Clear Full Forecast

Quality of Life Survey Complete

By 250 News

Monday, June 25, 2007 08:30 PM

The  latest Quality of Life Survey  for Prince George has been  completed and the  results suggest residents of Prince George are more satisfied today than they were two years ago when the last survey was conducted. 

Two thousand surveys were sent out to homes in Prince George, and more than 400 were returned. That would represent about  one half of one percent of the over all population, but Mayor Colin Kinsley says the return rate (20%) is considered  high. 

The results are considered accurate + or - 5 % points, 19 out of 20 times.

There were higher levels of satisfaction with their jobs, financial security, recreational activities and self esteem.

  • The average age of the people who returned the survey was 52, (alittleolder than previous surveys which had an average of  44 years.)
  • The majority, (65.4%) were married.    
  • 51.2% were employed full time,  
  • 8.0% employed part time, and
  • 23.3 % retired.
  • 84% support efforts with the Regional District to put future major industrial operations outside of the City’s Airshed.
  • 65% believe industrial development in the city is having an unfavourable impact on the quality of life in residential neighbourhoods

When it comes to housing, the preferred form of housing is a single detached family home (96%)

88% were satisfied with their current housing, and most (65%) don’t expect to be pressed for housing in the next five years.

The two most significant housing related issues in Prince George were identified as the supply of housing for the elderly (28%) and the quality of housing for the elderly (14%)

When comparing satisfaction with City  Services over the past   four years, the highest satisfaction  ratings ( somewhat or very satisfied) were given to  Fire prevention, the Civic Centre and library services.

Here is how some of the services fared (all percentages include somewhat and very satisfied):

Service
2003  %
2004  %
2007  %
Fire Protection
90.2
96.4
97.2
Civic Centre
88.8
98.8
98.5
Arenas/multiplex
88.9
95.2
96.2
Garbage Collection
89.8
90.5
96.2
Police Protection
85.2
77.7
91.8
Snow Control
78
70.7
84.8
Road and Street Maintenance
33.5
34.3
54.

    

According to the survey, the top concerns as outlined by the survey are:

Concern

% Who Identified

it As a Concern

Environment

   74.8

Housing Affordability

   67.2

Broadening Economic Base

            61.3        

Job Creation

              55.7                           

Industrial Growth and Development

              55.4

Urban Design : (having attractive new buildings in the community

              52.7

Although there were clear indications that  affordable housing for seniors is a concern, Councilor Deborah Munoz says she looks at this survey as an opportunity to make connections between  economic and social proactices, in particular  affordable housing for all citizens, and  she certainly will pay even more  attention to matters as they relate to environmental issues.

Councilor Don Zurowski wonders if the changing in the time of the year for the survey has anything to do with the  answers that may have come on issues like potholes.  He suggested that If the survey is done in the spring (as it was this year) people may be more aware of pothole issues, and not so concerned with issues of snow removal.

The full report  can be accessed  on the City of Prince George's "Public Consultation " page on the City's website.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

The �environment� actually seems to refer primarily to air quality.

66% thought that industrial development is having an unfavourable impact on the quality of life of the city, with 88% of those naming air emissions as the cause.

That means 58% of respondents thought that air emissions have an unfavourable impact on the quality of life in PG. That has been high on the list for a number of surveys. So what is being done about it? Very little! Stop your backyard burning.

Wish it would be that simple, eh?

What is this about the potholes?

�Councilor Don Zurowski wonders if the changing in the time of the year for the survey has anything to do with the answers that may have come on issues like potholes. He suggested that If the survey is done in the spring (as it was this year) people may be more aware of pothole issues, and not so concerned with issues of snow removal.�

I am not sure where he gets that from.

Here is what the report says:
� In 2003 - 33.5% were satisfied with road and street maintenance
� In 2005 � 34.3% were satisfied.
� In 2007 � 54% were satisfied.
Snow control for the same three years � 78.0% satisfaction; 70.7% satisfaction; 84.8% satisfaction

In fact, the jump in road maintenance satisfaction is phenomenal compared to others.

Interestingly all jumped to a greater satisfaction rating. On top of that, more than ever before want to pay more taxes if they get better service. Seems to be the opposite of the opinions on this site.
"What is this about the potholes?" I also would like to know. There are vicious cracks and huge potholes all over the place. Perhaps people have just simply lowered their standards after years of complaining?
Precisely diplomat. This is not just a spring thing.

As I recall, Council was told that the department cannot keep up the work of repairing all the potholes by the time winter rolls around and as part of the �service enhancement� (how about service delivery at a maintenance level, not to speak about an enhancement which would see the potholes fixed within the first 4 to 6 weeks following cessation of frequent freeze-thaw cycles) they were requesting a third crew which, as I recall, they did not receive. So, how on earth could they have finished fixing all the holes by mid June when they still have about 3 to 4 months to go to finish the year and they will likely not have fixed all the holes?

I am trying to figure out why the rate of satisfaction went up so high. Perhaps they saw that there was more money available for repaving. Hopefully the overall rate of satisfaction did not increase to the extent it did because a different measurement technique or cut-off was used.
Well c'mon folks... you don't actually believe the numbers in this "survey"... do you ???

This is another one of those "feel good" exercises that serves to distract the focus on getting things done.

Sort of like asking kids if they like ice cream... then announcing the startling approval ratings for ice cream !!!

Blessings