dependence which will reduce their carbon emissions....

I think what it really comes down to is greed and not sustainability of our own overall economy here in North America. The costs for this folly will be picked up by us the middle class working Canadians, and the profits will go to government bureaucrats and foreign multinational financiers.