The Written Word: Rafe Mair August 4
By Rafe Mair
We’re told that this is the “way of life” for those who delight in the annual massacre. The government likes to call it a “cull” which is what they prefer to call an outright slaughter. But it goes further. News people and others aren’t allowed to get near enough to this murderous scene to take pictures. Some, including the redoubtable Paul Watson, have gone to jail for the heinous offence of aiming a camera at bludgeoning sealers. I wonder why this law is there and is enforced? Could it be that the sealers, Loyola Hearn and the government are ashamed at what’s happening and don’t want the public to see? Baby seals for rich European ladies’ backs – what a noble enterprise that is! It does raise the entire question as to what, if any, animals should be used for what purposes – something I struggled with for years until 3 years ago I stopped fishing because I saw I was tormenting animals. I long ago gave up veal and I now pass on lamb as well. I haven’t stopped eating shellfish wearing leather shoes. To that extent I suppose I’m a hypocrite. But at least I’m a hypocrite that’s ashamed as hell at the sight of killing baby seals so that fashionable ladies can be properly attired at the opera. I see that Loyola Hearn, our east coast Minister of Fisheries, is talking to Belgium about their banning of baby seal pelts. What kind of people are we anyway? How can anyone support the slaughter, often in the cruelest of manners, of baby seals so that ladies can have soft fur coats?
Previous Story - Next Story
Return to Home
There has got to be a better way, cause it tastes so good that its a shame. Those are jobs I don't envy and like to think about. The ones that don't even do it for food you would have to question their sanity.
BTW Most vegans have cats and cats eat mostly meat bi-product foods, so how do they square that one. Do they cuddle up to cats made of dead animals or do they have selective application of the rule?