Winter Olympics Already Over Budget
By Ben Meisner
Thursday, July 07, 2005 03:37 AM
In recent days we have been getting sort of a sneak peek at what we can expect to hear in the coming months, and that is, the $690 million dollars set aside for the Olympics may not be quite enough money.
The 2010 Olympic Committee is now saying it may have to scale back on some venues that were set for construction in order to make budget. That’s a nice way of saying its only 2005 and you can expect to dig a bit deeper into your pockets in order to put this affair on.
We have five years to go and already, Committee members are scaling back, most venues will not be ready until the very least 2007, some as late as 2009.
So what does that all mean for us folks out here in the 250, (pardon me, I should have said, "Heartland")?
Well we will need more heart and of course more resource revenue in order to top up that fund. Never mind that we gave up BC Rail to enable the government to twin the Whistler Highway which was a sore spot for the Olympic Committee, we will reap huge rewards in the hundreds of thousands (well maybe not that many) several thousand, (well maybe not) well, be prepared for a few hundred making their way into this city come the Olympics. In return we will shell out a hundred million in tax revenue for the affair.
It all reminds one back when Expo 86 was on and we were told to get ready for the rush of humanity that was heading to Prince George Well we made a brand new flower bed, spruced the place up and waited, and waited and waited and no one came.
Of course in this instance we are being told things will be different.
That, is one man's opinion.
Previous Story - Next Story
Return to Home
These olympics are a waste of money. If the folks in the 604 wanted it so badly, then I say let the folks in the 604 pay for it.
Why should I have to pay for something for the next 5 years, when in reality the average ticket price for events will be out of my price range?
I'd rather pay my money to the local sports that we have right here.