Clear Full Forecast

PG Green Company Building McBride Research Plant

By Michelle Cyr-Whiting

Saturday, June 23, 2007 04:10 AM

Alterna Energy Inc’s Leonard Legault (left) and Phil Marsh (right)

A Prince George-based company is poised to burst onto the North American scene of the emerging green energy production industry...

Alterna Energy Inc. was founded, according to its information pamphlet, to "harness the opportunities in the green energy sector, particularly those created by the excess of wood fibre biomass in central British Columbia created by the mountain pine beetle epidemic."

While his motto is "under-promise, over-deliver", President & CEO, Leonard Legault, says he’s quietly confident a testing facility already under construction in McBride, will give the company the data it needs to begin breaking ground on its first North American plant, possibly in Prince George, by the end of the year.  (Alterna already has a plant in South Africa)

Chief Technology Officer, Phil Marsh, says Alterna’s "Enviro Carbonizer" takes bio-mass - like wood waste, solid sewage waste and garbage - and, through carbonization, produces a charcoal dust.  Marsh says it’s highly efficient when compared to other green processes like ethanol, which takes 5-litres of ethanol in the processing of wood waste to produce 6-litres ethanol as the end product.

And the process has enormous implications for the northern half of the province - with the abundance of beetle kill wood on the one hand, and the need by industries like mining to supply power to remote areas, well off Hydro’s grid.  "Huge implications that we can look at by, first of all, being an independent power producer operating on any kind of carbonaceous material or bio-mass in the location," says Marsh.  He points out Alterna’s enviro carbonizers are modular and transportable and can be doubled or tripled, depending on the power needs.

Alterna’s President says that versatility is also a key to providing energy security, particularly in our region where the amount of available bug kill wood may vary at any given time.  "If there’s a situation where we either can’t attain biomass for some period, or the demand (for energy) jumps all of a sudden tommorow, now we’re one of the few systems, or maybe the only system that can mitigate that," says Legault.  "Because as soon as we create this carbon, it’s now basically an inert piece of charcoal, if you like.  It can sit there in a storage tank for years."

Legault and Marsh met with Energy, Mines, and Petroleum Resources Minister Richard Neufeld when he was in the city on Wednesday.  Legault says their presentation was well-received.  "There’s going to be some calls (Request for Proposals) coming up based on remote power and we’re keen on those."

In the meantime, Alterna will begin emmissions testings at its research plant in McBride starting next month.  "We’re pretty confident there’s not going to be any issues," says Legault.  "But it has yet to be proven by a third party."

Marsh says wood will be the focus of testing right now.  "We have carbonized many different materials on a test basis in South Africa, but in Canada, now, we have to determine which ones meet emissions criteria."  The process could spell relief for municipalities struggling to deal the amount of solid waste going into landfills.

The testing is expected to be complete by late summer or early fall, with Alterna planning to make an announcement on a plant at that time.  Legault, a long-time resident of Prince George, admits a number of communities in the Lower Mainland have been trying to woo Alterna, but says the company is "more focused on issues for the North right now."


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Finally we have someone who appears to be doing it right - extracting energy from wood and other waste and, instead of putting the carbon up in the air as carbon dioxide, sequestering a portion of the carbon to be stored or used in other processes where it can, in some cases, stay sequestered.

And they are doing it in small components which could be installed close to the source of the feedstock to remove the emissions otherwise resulting from transporting the feedstock.

On top of that, they are testing the system and having third parties evaluate it to see whether their theory pans out as planned.

A green company in PG. Who would have thought, eh?

;-)
The article is not clear as to the process. During carbonisation, is there energy produced or consumed? Are there other chemicals produced during the process, if not, what happens to the other components of the wood? The resulting carbon mass, is it then burned to run generators? If so, what is the "green" component since carbon dioxide will be the result? Obviously, there is some advantage to burning relatively pure carbon compared to impure mixtures of carbon and other stuff in coal, but carbon dioxide is still the end result.
The process is an old one. Following the second world war, much of the technology application ended up in South Africa.

The process essentially is referred to as incomplete combustion in an oxygen poor environment reducing the combining of carbon with oxygen.

The carbon one ends up with is pure, not the mixture one gets in coal deposits. Thus it can be used for many purposes. Pharmaceuticals is one use. Carbon filtration systems is another. Steel production, where it gets sequestered in the steel (carbon steel) is another. Then there is the choice of simply sequestering (storing) the carbon to get it out of the system. Most of those uses are actually listed in the article.

Carbon sequestering is a process being worked on in some parts of the world, mainly Australia at the moment I think. The idea is to pull the carbon out of the air and creating carbon to store. This process stops the CO2 which goes up in smoke everytime someone uses pellets to heat their home or create electricity, captures the heat energy to create steam/electricity, but does not release all of the carbon into the air, instead creating carbon.
her is a paper on the manufacturing and use of chracoal in Africa.

http://rael.berkeley.edu/files/2005/Kammen-Lew-Charcoal-2005.pdf

As you say, the trick is to not put it to use in the process of using it to heat, cook, etc. As long as the process extracts some of the energy and sequesteres the carbon remaining rather than burning it in another proces which releases it into the air as CO2, then this works.

I would want to see some assurance of that before endorsing this process.
It is really nice to see Leonard`s smiling face. A home grown product who has evolved from the original family business. His father would be proud of him, I know I am.
It is good to see all of these ideas coming forward in these "green times", especially when it relates to our pine beetle problem. I too would like to see some more facts on this process before I can endorse it.

I am glad to see the concern currently expressed by Canadians and Canadian politicians about environmental issues. What puzzles me though, is why in these times of "being green is the thing to do",
why is there so much outrage when the price of gasoline goes up. I would think the best policy to reduce greenhouse gases is to impose a tax on the usage of all fossil fuels. This would encourage energy conservation
and the creation of "greener" alternative energy sources. It seems to me that in Canada when it comes to looking out for the environment we are talking the talk, but are not walking the walk.
I wish these guys well and hope that it works out for them. Definitely have their intent in the right place. Hope it all comes together.