Clear Full Forecast

On the Boundaries Commission Report - Part 2

By Submitted Article

Friday, August 31, 2007 03:50 AM

        

Part 2 –  “The Super Ridings of the North”

By Peter Ewart and Dawn Hemingway

This is the second in a series about the Electoral Boundaries Commission report.  See "Part 1- Arbitrary Recommendations that disenfranchise the north"

It could be called the “mother of all ridings” in British Columbia.  From end to end, this vast riding encompasses some of the most rugged terrain and treacherous climactic conditions in the world.  And the Electoral Boundaries Commission of BC, which, in its wisdom, is proposing this gigantic “super riding” wants to call it the “Northeast” (even though part of it extends over to the extreme Northwest).

This expanded riding, which extends over the entire top of the province, as well as more than half way down one side, will start 150 kilometers or so south of Tumbler Ridge in the Peace River country.  After barreling up to the Yukon border, it turns left and finally ends up at the extreme Northwest tip of the province bordering on Kluane National Park in the Yukon, a couple of hundred kilometers west of Atlin, BC. 

(Note: If you would like to look at a map of the riding go to the Electoral Boundaries Commission site at:  www.bc-ebc.ca  and click the icon titled “Proposed Boundaries.”)

The riding’s size – 274,000 km - is staggering.  Twice as big as the combined territory of New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island, and bigger than most countries in Europe including the United Kingdom, Romania and Greece.

How did this riding come about?  Well, it is the “brainchild” of the current Electoral Boundaries Commission and its decision to cut a riding from the Northern region of BC, thus requiring the expansion of the ridings that were left.  According to the EBC, this cut was necessary because the population had declined 19,000 in the entire Northern region (which works out to be a little more than a 2,000 person dip for each of the current 8 northern ridings).

If you include the roads South of Tumbler Ridge and the access roads into the far western upper tip of the province, the drive for any new Northeast MLA, much of which would be along the Alaska Highway, would probably be around 1800 kilometers. 

That’s quite a journey!  Just for comparison sake, if the riding started in Prince George, it would extend all the way down to Eureka, California.  Or even better yet (for delicious irony), if it started in Premier Campbell’s Point Grey riding in Vancouver, it would stretch across BC, across all of Alberta, and finish up in Saskatchewan. 

This “Northeast” riding is the one the Commission has proposed if BC adopts the Single Transferable Vote system in the 2009 provincial referendum.  Just 2 MLAs would be expected to cover its vast territory.  But, interestingly enough, the size problem is even worse if the province votes to keep the existing Single Member Plurality system (SMP) - also known as “First Past the Post” - because the SMP riding is only marginally smaller than the STV one, yet there will be only one MLA.

Anyone who has driven from Dawson Creek way up to Atlin knows how grueling and potentially dangerous, such a trip is, especially in winter and especially having to cross the several high mountain ranges along the way.  Perhaps the only thing more nightmarish for the unlucky MLA who gets stuck with this riding will be to fly.  Ditching a small plane in a remote mountain pass in the middle of a blinding snowstorm would certainly be an interesting job shadowing experience for any prospective MLA.

In order to assemble this riding, the Commissioners had to add on a big chunk of the extreme northwest corner of the province, an area which includes that beautiful gem of a town, Atlin.

Now the Commission in its report makes a lot of statements about how it has striven, in its calculations, to keep “communities of interest” together in ridings.  Indeed, it points out that a previous commission made a mistake by including Mackenzie in a Peace River riding.  Mackenzie has a much closer “community of interest” connection to Prince George and area, being separated from the Peace Country by the Rocky Mountains.

So, the Commission concludes it won’t include Mackenzie with the Peace, because “the Peace is a distinct area” with its own history, geography, economy, etc. and to do so would be to impose “an artificial connection.” (p. 79). 

But what does the Commission do instead with the Peace River area?  It creates a “super riding” by “artificially connecting” the Atlin area of the province (which is currently in the Bulkley Valley – Stikine riding) with Peace River and calls this Frankenstein of a riding, “Northeast.”  This appears to directly contradict another part of the Commission’s Report where it says “there is little community interest between [Peace River] and population centers to the west”, e.g., Atlin (p. 77).

Atlin certainly is much farther away from the Peace country than Mackenzie.  Indeed, Mackenzie is only 277 kilometres from Dawson Creek and its even a shorter distance to Chetwynd.  But Atlin is 973 km away from the nearest town in the Peace Country, i.e., Fort Nelson, and you have to cross several mountain ranges, not just one.  According to the Commission, the reason why they included the Atlin area with the Peace was because they “believe the interests of the residents of Atlin would be better served” because of the better highway connection to Fort Nelson. 

None of the people Opinion250 contacted in Atlin said that they had heard about anyone in the area being consulted by the Boundaries Commission.  Indeed, George Holman, the president of the Atlin Board of Trade and the unofficial “mayor” of Atlin, thought the idea of connecting the area to the Peace country was “wrong” and that the Atlin area had  a closer connection to the settlements of the existing Bulkley Valley – Stikine riding (which is adjacent to the Alaska Panhandle).  Certainly, the history, geography and culture of Atlin are much different and distinct from that of the Peace country.

The Atlin area is also one of the traditional territories of the Tlingit people who have a similar culture to other north coast First Nations such as the Haida, Eyak and Tsmishian peoples.  This coastal culture is quite different from the First Nations of the much further inland Peace River country.  So why aren’t the Tlingit included in a riding with their coastal neighbours?  Surely there is a “community of interest” there that goes back thousands of years?  But the Commission does not answer that question.

This proposed Northeast riding is not even the biggest one of the 3 super ridings (Northeast, Northwest, and North Central) the Commission is proposing for the North if the people of BC vote to change the electoral system to STV.  That distinction lies with the proposed Northwest riding which covers a colossal 299,000 square kilometers of the Western part of the province (North Central, which includes Prince George, is about 130,000 square km). 

In any case, these 3 super ridings are an example of the contortions and acrobatics that the Commission has had to go through as a result of their decision to take away an MLA from the North.  If the Commission wanted to find a way to kill the northern support for STV, they have certainly found a way by patching together these super ridings.

If the Commission’s proposals go through, this will put supporters of electoral reform, such as the authors of this article, in a difficult situation.  On the one hand, many believe, the current SMP (First Past the Post) system needs to be discarded because it entrenches big party power at the expense of voters.  But, although STV has a lot of merits and does give more power to voters, how can it be supported it if it means we will end up with 3 huge, unwieldy “super ridings”?  In the 2009 referendum, we, as northerners, could face two bad choices.

If the political parties in the Provincial Legislature choose to adopt the Commission’s proposals, the only option might be for citizens to organize a boycott of the 2009 referendum, as well as a campaign to demand more MLAs for the region.  The northern and rural areas of this province have had enough.

Peter Ewart is a college instructor and Dawn Hemingway is a university professor.  Both live in Prince George and can be reached at: peter.ewart@shaw.ca


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Everyone knows Atlin should be governed from Whitehorse. 90 klicks to Jakes Corner on the Alaska highway and then another 70 or so to Whitehorse.
Just remember, the people on the Commission are all from the Lower Mainland. Atlin and Fort Nelson, even Prince George, are just dots on a map to them. I expect the MLA for this new region better have some frequent flyer miles, cuz they will need them.
The current MLA for part of this "proposed" riding is the Energy Minister, Richard Neufeld. I suppose he will have lots of time to think about greenhouse gases as he traverses cross this riding
Just remember, the people on the Commission are all from the Lower Mainland. Atlin and Fort Nelson, even Prince George, are just dots on a map to them. I expect the MLA for this new region better have some frequent flyer miles, cuz they will need them.
Yes its a large riding but how many people live in it? And thats what we pay our politicians for is to get out and meet their constituants. If distance is a problem then find a constituency that you can work with.

Hurray for the bounderies commission and here is the bright side maybe we will get rid of some of our lazy as--d politicians that dont bother with the voters as it is.

It will be interesting to see how many will turn up at the Mares rally on Sept 5 at the civic centre plaza. Please note who has the most interest in this rally. The Chamber of Commerce Downtown Business Association and City Council and what they are looking for is more politicians to garner more tax dollars for their use.

Cheers
"...to garner more tax dollars for their use."

Good luck to any and all! The much awaited airport runway extension is on hold once again because the promised money from the province is still in limbo!

And that with having 3 (three!) Liberal MLAs supposedly representing our interests?

Wow! I won't be at the rally because I might suffer a mental hernia!

Cheers!




I am almost 99.99% certain that if this Commissions recommendations go through then the only option left for Northern BC is to separate as its own province. It is the only way we in the north will be able to have a participatory democracy that is receptive to our northern issues.

We can not rely on the generosity of the Lower Mainland MLA's to support our issues.

I'd also like to say the two posters that advocate defeatism are losers from the get go and contribute nothing of substance to the debate.
"...and contribute nothing of substance to the debate."

In contrast to the posts full of substance that are regularly submitted by Chadermando, of course.

Perhaps you desire to have everyone submit posts that pass your own sublime standards?

How monotonous that would be!

There is a vast difference between defeatism and realism. There are not the same thing.

Cheers!

We can give Chandermando the job of getting the voters in the North to get off their butts and vote for a separate Northern Province. What a laugh. You will have a hard time getting them out of the Bingo Halls, Casinos, Movies, Hockey Games, etc; etc; etc;, to go and vote. Getting a separate Northern Province is a joke and will never happen.

As far as the super ridings go, this is a bunch of **hogwash** who cares how many square miles there is in a riding. This has nothing to do with representation. MLA's do not represent, trees, animals, fish, or iron ore concentrates, they represent people and therefore what you need to look at is the population of the riding. 19000 people then look at where they reside (citys, towns, and villages) and then if you wish you can translate this into the number of square miles they live on and you would come up with a pretty small number.

To try to equate the size of the riding in square miles is misleading.

Ask yourself this question. As the ridings now stand, how many times in a year would our present MLA'S visit these small communitys. Give us some examples as to how often they went to Atlin, or Ft Nelson, or any other remote spot. I doubt if they went more than once a year, if that. If you cannot give us the correct information on how they are represented now, then dont make vague references as to how difficult it will be for them to visit these places in the future. These towns are not going anywhere. They never have had any good representation, and probably never will.
The Northern Territories in Austrailia have 2 representatives for approx 209000 people most of which live in the populated areas. This territory covers 530,000 Square Miles, and the temperature gets up to 120 degrees farenheit.

By comparison we are well off here in the North. Im sure you can find other areas of the world that have a lot less representation than we do, and have a much worse life style, but heh" dont let that stop you from complaining.
While I guess you guys could all show up and make tha argument that the North only needs 1 MLA for the entire North so as to save money because our representation means nothing anyways. I'm sure it would get some attention.

Another thing I was thinking is that those that argue this is an effort to short circuit the benefits of BCSTV should keep in mind that although they are correct, it is also important to remember that even if BCSTV is allowed to work as envisioned by the CItizens Assembly in the Vancouver-Victoria-Okanogan majority then it will still have benefits to the rest of the rural province the political parties are trying to take the boots too. Democratically elected politicians in Vancouver will be a step in the right direction even if our democracy is stolen from us in rural BC. Its not a perfect world, but no reason to give up on the BCSTV just because the political parties have found a way to short circuit the process for the rural riding they want to continue to harvest.
IMHO, the only way to justify keeping the representation we have, is to establish that the northern areas of the Province are growing (or at least remaining stable) and not shrinking. The arguments about relating the level of representation to economic contributions are bunk. That works great when our area is booming, but what happens in 10 years when forestry has shrunk by significant levels, along with those economic contributions? Also, how exactly do we measure the economic contribution in an objective manner? Is is based on wages? Taxes paid? Locations of operations? Locations of head offices? Quite simply, I think it would be impossible to implement.

Representation will always be about the populous. The only way to ensure more representation is to GROW the region and attract more people to live here. That of course takes the development of cities that people want to live in and the creation of jobs. Those aren't easy things to do and in PG at least, we haven't shown that we can accomplish those goals. I think we need to fix our own backyard first before crying about how we're getting the shaft from someone else. I think every-time we do nothing about air pollution, sensible development, etc., we are essentially shafting ourselves of the opportunity to grow the City and EARN more representation.