Clear Full Forecast

Ombudsman Announces Review of Resource Road Safety

By 250 News

Friday, May 25, 2007 04:00 AM

Resource Roads  will be the focus of the second comprehensive review to be conducted by BC’s Forest Safety Ombudsman, Roger Harris.

Harris will look at how to improve their function and safety for people in the industry and the general public who use them.

Resource roads were the source of 41 different requests for assistance in Harris’s  first year  as Ombudsman, making it the number one issue.

Some of the  problems raised are:

  • road maintenance,
  • cycle times,
  • hours of work,
  • road construction,
  • funding,
  • jurisdictional responsibility and
  • financial responsibility. 

Resource roads make up  the majority of  transportation lines in the province.   There are  47,000 kilometres of public roads in B.C.,  while resources roads  account for  more than 650 thousand  kilometres, and they are growing.

Problem is, the resopurce roads aren't just for resources anymore.   "The roads were built for an entirely different clientelle" says Harris, "Now they are being used  not only for forestry, but  oil and gas, mining,  public recreation, and eco tourism and the volume of traffic on these roads is increasing."

The  Forest Safety Ombudsman told Opinion250 that even if the work in the woods  declines because of  a downturn in the market, the activity on the roads will continue to increase  "Even without forestry, it is an issue for everybody, and its going to be more of an issue."

Harris says the  matter is complex,   "I have learned that by the time an issue  reaches my office,  it  won't be an easy one to resolve, to start off with, there are jurisdictional issues, who is responsible for maintenance, what role does the Ministry play, or the RCMP? These are all questions that need to be answered." 

Harris says  the problem is familiar."It is not unlike the  first report  we did where  we found that once you left the cut block, no one was really in charge until  you hit the highway. There is no one with an overiding  responsibility."

The problem may be  that  with  responsibility  comes liability  "That is a good question,  and it is possible  liability  will be one of the recommendations in the final report."

In 2005, 11 logging truck drivers died on the job which accounted for 26 per cent of the total fatalities in the forest sector that year.  In 2006, there were fewer truck driver fatalities, but the deaths accounted for 42 per cent, or five of the 12, total forest sector fatalities that year.  So far in 2007, no logging truck drivers have died but 12 have been injured, some seriously.

That's not to say there hasn't been a great deal of work  done to reduce  injuries and fatalities.  Harris acknowledges the Forestry TruckSafe program  has made  significant progress: 

  •  a cost-sharing formula for resource road maintenance has been developed, 
  • adopted vehicle identification plates for trucks,
  • established regular communication regarding hazards and
  • managed technical development work on steep-slope hauling standards.
  • Council staff also met with more than 6,000 truckers and owners throughout the province to discuss safety initiatives and challenges. 

Still, Harris says there needs to be more “We continue to see serious injuries and fatalities in trucking and truck-related incidents.  It’s time to figure out what’s going on and do something about it.”

Harris  expects to complete his review by the end of this year, and the final report will likely be released early  in the new year.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

There is a lot of damage done to active and abandoned forestry road in the spring by 4x4 use. Some people actually build trucks to go mud bogging at that time of year, and the damage they do lasts until the road is regraded. If the road is not regraded the road gets worse every year until it is impassible by everyone.

So far the response has been attempts to ban snowmobile use! HeeHee! No kidding, some people have no clue what goes on in the bush.

The drive to organize and delegate responsibility for bush roads comes from people like the Sierra Group of enviro types. With no one to lobby for a perfect world people pretty much enjoy outdoor recreation however they want. Snowmobiles have been a favorite target of late and the outdoor foot traffic wants the sleds to stay on the trails around town and out of the backcountry.

Therefore building another social control ministry is an important first step in getting large segments of the population back to drinking beer on the couch in front of the TV. Leaving town for a day of bush exploring is a pleasure that only a privileged few know how to enjoy properly. If you need a sled or quad to ride or you can walk very far any more, well, you will just have to stay home from now on.

Notice that it is not just "Tourism" but "Eco Tourism"!

I do have an issue with riding quads as such, but they are destroying a lot of trails. A number of the undeveloped trails inside the city limits have deep ruts dug into them making it difficult to walk and almost impossible to ride a mountain bike. These quads usually arrive by truck or trailer so why not go out of town and leave the close in trails to walkers and bike riders. Anyhow there is a law against riding quads inside the city limits, but bylaws are just words on scrap paper.

Go to the end of Domano on a sunday and count the number of quads. I am looking for a soution not a ban, but the trails are for every one, not just one group.
“There are 47,000 kilometres of public roads in B.C., while resources roads account for more than 650 thousand kilometers”

This statement mixes the characteristic of ownership of roads with use of roads. There can be private resource roads, such as those used to access remote mines, for instance, which are often gated or have otherwise controlled access. Most so called “resource roads” in BC are actually Forest Service Roads. Forest Service Roads are public roads with unrestricted access. They are under the jurisdiction of the province via the MoF and those who carry out enforcement under the Motor Vehicle Act (MVA).

The problem is that no one wants to be the enforcer. The RCMP simply does not have the manpower to do so. The MoF, to the best of my knowledge, does not have anyone with peace officer status who can enforce the MVA, so they are powerless and likely want to stay that way.

The law governing the “rules of the road” on Forest Services Roads comes in part from the Forest Range and Practices Act. It sets out the Forest Service Road Use Regulation which states in section 2: “Provisions of Motor Vehicle Act applicable to forest service roads - The following provisions of the Motor Vehicle Act apply to all forest service roads as if a forest service road were a highway:”

It then cites about 35 sections of the MVA which apply and states that officers of the peace can enforce those sections. http://www.qp.gov.bc.ca/statreg/reg/F/ForRangPrac/70_2004.htm

So, in the final analysis it is the Government of BC that has the authority and the responsibility to ensure that the paved highways as well as the vast network of public “resource” roads are properly designed to a common and safe standard, that users are properly educated in how to use the roads safely, possibly by adding a different classification to a drivers license for all those using such roads, and putting the capacity in place to enforce the MVA regulations which apply to Forest Service Roads and other public resource roads.

The real question is, why has this situation been allowed to deteriorate to this point? Why is an industry safety association funded by the WCB through its industry assessments becoming responsible for this?