Clear Full Forecast

Community Forest Agreement O.K.

By 250 News

Friday, September 08, 2006 09:45 AM

    

The City of Prince George is one step closer to starting to harvest beetle killed trees on Crown Land. 

A Community Forest Agreement licence has been issued by the Ministry of Forest and Ran.  The  five year licence will allow the City to harvest  up to 12,000 cubic meters per year from Crown land, that works out to about 266 truck loads.

But, just because the licence is approved, that doesn't mean the harvesting will start tomorrow. 

There still needs to be a management plan approved,  then a Forest Stewardship plan, and then there's the cutting permit process. 

Normally, these steps are taken one after another, but recognizing the urgency in trying to reduce the risk from fire from dead beetle trees, the Ministry has allowed the City to go through all four steps concurrently.  If all goes well, the  first activity  will likely start late November or early December of this year.

The City of Prince George's Environmental Department Manager, Mark Fercho says residents will see two major projects happening. "First, we will continue with the removal of dead beetle trees from high hazard areas, and then there will be harvesting on larger cut blocks on Crown land further away from urban areas"

Over the winter, special prescriptions will be developed for areas which are more complex "Those are areas where harvesting might impact waterflows, slopes, viewscapes, or may be too close to homes and hydro lines.  They are the areas that require non traditional harvest methods." says Fercho.

The license will be reviewed in two years at which time, Council will review the licence.  "There are other  benefits to this licence" says Fercho.  While the originial intent and initial focus wil be on reducing the risk of fire,  the  licence allows the City to  open up access to recreational areas,  and even develop a source bio-mass to fuel a community energy system.

There are about 4,000 hectares of public forest land within the City's boundaries.  In April of 2005, the City was given $1.2 million dollars to go towards forest rehabilitation and  forest fire fuel management.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Oh and we can't forget about the study...

I feel that if they cared about the beetle problem that something would have been done long ago
This sounds like another asphalt plant approval. The city is allowed to roll four steps to the approval into one just because it needs to be done right away.

Why is the city in the loggimng business is mind boggling. It seems to me that if its crown land the city should be on the provincial governments back to reduce the fire hazard if there is a hazard. The other question is will they do it right.

They used a private contractor to clean up the parks with beetle kill pine and all they did was kill all the understory which they had said would be "retained". It never happened. We are now spending more bucks to replant our parks. Had it been done properly the regeneration would of taken place naturaly.

Well you have herd it before, "you scratch my back and I'll scratch yours".

Cheers
I think in this case it is an indicator of how slow the province is to move on these things.

Licensees who have been cutting according to 5 year plans approved by the MoF have not been told by the Ministry that due to the pine beetle they will not be held to their cutting plans in areas where there are few, if any, pine stands so that they can re-organize their plans and cut in those locations where there are beetle killed stands.

Some licensees have, however, been cutting to get rid of the beetle stands in their areas while not knowing whether they will be fined or others will go in to cut according to the 5 year plans they agreed to before the beetle came through. By "not knowing" I means years, not weeks or months.

In my opinion, a pro-active MoF would have known that it would be best to cut the beetle killed wood first and keep the other stands for post beetle in order to minimize the short term effect of the eventual lower annual allowable cuts.

Just to show how far behind everyone is on this, the McLure-Barriere and Kelowna fires were in 2003. The Filmon Firestorm Report (yes, another report) came out in the spring of 2004. It stated: "The provincial government should lead the development of a strategic plan in cooperation with local governments to improve fire prevention in the interface through fuel management."

It is the fall of 2006. Three fire seasons have pretty well come and gone. Perhaps PG has not been considered as a high priority. Maybe it took the visibility of red needled pine trees inside the city limits to cause people to realize that we too have a potential fire problem at the rural-urban interface.

http://www.2003firestorm.gov.bc.ca/firestormreport/summaryofrecommendations.htm




"The provincial government should LEAD the development ...."

Just want to make sure everyone noticed who was to be the leader of the project.