Clear Full Forecast

Phase Two of Air Quality Management Plan Offers LIttle

By 250 News

Monday, March 05, 2007 09:31 PM

It is supposed to be the  "bridge" betweeen the  first phase and the third phase of the Air Quality  Improvement Management Plan that was initially developed in 1998 for Prince George, and updated in 2004.  The  presentation of "Phase Two"  to Prince George City Council offers little in the way of new information or recommendations.

Of the 30 recommendations listed in the  report,  about  1/3  can be  considered "new" as  most  were listed as completed or ongoing in the progress report presented to Prince George City Council in October of 2004.

In short,  the recommendations have been re-cycled with the following exceptions:

#20:  The City ban  recreational fires on all properties in the City of Prince George.

This is not a  "ban  the weiner roast during an air quality advisory " recommendation, it is a call for the banning of  ALL recreational burning in  the City of Prince George.  "That was a bit of a hot issue during the phase one" says Committee Chair Rich Gerrard. He knows this is going to be a hot issue again but says City Staff  have indicated it is a problem "The problem they've had is abuse of it.  Somebody starts up a fire,  that is said to be a  backyard recreational  weinie roast, and the next thing they're finding is that people are throwing yard waste, garden debris,  wet leaves etcetera into them (the fire) and  they are getting complaints so it isn't working out real well from their perspective."

#10: Air quality considerations be incorporated into the P.G. Official Community Plan

#11: request  local government to designate land as needed for heavy industry so as to direct  future air pollutant sources to areas out of the airshed

#12: Conduct an airshed boundary  study to assist with determining air quality effects from open  burning and other air pollution sources within and aoutside the City of P.G.

#22 Ministry of Environment and the Regional District develop strategies to reduce open  burning of Mountain Pine Beetle and land clearing debris in areas surrounding the City.

#26. The City of Prince George complete all Milestones of the Partners for Climate Protection Program

#27  The Regional District continues to advance its Landfill Gas Managment Plan to pursue beneficial use options of landfill gas

and three other recommendations that have to do with monitoring and research funding. 

Ministry of Environment's David Sutherland says  the studies are critical to  identify the sources contributing to the problems today, and  to make plans for the future and the next  phase.

Councilor Don Zurowski says the  plan  doesn’t address restrictions to current license holders. Air Quality  Implementation  Committee Chair Rich Gerrard says there has  been a great deal of discussion with the City on how  development can be promoted  but without saying emissions must be zero.

One of the most serious concerns  over this past year  came through the  asphalt emissions. Gerard told Council  the Ministry of the Environment  is looking at some short term changes to asphalt regulations and a broader  change  to the regulations in the longer term. 

The President of PACHA (People'sAction Committee for Healthy Air)  sat through the presentation, and while Betty Bekkering says she supports the recommendations she said she was disappointed  in Council's actions "They received the report, but that doesn't mean they have agreed to adopt any of the recommendations." says Bekkering,  "so as far as I can see, it is status quo."


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Let me see now if i have this right. First the cause of polution was people heating their homes with wood. Then along came road dust. Then something or another from the northeast sector. Now it appears my grandkids weinee roasts are to blame. I guess we don't have any poluting industry in this part of the country. More power to PACHA. Let's keep the pressure on as it appears the mayor's committee is out to spin the causes and do nothing to solve the problem.
sweet f**k all is going to happen
The planning committee reports to no one. It is not assessed for competency by an independent external agency.

With SFM (sustainable forest management) certification systems for instance, the plans are audited every year by an external auditor for compliance with objectives set.

Here is Canfor's page for data applicable to forest management standards on the ground, all available for public view for whoever wishes to determine for themselves what is going on.

http://www.canfor.com/sustainability/certification/csa.asp

When the Air shed committee gets a bit closer to that standard of operating (which could take light years at the present rate) then we can talk. In the meantime, they are simply not applying anywhere near best practices. The interests are just not there to move forward. Tonights evetn just shows it once more.

Where is PACHA in all this. They have had someone on the committee for 3 or 4 meetings by now. Seems the tongues of all members are cut as a prerequisite to sit at the table.
"#11: request local government to designate land as needed for heavy industry so as to direct future air pollutant sources to areas out of the airshed"

Every time I bring this up to anyone on Council they swear it is done. My information tells me it isn't. This confirms that I am right once more, or that the left hand does not know what the right hand is doing.
"#27 The Regional District continues to advance its Landfill Gas Managment Plan to pursue beneficial use options of landfill gas"

It seems to me that the province is just about to step into this and make it a requirement to capture the methane gas.
"develop strategies to reduce open burning of Mountain Pine Beetle"

Reduce????? ... unbelievable!!!!!

Ban!!!!!!

Instead of returning the gases immediately as GHG to the atmosphere and ticking off a few rural dwellers, chip it and put it down on the forest floor where it belongs. That results in slow release of GHG such as natural systems typically do plus retaining nutrients for the soil.
"#10: Air quality considerations be incorporated into the P.G. Official Community Plan"

Well, hello. I would have assumed that this would have been a prerequisite in any plan designed for people, or perhaps they are considered a renewable resource.
Scary. I think I'll go in the backyard and light up a nice warm dead pine fire and spend the evening contemplating what my kids will not have.
Yama, can I join you................
I am no expert on the PG air shed but environmentally, chipping and spreading pine waste makes no environmental sense. Spreading out the release of greenhouse gases over several years does not reduce the overall amount released. Further, the energy used in chipping and spreading the stuff will cause more greenhouse gas emissions than will be saved by not burning.
When i drive inot town i am never saying to myself: hmm whats that smell... its kind of hard to breathe....someone must be having a weinie roast! It smells like pulp mill to me.
It will be a cold day in hell before I stop having family wiener roasts in my back yard. Go pick on the big boys and leave the good residence of PG alone.
"Spreading out the release of greenhouse gases over several years does not reduce the overall amount released"

Not all forest floor biological debris off gasses into the air. Otherwise we would not have peat, coal, oil, natural gas, etc.
"Posted by: Mcfly on March 6 2007 7:48 AM
Yama, can I join you................"

Anytime. Bring Gofaster, he can watch the fire if we have to run after some damn thief. HeeHee!
Phase One...inhale
Phase Two....exhale.
Simple, eh?