Clear Full Forecast

Councillor's Night on the Street

By 250 News

Friday, October 20, 2006 03:59 AM

Prince George City Councillor Debora Munoz took up the challenge and spent a night on the streets, to experience first hand what it is like to be homeless in Prince George.

It was an eye opener and she learned she had to keep her eyes open.

“I found out I wouldn’t last very long on the streets” says the Councillor. She says she learned very quickly life on the street is a lonely existence and survival is the first priority. “You have to keep moving” Munoz told Opinion250, “otherwise you get so cold”

She tried to keep the elements at bay by grabbing some cardboard from a dumpster, and sleeping on a pallet in the damp and drizzly that carried on overnight, “It was nearly impossible to keep yourself dry.”

Although the participants in the Night on the Street event were given a survival back pack, Munoz shared the contents of the pack with the people she met on the street. Items like toothpaste, a warm hat, a cup-o-soup, and the backpack itself were welcomed by the people she gave her items to. “I was met with suspicion by the people on the street, they don’t know who I am or what I am trying to do” she says. “They didn’t know if I was there to take their things or what” Munoz says those who live on the street told her newcomers have to earn their place within the community of the homeless.

Munoz teamed up with three other people from local service agencies. “The shelters had been advised we would be dropping by, but they were full.” Munoz says one men’s shelter packed in 5 men per room, and at the AWAC shelter for women, she was told women were already being turned away because there wasn’t any room. “This was the middle of the week and there wasn’t any room.”

Munoz says she was able to set up a cardboard shelter for herself but she says she can’t imagine anyone being able to actually sleep “There was constant noise from the vibration of the trains, the shunting of the cars, the fire engines and alarms, and you could feel the vibration.”

She did take note of irony “There was a sign that read heated storage space available, I found it ironic that we would pay to keep our furniture warm but the homeless have to fend for themselves.” And there was the reality of life on the street “The biggest drug dealing spot in the entire city is right across from the Courthouse.”

What did she learn?

“It isn’t going to change because of just one Councillor or one program. It has to be an effort by the entire community with proper funding from the Federal and provincial governments.” She has come away from the experience supporting the need for safe injection sites. “Those sites can help save lives, I have seen some of the shooting galleries in town, and the sharing of needles, the discarding of needles on the street. Safe injection sites not only reduce those risks, they also allow drug users a chance to connect with drug counsellors.”

Would she do it again?

No.

“When my night was over, I was so happy to get to work to be in a place that was warm, a place where I could get a hot cup of coffee. I did the night on the street to get a snapshot of life on the street in Prince George, I did it to learn.”

    
Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Good on you Ms. Munzo, taking the challenge and describing how horrible it is to face just one night on the streets. Hope you can convey to the rest of the city council just how much Prince George needs services for these people. I work downtown and it breaks my heart to see the people lined up at the St. Vincent DePaul's kitchen every morning. The number seems to have grown and that is not something to be proud of. With the huge cuts to Social Services by the province, it would good time to show some leadership and have the city councils push back for all their citizens. Time to demand funding for these programs so that everyone can have a chance. The true reality of working for minimum wage is that you are one cheque away from homelessness.
One can learn so much more when they have an opportunity to walk in the shoes of others. Good on you Ms. Munoz. Chester
Hollow political sound-bite, "...I found it ironic that we would pay to keep our furniture warm but the homeless have to fend for themselves."

Who's this "we" she refers to? Surely it's not government spending our tax dollars to heat other people's furniture. Alternatively, the "we" she refers to would be all the rest of us who aren't political pariahs like her. In which case, most of us give great sums of money in both taxes entrust to people like Munoz and directly to charities to benefit the homeless.

Once again Munoz... who's this "we” you refer to if not political pariahs such as yourself who exploit the homeless to obtain sound-bites to promote yourself!
"Homeless rates don't go up on weekends like gas or hotel rates do they Debora?

I would not assume that. Even though for those who do not work there are no "weekends", society's timeclock still revolves around weekends and weekdays.

I would not be surprised if people from outlying communities hitch a ride into Prince on occasion on a weekend for a bit of a change and that some of them do not have enough money to pay for a room. Not true "homeless" people to be sure, but people who join others who are on the streets overnight.

Service organizations should be able to speak about the comings and goings of people.
"Surely it's not government spending our tax dollars to heat other people's furniture"

Who knows ..... if it is office furniture, or a business person "cheating" a bit by "pretending" the storage is for business rather than mostly personal goods, the cost of the storage may actually be a business expense. If the business has a net profit, then the business would be paying only about 80% of the cost of the storage and the government has a loss of opportunity of picking up the other 20%.

Did you know that calling Debora Munoz a politcal pariah is an ad hominem attack?
To Quasime:
Just thought I should let you know, Ms Munoz did not contact Opinion250 to see if she could get a "sound bite", or publicity for her night on the street. I am the one who contacted her, I wanted to know what she had learned, I asked the questions which produced the responses you are reading. Ms. Munoz did what every elected official should do, she tried to gain some knowledge. She did what I (and I suspect many others) didn't have the guts to do. I don't care about her politics, I care that a woman CHOSE to spend a night on the street in an effort to raise awareness, and to learn. Is it so hard for us to just say "good job!"?

Elaine Macdonald
QuasiMe

You state
"Once again Munoz... who's this "we” you refer to if not political pariahs such as yourself who exploit the homeless to obtain sound-bites to promote yourself!"

You sound very bitter.

I looked up "pariah" to try and understand what you were talking about.
"pariah" "a person despised or rejected by society".
I do not understand how that fits the descrption of what Munoz did.
I do not need to defend Councillor Munoz to you but for myself I think it was very brave of her.

I wonder if the Mayor would do the same or other Councillors?

We are all members of the same society QuasiMe you and the homeless and me and the Council. At least I know one Councillor I may be voting for.
Who are the "we" that Debora Munoz referred to?

I've seen some deliberately obtuse comments on this site, but really! It's a standard English language construction used when someone wants to include themselves in a generalised comment. The other one is "they" did something or other when the author wants to exclude themselves. But you knew that already. Your question was really just an ignorant put-down because she did something real and you couldn't find fault with it.

If you want to criticise her because of her politics, then be specific. This personal nonsense only demeans you, not her.

I worked with Deborah for many years, although in a different department, and she is a very nice lady who believes what she says. Spending a night on the street proves that. As for being a pariah, she got elected. That's acceptance.

Homeless people look forward to long weekends? Give them all the money they want. That will fix everything.
Fortunatly, "we" see a politician who is trying to understand the situation and make a very real difference. Quite a change from some who post here and do nothing but ridicule the efforts of someone else. Given the posts we see here frequently, it is no large surprise that our society has condoned the poor treatment of the homeless. There are a great number of people who's parents should have been slapped for not teaching them the fundamentals of one person helping another. I'm surprised these posters are even literate enough to read these stories given their level of ignorance.
Just read in the Free Press that Murry Krause also spent the night on the street. As I had challenged other Councillor's and the Mayor I did want to acknowlegdge Councillor Krause accepting the challenge.
A number of years ago a member of the NDP party tried to live on the streets in Vancouver using only the amount of money he would receive if he was on welfare. As I recall he didnt do to well. The aim of the excercise was to draw attention to the homeless and underprivledged in out society. 20 years later I suggest that not much has changed.

I for one do not have a solution to this problem and it is far more complex than just giving people more money so that they can get a good place to live.

Its easy to blame the Government of the day for the problem, or the City, or whatever, but the bottom line is **We are the Government**.

We have no problem in spending millions of dollars on useless, or borderline useless projects through-out the City, however when it comes to something as simple as a good clean supervised, washroom facility in the downtown area, we cant seem to pull it off.

Some people were able to get one of the local (Shut down) schools for AMHI, and it seems that this is working well. Perhaps we could get another School and renovate it and set it up as a place for the Homeless. This would have to be supervised of course.

We all know that if this was tried, the first thing you would hear is **Not in my neibourhood**

In any event the bottom line is. Talk is cheap, Action speaks louder that words.

Hopefully Deborah can take this issue a little further and maybe get something going. Who knows?
I commend anyone brave enough to even try to survive on the streets, even for one night. I too have taken this challenge, as a way to condition myself to what could have become a way of life.
My family of 4 has lived on 1 minimum wage full-time paycheque for over 5 years. Thank God I am fortunate enought to have family and friends who would help me when I needed them. Without their support I would have been one of the people who go from "at risk" to homeless because of 1 paycheque.
I realized recently that there was not much difference between my asking friends and family for what I needed and the people on the street who were asking for my help. I even felt ashamed that I wasn't in a position to give them the help they wanted.
My family is in a better position now, and I look forward to helping those needy people, making donations to food banks and shelters.
Life changes so fast, I may be back here again, and I want to make sure there's support ready if I need it.
Thanks Ben and Elaine for clarifying that you're complicit in the political exploitation of the homeless.

Maybe next time we can have a politician go into prison and give us a sound bite on, "Let's Get Tough on Crime". It's comforting to know that you'll be here to provide a forum... trust you increase your editorials leading up to elections. LOL

Once again... nice to know the collective "we" are choosing to heat furniture rather than feed and shelter the homeless. If I'm wrong in this interpretation of Munoz' sound bite, please feel free to clarify how else one could possibly ingterpret it ... other than Munoz being a dipsy idiot i.e. of the Valley Girl genre. Alternatively, I have to believe she's simply another political pariah.

Choices:
1.) stupid
2.) malicious
"political exploitation of the homeless" that adds some clarity to what you are so angry about QuasiMe.