Clear Full Forecast

Report From Parliament's Hill: October 19th

By Prince George - Peace River M.P. Jay Hill

Friday, October 19, 2007 03:43 AM

            

Canadian Democracy Deserves Better Opposition Than Mr. Dion

The impossible has happened.  Editorial columnists, political analysts, Conservatives, New Democrats, the Green Party, the Bloc Quebecois and yes, even the majority of Liberals, are finally united on an issue.  Stéphane Dion’s actions and behaviour in response to the Speech from the Throne are astoundingly hypocritical and depraved.

The unprincipled and erratic way Mr. Dion went about arriving at his response to our Conservative Government’s Throne Speech is a disservice to Canadian democracy, which deserves a strong and credible official opposition.

For almost a full day Mr. Dion would offer no opinion on the speech to either the Canadian public or his own Liberal caucus.  Then he spent over a half-hour in the House of Commons in a meandering, combative diatribe, declaring the speech an abysmal offensive agenda.  Plus, he moved a four-part amendment of non-confidence in the speech … BUT, he declared he would let it pass, thereby avoiding an election and his own certain political demise.

In contrast, as leader of the Official Opposition in 2005, Stephen Harper responded decisively and immediately after Paul Martin’s budget was delivered, saying that, on balance, it wasn’t bad enough to bring down the government and send Canadians to the polls for a second time in less than a year.

Mr. Dion has reinforced his hypocrisy and confounded his own party.  It’s incomprehensible that he so vehemently disagrees with our entire Throne Speech yet will still let it pass.

Regardless, it’s good news that taxpayers will not incur the cost of an unnecessary election.  Our Conservative Government is eager to move forward with the strong message and agenda contained within our Speech from the Throne. 

The Government’s core priorities in the coming months are:  strengthening Canada’s sovereignty and its place in the world; protecting our environment and the health of Canadians; steering our economy toward long-term prosperity; modernizing our federal and democratic institutions; and making our streets and communities safer.

We’ll push ahead with democratically-elected Senators, senate term limits and scrapping the long-gun registry.  We’ll stick to our environmental targets, which are among the most aggressive in the world.  We’ll continue to rapidly pay down our nation’s debt and cut taxes, including a further reduction to the GST.

We’ve already introduced a single Bill, C-2, comprised of six bills that the opposition-controlled committees or the unelected Liberal majority in the Senate blocked or gutted in the last session.  This includes mandatory prison time for serious gun crimes, bail reform, raising the age of consent to protect our children from sexual predators, cracking down on drug and alcohol impaired driving and tougher monitoring and consequences for high-risk and repeat offenders.

Furthermore, we will not allow Mr. Dion to prolong his own political life in allowing the Throne Speech to pass, only to turn around and once again block the changes Canadians are asking for.  Therefore, our justice legislation will be a question of confidence in our government.  If the opposition parties vote down this bill, they will bring down our government and prompt a general election.

As the Prime Minister stated earlier this month, “It’s time for the opposition parties to fish or cut bait”.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Go sit on your little yes man chair behind mr harper...and do whatever it is you do?
Really getting tired of your holier than thou attitude
Actually time for Harper to bring our troops home, NOW!
Hill:" The unprincipled and erratic way Mr. Dion...a disservice to Canadian democracy, which deserves a strong and credible official opposition."

He doesn't want us to remember the time when the whole Conservative Party Caucus could meet on the front seat of a pickup truck!

That indeed was one of the most *credible* and *strong* opposition Canada ever had the displeasure of enjoying!

Mr. Dion made a very smart decision and that rankles certain people.
"Depraved"??? Hill's an idiot. "Stupid", "cowardly", "no convictions", maybe so (depending on your politics), but "depraved". I think Hill should be careful, that word has sexual overtones. I guess he's still using his opening snide remark approach in his so-called reports. I had hoped he had developed some small iota of courtesy and decency, but no. Perhaps Hill is indecent!!
Is it just me,or does this guy get more annoying as time goes on?
"hypocritical and depraved" ??
He needs a serious attitude adjustment!
Mr.Perfect.
I wonder if there are any skeletons in HIS closet?
The fact of the matter is that the Liberals handed over to Mr. Harper a country which had wrestled the deficits into seven consecutive surpluses - the only G7 country that had no deficits !!! Mr. Paul Martin as Liberal finance minister left a legacy of financial astuteness that is unmatched by any other industrialized country in the world!

How easy it is now for the Conservatives to enjoy the fruits of the preceding years of Liberal good fiscal management! How else would they be able to spend lavishly on billions of dollars worth of war making equipment, cutting the GST and so forth???

Get real, Mr. Hill, you want to elevate yourself by bashing the opposition which is according to you, led by a leader who thrives on hypocrisy and depravity!

Boy, Ottawa sure does strange things to some people!

Whatever happened to respect, civility, honesty and just plain common courtesy?

According to Monty Python "the hallowed halls of Parliament have been overrun by twits."

Excellent post by Mr. Hill.

"Mr. Paul Martin as Liberal finance minister left a legacy of financial astuteness that is unmatched by".. Really!, maybe for those who are not very well informed and do not understand the full story. The facts are: Mr. Martin reduced payments to the provinces in the same amounts that he reduced the deficit, in reality causing an equal increase in the provinces deficits/debt, he transferred the deficit. He was anything but astute , he was deceptive, dishonsest and deceitful, the only thing he was "famous" for was in being named by the Highly respeced world publication , "the Economist" as a 'ditherer', hence his much deserved nickname Mr. Dithers..

I read in a column today the excellent suggestion that Mr. Dion's dog 'Kyoto' be renamed "Ole Yeller".

Lewis

I couldn't respond as fast as Lewis but the comments are spot on. Martin balanced the budgets by a Conservative implemented GST(which they campaigned to eliminate)and cuts to provincial transfer payments. Diplomat, name me one thing Martin did besides the above items that warrant such praise. The conservatives are enjoying the fruits of sound Liberal fiscal management??? Good grief. What planet did you beam in from.
Martin didn't do what Mr. Mulroney's government did year after year, namely running the biggest deficits in Canada's history, one year alone adding 60 Billion dollars to the national debt!

According to Mr. Mulroney the GST was a) going to eliminate deficit spending - and it did not, or b) be completely revenue neutral - and it wasn't, of course.

Martin put a stop to the deficit spending. Finance ministers from other G7 countries adopted some of Mr. Martin's policies to their own fiscal management standards.

"What planet did you beam in from."

I can ask you the same question! My memory is better than yours, that's all.

Mr. Hill's comments would be funny if they wouldn't be so borderline idiotic and pathetic!

Over and out - I'm off to my *other* planet, relax.



You're right, Mr. Hill. The Conservatives were an effective opposition to the governing Liberals. Maybe the Canadian people will be better served if you returned to that role, as you're not doing a whole hell of a lot for us right now.

Diplomat. Your thinking is somewhat flawed when it comes to the Liberals and especially the **not so bright** Paul (Shipping Magnate) Martin.

It was Paul Martin who for years kept the Unemployment Insurance fees high, raked is something like $ 40 Billion dollars and used this money to balance the budget. Between the money he stole from Canadian workers, and employers through the EI Funds, he also had the GST plus the reduction in transfer payments. So in effect he was not a **genius** at all. To make matters more interesting, John Chretian, now says that Paul Martin was Finiance Mininster in name only, and that all the decisions were made by him. If this is so the Paul was in fact a ditherer.

I notice that the EI fees are still high and the new conservative finiance minister is raking in the dough, however they have given some money back by reducing the GST to 6% with another 1% reduction coming soon. Plus there will be other decreases in taxes.

Hill should pull in his horns as he is making it more and more difficult to vote for him, and his party. More work and less gab would be the order of the day.
Good points, Palopu, but Chretien and Martin never saw eye to eye on anything, so I would treat anything that Chretien says about Martin with a healthy amount of suspicion.

To eliminate the deficit spending and balance the budgets some really tough measures had to be taken, obviously. Have you any idea how this could have been done without some severe belt tightening?

I am not aware that the Conservatives have restored the transfer payments to the provinces to pre-Martin levels or that they have stopped *stealing* from the Canadian workers by drastically lowering or eliminating their EI contributions.

We still have the GST, Mulroney's *revenue neutral* brain child.

Mr. Hill's comments have become ever more shrill and sound more and more like American election attack style propaganda which relies on the impact of being totally negative and usually pitifully inaccurate!

I can't understand why he doesn't just bask in the warm glory if his and his leader's tremendous accomplishments and refrain from using his famous snide remarks tactics.

To accuse the leader of the official opposition of *astoundingly hypocritical and depraved* actions and behaviour is...well,...it's a new low.

Perhaps it can prompt some undecided voters to join the Liberal Party and thereby serve a useful purpose.

Cheers!











So, who is "afraid" of an election, the Liberals who can bring down the government but won't do it for a number of reasons, or the COnservatives who can call an election anytime they wish, and ALSO do not want it for perhapse very similar reasons - they are not ready because they are scared shitless, and maybe even because they do not want to incur the expense at this time. I doubt the latter though. If they thought they were stronger than they were, they would have called one right after the throne speech.

This is a game of political poker, nothing more, nothing less, and Mr. Hill is playing out his part of the game right here in front of us.
Men who are engaged in politics must necessarily aim at reducing opposition to a minimum, and one of the most obvious means to that end is by misrepresenting, discrediting or ruining their opponents.

The politician chooses his menace as he does his party, his principles, his clothing, his manner of living. That is, he chooses a menace that will be approved by his constituents.

Men play at being God, but lacking God's experience they wind up as politicians.

Talk about the pots calling the kettles black. Read your own posts and tell me if your comments are any different than the one you criticize? Chester