Clear Full Forecast

Moose Destruction Disappointing: One Man's Opinion

By Ben Meisner

Monday, March 05, 2007 03:45 AM

 
I was out of the city when it was decided  a cow moose that had trampled a dog and injured a woman  had to be destroyed.

It may now be a bit late to comment, but never the less, I found some fault with the manner in which the spin on the killing took place.

The game wardens had to put the animal down, (kill it). The female moose was loaded with ticks they say.  If that is a reason to kill a moose then we will have few moose left in this region. Somehow suggesting that the young calves did not have any ticks, is also more than a bit of a stretch. Did they check them or is it more appropriate just to mention the old cow, because we had to get rid of her?

Now as for the reason to get rid of the moose. we have in this city, lots of moose that live in close proximity to our homes. The moose have been there since this city was established. They should have the same rights as the rest of us to be able to move freely about. The cow moose in question may have become agitated when time after time her calves have been chased by dogs that are not on leashes and their owners think its alright for the dogs to chase these animals around.

This cow was a good mother doing what good moose mothers do, defending her young.

Over the years that I have lived in Prince George, I have seen all sorts of situations where deer have been run to their deaths by dogs that have been let out at night to get some exercise.  The owners of the dogs have no regard to where the canines are going, or what they are doing.

Because of where she choose to raise her young , this particular moose was faced with this problem every year.  From the time her young were born , bears, dogs and indeed humans, invaded her space. Now should that moose have some rights?  Of course she should.

One of the things that we love to show people from out of town is the wildlife that exists around us. Moose don’t eat meat; they don’t go out of their way to attack people unless they have been continuously provoked.

When it is a grizzly bear attack, we reason that the bear was just protecting its territory but in the question of the moose it must be killed because it posed a danger.  It jus doesn’t add up.

I’m Meisner and that’s one man’s opinion   


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

It was not right that mother moose had to die.
We infringe on their territory more and more, and feel justified in doing so.
I know out the North Nechako the residents allow their large dogs to run free-and it is accepted by the residents. The smaller pets are confined as perhaps a fear of foxes and cougars brings a sense of danger for the owners of the small pets. The others just do not care. And yes, the deer and moose roam the area, even taking rest periods in yards in which they have nothing to fear.
The game warden was in error by destroying that animal. Perhaps he just wanted to feel the thrill of a kill.
Also the residents in the area, which use the property to walk their animals, should have enough brains to keep their pets under control.
The lady placed her own pet at risk. It died, as did another animal, both needlessly.
Stupidity, all the way around the board.
Thanks Ben -
This could be argued until hell freezes over....
Yeah it's a sad story. Poor dog thought it had to protect its owner...being loyal i'm sure. Sorry moose and dog went down and sorry the lady had to be faced with that situation. Um, yeah the wildlife for sure needs more respect afterall we share the same home. If we didnt get so much snow here i'd have nothing to complain about in that way but one of the reasons I love living in this area is how close we are to certain wildlife :) The moose should've been treated and transferred..can't be that hard. Harder things in this world have been done.
The local Conservation officers cover a vast region rife with poachers and general idiots, armed and wandering around the bush.They do their job well and to suggest that this particular moose was put down for the "Thrill of the kill" is a ridiculous statement.
Actually it doesnt matter if it is a bear or a moose. While the 'spin' might have been off base, the fact is that animals who attack humans are put down. While one can lament the fate of the moose for just doing her job, the CO had to do his. It is a mistake to allow animals which have attacked humans to exist near human habitation. If we were to let the moose live and maybe put up a few signs with 'danger! protactive moose' on them we would be asking for some trouble. I would not want to answer to someones greaving relatives that the life of a moose, with or without ticks was more important than public safety.
As for capture and removal of the animal, what makes this moose so special? Considering we hunt them, including cow and calf seaons i see no logic in spending a whole lot of time and money on this one just so someone can pop it in the proper season. We do share the province with wildlife, we dont share our residential areas with them. Its nice to have wildlife in your back yard. I know this as i own a farm. However, if said wildlife pose a threat to human beings then they need to be removed.
Oh, there you go again caranmacil, making sense (frown). You are right, a wild animal that attacks a human cannot be left to live with or close by the humans. I am still on the side of wildlife tho, because mostly, we have encroached on them. Moose are generally a pretty docile animal (except when rutting and protecting their young), so to have to put one down because it was reacting to Mother Nature, or an annoying barking dog (again), that makes me very sad. Prevention by way of a little education will be the best medicine for future safety of dogs, walkers, and mamma mooses...
So what happens to the calves now?

This is an honest question as I am uncertain as to how they will make out.
I understand that the calfs are in their second year and should be able to take care of themselves.
What will happen to the calves? Well, if I am not mistaken, they eventually will be shot dead after they get all growed up.. And be put to good use from someone hopefully. Hope they don't get shot at night. The circle of life. The Lion King. Seen that movie? As with little moose when they grow up, life goes on.
Yeah, caranmacil, and the human and dog were in the wild animals territory.
Doesn't count, does it?
Too bad we cannot do the same with humans who impose a threat.
If we share the area with wildlife-then how about showing them a little consideration?
Not in your world I don't suppose.
I think the first thing that could have been done was they could have put up warning signs when the first complaint was made 3 weeks prior to the animal being shot. That is where the fault lies with the conservation officer.

On a side note check out the way this dog fights off a raging bull to protect a man. Some dogs surely have more courage than they need for their own good. Fascinating stuff...

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f1e4b_4607
I think the CO made a right choice, No hard feelings but thank god it was a dog not someone small child which would be on anybodys mind if they did not kill the moose if it was still roaming around the area. Surely any time later it could be a small kid.
Breaking News:

Charging moose brings down helicopter in Alaska

http://edition.cnn.com/2007/US/03/05/moose.v.helo.ap/index.html