CN and Safety: City Resident Wonders
By 250 Views
Is there a public safety issue in the City of Prince George regarding the CN’s close proximity to citizens?
The history of the CN activities in the City goes back to the early 1900’s. The CN following the river was a natural development. There was no particular disruption to the quiet lives of residents along the CN path in the years that followed. The only disruption was that of "Lonsesome Charlie" who used to whistle at the level crossing off first Avenue and Carney Street. Lonsesome Charlie had to cease his activities when residents complained and quiet ruled again.
Life changed for residents when the Cameron Street Overpass was built. Although there was opposition Council passed the approval of the overpass by one vote, so there was a divided council. Since that point in time there has not been quiet for residential areas adjoining CN.
The yards were extended to come up under the Nechako Subdivision and two additional tacks were installed between the old Nechako Bridge and the John Hart bridge. The years that followed were noisy and dirty for residents as the CN’s shunting yards, by Federal law, are allowed to operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week. (You will notice aigns on Highways approaching bridges for trucks not to apply their brakes, there are no such regulations for the CN.)
Now we come to the issue of safety and the leave the noise problems to those unfortunate who are affected by the noise and dirt. Harzardous goods are now passing through the City and this affects all the City not just those with close proximity to the tracks.
The other day I witnessed one train right under my house (past the Cameron Street Overpass, by the water pumping station) with its’ engine idling. I had heard them during the night on many occasions but hadn’t observed them. I wondered why they were just sitting there when boom along comes a second train from the West (Prince Rupert) which passes the idling train. The idling train then departed for Prince Rupert.
Many will recall the Blue River disaster when a switch wasn’t thrown. The possibility is that these two trains could have collided due to error and PrinceGeorge would have had a tragedy.
Desite many appeals to City Council and to CN the danger just increases with the establishment of the inland port in the yards.
Am I the only that cares? By the silence I would guress that and yet there may be many who care but don’t know what to do about it. We are no longer talking about the sweet smell of money we are talking about lives.
I successfully ran for Council in 1985 opposing the Cameron Street overpass
-Phyllis Parker
Editor’s note:
The Railway Safety Act Review includes a public consultation meeting to be held in Prince George on May 18th at the Coast Inn of the North. The deadline for written submissions was the 4th of May.
Previous Story - Next Story
Return to Home
Dangerous Goods are handled by Rail for a number of reason IE: Bulk Loading, Cost, and of course to keep these commoditys off our highways. These trains travel through Jasper, Hinton, Kamloops, Vanderhoof, Burns Lake, Houston, Smithers, Terrace, and Prince Rupert on a daily basis, so the problem is not restricted to Prince George.
To have the Railway avoid all the Cities because of Dangerous Goods would mean a major rebuild of the Railway at a cost of Hundreds of Millions of Dollars, and this will never happen.
Prince George is a major producer of Dangerous Goods, ie;
Hydrogen Peroxide (FMC) Corp
Sulphuric Acid (Marselex)
Sulphur Dioxide ((Marselex)
Sodium Chlorate (Chemtrade)
Gasoline & Diesel (Husky Refinery)
These chemicals have been handled in, out, and through Prince George for years by Truck and Rail. Because of location of the Plants and the Destinations of the Dangerous Goods it is highly unlikely that a system could be put in place where no area of the City would be impacted by the Transportation of these commodities.
Last but not least one must remember that People chose to locate their residential area next to the Railway Tracks for what ever reason. To locate by the Rail Track and then some years later expect the Railway to move because it is dangerous is a bit of a stretch.
The best people can do is to ensure that the Railways abide by all the Safety Rules that are already in place. If they do this then we shouldnt have a problem, however with downsizing, and the need to always improve the bottom line, quite often safety and maintenance take a back seat. That is when problem can arise.