Friendship Lodge Gets Green Light from Council
By 250 News
Councillors vote in favour of changes to allow construction of Friendship Lodge
Prince George City Council has approved the changes necessary to proceed with the construction of Friendship Lodge.
(at right, Architectural rendering of Friendship Lodge)
Council voted in favour of the two recommendations presented by City Staff, the first called for a revision to the Official Community plan so it will read: “Portions of Queensway are also suitable for higher density multi-family”. The second recommendation called for the rezoning of the property at Queensway and 17th to allow for non-profit housing.
The final vote was 6 in favour and three against. (click on video icon for video of vote)
Here is how the Councillors voted, and their comments:
Mayor Kinsley: FOR the OCP ammendment because he believes this will be an asset and will not take away from the neighbourhood as suggested. "The fears that often accompany any kind of change are often unfounded, and I beleive in my heart that will be the case here as well."
Councillor Murry Krause: FOR : "I am not in a conflict of interest." "We have got to stop usimg emergemcy wards, shelters and jails as a way of dealing with the homeless" He says residents are expresing fear, but says research shows once such facilities are operating, there is no impact on safety, or on property values. "The facility will be owned by BC Housing it will be attractive and landscaped. " He says it will also be well run, pointing to the positive aspects of the Native Friendship Centre’s projects.
Councilor Glenn Scott: Against "We’ve heard a lot from the Miller Connaught area, it deserves to be saved not descimated " Scott says he went back to the neighbourhood and says it is one of the most attractive neighbourhoods in the City. The concept is right, in my mind the location is wrong.We are elected by the citizens to work on their behalf, we can’t loose site that we have to listen to he citizens. " he pointed to the petition of hundreds of names opposing the project as the voice he would listen to.
Councillor Don Zurowski:. FOR says many of the people who will live there are the same folks who live in the basement suite next door. "This is change, and change can be positive. There is nothing we can do today to alleviate the fears of the neghbourhood." In my view this is a soution not a silver bullet, it won’t solve it all, and there needs to more of this kind of work done."
Councillor Brian Skakun: AGAINST I do not support this application,I am as compasionate as anyone else, but I do not support this project. He pointed to the proposal for Baldy Hughes. where hookers won’t be plying their trade at their front door or crack sellers, selling drugs on their doorstep. " This neighbourhood has put up with way more than it should have to for the past ten years. I believe residents should have a say on how their neighbourhood is developed "
Councillor Shirley Gratton: FOR "This is the hardest decision I have had to make , and I will reluctantly be supporting this project."
Councillor Deborah Munoz: FOR "Whenever possible proponents should select a site which is already appropriately zoned." She says there is a demand for affordable housing, but there is no supply. "I will support this project on the basis that everyone deserves a good home."
Councillor Sherry Sethen: AGAINST While she believes the project is needed, she desn’t believe enough information has been given. She didn’t feel the questions she had , had been answered. "I do not believe this project, governed under the landlord tenant act is the way to look after the project."
Councillor Don Bassermann: FOR "Socially there is a need, socially there is a need to walk the talk." Bassermann says Councillors are elected to represent the citizens and that includes the disenfranchised.
Many of the residents who oppose the facility were on hand for the Council decision. They are not surprised by Council’s approval as they had argued from the very beginnning that , despite Mayor Kinsley’s statement to the contrary, they believed this was a done deal.
One resident remarked on his way out of Council Chambers "Why should we taxpayers expect anything from Council? They never listen to us."
Joanne MacMillan, spokesman for the Millar/Connaught Citizen’sCommittee says the Committee is completely "disatisfied, and in complete disagreement with Council. It shows they really don’t know the scope of the whole project and did not have all the information."
Previous Story - Next Story
Return to Home
Get a lawyer. The city wants it, then they got to pay.