Clear Full Forecast

Canada�s Road Safety Vision

By Submitted Article

Sunday, February 17, 2008 04:36 AM

   
by Glen Nicholson
The Canada Safety Council reports that fewer than 5% of Canadians have heard of Canada’s Road Safety Vision 2010, a plan endorsed in 2000 by all Federal and Provincial transport ministers to make Canada’s roads “the safest in the world by 2010.” 
Vision 2010 will fail.  It targets the usual road safety factors: drinking and driving, seat belts, etc.  However, thanks to the immense investment of public resources, there is little room left for improvement in these areas.  Programs aimed at changing driving behaviour have largely saturated the audience.  For example, seat belts, which save more lives than any other automotive device, are already used by about 95% of Canadians.
Vision 2010 has the ambitious target of reducing reduce road fatalities and injuries by 30% by 2010.  This will not happen without an innovative new approach.  Fortunately, there is a solution.  It is called Electronic Stability Control (“ESC”).
ESC is a computerized system that helps drivers control their vehicles by detecting skids and then applying brakes and/or reducing engine power.  ESC could prevent about one third of all crashes.  ESC costs manufacturers only $111 per vehicle and could prevent:

•                     40% of single vehicle crashes;
•                     43% of fatal vehicle crashes; and
•                     77-80% of fatal vehicle rollovers.   
Canada will not achieve the Vision 2010 target of the “safest roads in the world” because few Canadians know about ESC and no government has taken effective steps to bring it to the attention of the Canadian public.
Other countries have embraced ESC.  By simply raising public awareness, the Swedish government boosted voluntary ESC purchases to 93% of new vehicles.  Germany and other nordic European nations have similar high rates of ESC use.
The UK, Australia, and New Zealand are also promoting ESC awareness and there are ESC programs in Japan, China, India, and the mid-East.  Many countries (including Canada) participated in the CHOOSE ESC! conference in Rome last May, launching an international campaign to reach consumers with ESC information.
The United States seized upon ESC as “the greatest life saving technology since the safety belt.”  A new US regulation will start phasing in ESC as a mandatory feature in all new passenger cars, trucks, and SUV’s starting with 55% of new light vehicles next year, increasing that number annually to 75%, 95% and 100%.
Unfortunately, ESC awareness in Canada is very low.  Transport Canada found that only 1% of Canadians named ESC as a safety device.  Even though ESC is available in over 200 vehicle models from all auto makers, only about 5% of vehicles on Canadian roads have ESC.  Many Canadian owners of ESC are not even aware they have it, what it is, or how it works.
Transport Canada has ESC information on its website, but has not formally announced an ESC law.  It is expected that ESC will not be mandated in Canada until 2012.  When Liberal Opposition Transport Critic, Joe Volpe realized how slowly the government was moving, he introduced a private member’s bill on ESC.  Ironically, Quebec already has the world’s first ESC law; however, it only applies to carriers of dangerous goods.
Viviane Reding of the European Commission declared, "Time is short.  Each new car that is sold without ESC is a lost opportunity to save lives and reduce suffering."  These non-ESC vehicles will be dangerous hazards on our roads for the next 15-25 years (if they are not eliminated by crashing).
Canada could achieve the Vision 2010 target if all Canadians had ESC.  Consumer’s Union says you should not buy a vehicle without ESC.  You can help.  Inform yourself about ESC.  Make sure your next vehicle has ESC.  Tell your friends about ESC.
For more information, including videos showing how ESC works, look up “Electronic Stability Control” in Wikipedia at this link: 
 
Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

How about driving to the road conditions and the posted speed limits!!!
"...Canada�s Road Safety Vision 2010, a plan endorsed in 2000 by all Federal and Provincial transport ministers to make Canada�s roads �the safest in the world by 2010.�"

Anything that is started with such hyperbole as "safest in the world" may just turn people off altogether as it seems quite unattainable from the start!

How about setting attainable yearly goals, work toward those and check every once in a while to verify how Canada's record compares to international statistics?

Eventually it may become a global success story amongst all the other efforts to be "first in the world" that have failed and are never heard from again...

I'm sorry, I'm getting tired of these ESC articles. Been there done that.

Learn how to drive properly in the first place.
If everyone learned to drive properly, drove to road conditions, and drove within posted speed limits, would we have zero crashes?
Before you answer, watch this video.
http://www.howsafeisyourcar.com.au/electronic-stability-control.php
Owl: "Learn how to drive properly in the first place."

Wise words, indeed! Don't tailgate...it is according to ICBC the most hated, irritating and annoying habit on the roads today! Even ESC is not a cure for it!

I don't know why the government doesn't tell the industry that it has six weeks to install it in all new vehicles - if it is indeed such a great invention. Why does everything that involves the government have to take years instead of weeks?

Answer: Job security.

"Canada�s Road Safety Vision 2010"? Is this another aproach to polish our image for the olympics? 2010 seems to be some kind of "buzz" number lately. What number do we push for after 2010? And yes i get the point about ESC!! But im not going to rush out and spend money on it. If it comes stock in my new vehicle then great!Its a bonus! but until then im compitant in driving the road conditions. And even if i had ESC its not going to change the way i drive. Lets put the dead horse to rest now. Im getting a little fishy about glens motive here.. He's pushing pretty hard to promote this product. I want more backgound info and crediblity on this guy because hes starting to sound more like a salesman by every article he submits.. No personal punches to glen here just tell us who your working for and why your targeting ESC when there are alot of other driving issues you could be working on that directly relate to us.
Seat belts save more lives than any other device. Seat belts were invented in 1849, patented in 1885, and installed in cars in the 1920's. Yet the first seat belt installation law was in 1964 and the first seat belt use law was in 1970 (Victoria, Australia). The BC Government did not get around to legislating seat belts for workers until 2007! That�s why I am not waiting for governments to lead the way with ESC.

Fortunately, governments are moving faster on ESC. In 2005, Quebec had the first ESC law, only a decade after it was first installed in production cars. The US ESC law takes effect this September. The UN will likely publish a global ESC regulation this year. Victoria (Australia) and Canada have proposed ESC laws for 2011.

Meanwhile, dealers still sell and buyers still buy dangerous vehicles without ESC. No one is forcing you to replace your car now. But when you do, you can choose from over 200 models with ESC.

Northman, you can Google me. If I was a politician, bureaucrat, or car dealer, you could question my motives. However, I am promoting ESC awareness for free because I believe in it. And Opinion 250 was kind enough to help because Ben Meisner has been to crash scenes.

http://www.princegeorgecitizen.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=105366&Itemid=159
Ok that makes it clear now. no more questions from me. Cheers!
"From 1987 to 1992, Mercedes-Benz and Robert Bosch GmbH co-developed a system called Elektronisches Stabilit�tsprogramm (ger."electronic stability programme" trademarked as ESP) a lateral slippage control system, the first Electronic Stability Control (ESC)."

It's been around for that long and why hasn't the government made it mandatory in all these years?
How about building safer roads. Hwy 16 and Domano now there is a piece of work. Whoever designed that should hang their head in shame. There is a serious accident there almost every week.
I think we have a lot of dangerous left hand turn lanes off of highways that are not marked, have no lighting, and have no turning lanes that provide access to and from major highways with traffic flowing at highways speeds often in blowing snow or other conditions that can suddenly obscure vision where sudden braking could do more harm than good. These cause numerous potential problems... some not even directly related to the vehicle entering or exiting one of these locations.

Also I think it should be law that the four-way warning lights on the vehicle should be used when decelerating in a through lane for a left hand turn from a highway. Confussion of intentions or lack of warning could and often can turn deadly.
"If everyone learned to drive properly, drove to road conditions, and drove within posted speed limits, would we have zero crashes?"

Its called the four E's

E=engineer
E=Educate
E=Enforce
E=Evaluate

The system should be set up so that if all four work properly, there would be zero accidents. That is the measure of the effectiveness of the system.

As with any system there is a state of equilibrium which is achieved.

The design (engineering) of the vehicles, the roads, the education system and the enforcement system, as well as the adherence to those designs is important.

The telling words you wrote, Glen, are these:
"Meanwhile, dealers still sell and buyers still buy dangerous vehicles without ESC"

Note the word dangerous. Something has gone wrong with the "design" side of vehicles. Top heavy vehicles, and vehicles which carry far too many passengers for someone with a level 5 drivers license to drive (a lack of the E=education component) have come on the scene thus increasing the sheer number of, as you put it, "dangerous" vehicles, and as I put it, "uneducated" drivers on the road.

So we try to offset that with a little electroninc device and drivers, rather than becoming more cautious with those verhicles, become more complacent.

Those in charge of public safety screwed up the system by changing the state of equilibrium. Someone invented a device to offset that.

The scientific and safety engineer's question is:

What would be the effect if we:

1. got back to safer designs for vehicles based on such characteristics as lower centre of gravity and wider footprint; longer wheelbases for extended vans, etc.;

2. required a higher qualification for drivers license for those carrying more than 6 people in a vehicle.

Once we get back to that level of safety which used to be there, then let's look at other things which would get reduce accidents and the severity of accidents, including electroninc devices. ESC is only one of those electronic devices.

As diplomat so diplomatically puts it, tailgating can be another problem. There are devices which identify when one is approaching another object and warn you.

So link that to the speed the vehicle is going and the acceleration of the vehicle similar to cruise control and tailgating will be gone. Or so some might think.

Have fun trying to pass on a highway.

;-)


Title Blaming Drivers for Vehicle Stbility by Harvey McFadden




I have been following Glen Nicholson's articles on Electronic Stability Control and I would like to applaud his recognition of problems with vehicle stability.

It is easy to blame drivers for accidents: going too fast for conditions, not leaving enough stopping room, or not learning how to correct a skid. It is always the driver�s fault. But what about the car?

Many tire sellers give bad advice, saying the better tires should always go on the front. In fact, the better tires should go on the light end. Many cars have very uneven weight distribution, with good tires located in the wrong place.

The most unbalanced cars have four times the number of accidents that other cars do. On some cars, simply rotating tires front to rear can double the chance of a loss-of- control accident. Some cars that feel the safest with all the weight on the front have the most fatalities.

What if rally and ice race drivers that endorse tires had to share the track with transport trucks and moose? Some tires and tire arrangements can limit stopping and steering in bad conditions.

What if car handling tests were be done by the professionals with three kids in the car and one ice cream cone, one water pistol, and one nerf bat? A moment's distraction can be critical when driving an unstable car.

Understanding, choosing, installing, and maintaining safety equipment such as tires requires drivers to attend to their equipment as they are supposed to attend to driving carefully.

If you cannot brake and steer going down hill at the same time and if you are afraid to plow through a ridge of slush to avoid oncoming traffic then you need to find a tire seller that understands weight distribution and how to correct it with traction balance.