Studio 2880 Days Numbered?
By 250 News
Tuesday, February 12, 2008 03:59 AM
Prince George, B.C.- It won't happen this year, maybe not in 2009, but one thing is clear, Studio 2880's days are numbered.
The status of the ailing facility on 15th Avenue was brought up during the Civic Facilities budget discussion at City Hall.
Councilor Shirley Gratton wanted to know what, if anything, would be done about the condition of the building.
Leisure Services Manager, Tom Madden says it is likely the residents of that facility will be asked to move into the old RCMP building when the new RCMP building is ready. That is expected to happen in early to mid 2010.
"There's always been this dialogue in the commu ity about the potential reuse of it ( the old RCMP building) for community groups and a couple have come forward over time. We have had conversations with numerous executives of Studio 2880, the Community Arts Council Board about that potential. There has certaily been no decisions made but there are lots of desires around something like that."
Madden says there is interest in trying to bring more cultural types of services into the downtown core. That would tie in to the possibility of a Performing Arts Centre downtown. "I think that is something we need to consider. The location of a performing arts centre is certainly preferred in the downtown area and if we can attract more cultural kinds of activities to come and be around it, then we have a cultrual district that's formed." He says if the sites are too far apart it might not work as well.
The question about 2880's future hangs on how much the City wants to pump into the older building. "Its not purpose built, its been renovated to meet some of their needs and I think its time we begin to look for a new home for them."
The changes would be a few years away, as there is nothing in the budget for renovations to the old RCMP building. "We didn't want to get into the discussions about what's the use of the old RCMP building until we had a concrete plan to build a new facility and it was underway and funded and we were moving forward. Now we can start those discussions and see where they take us."
.
Previous Story - Next Story
Return to Home
If you think about it that is always where this city builds with public dollars... we even located the cities main fire hall at the lowest point on the flood plain.
IMO private money is not as dumb about these kinds of things, and that is why we see huge public dollars subsidizing the concept of downtown in all sorts of public dollar buildings... with each one being proclaimed the final piece to the puzzle to bring it all together and create the critical mass that will bring the private investors to the downtown. Its not going to happen... private money wants to invest where their investment has low risk and good outlook for future opportunities and synergies.
Not only do projects in the downtown have to work with a flood plain risk, but they also by that very fact have to build parking above ground, and thus limiting any future growth in capacity of the downtown vicinity. At best the downtown could hope to transform, but its growth potential is limited due to natural barriers. Clearly this winters’ ice jam should highlight the ground water peculation issues that are at the heart of the natural barriers to significant growth.
With the above to consider I think it would be throwing good money after bad if we follow tradition and build another single public building in the 200-year flood plain.
If the PAC is to become an approved tax-payer expenditure… then I propose it at least be considered in a location where a new urban opportunity could take root as a central area of the city that has the capacity to grow into a true urban focal point.
I like the idea of developing the area between the Brick and Pine Centre as a new urban renewal area with good potential for investors that want to invest in an area with high growth potential as an urban core. The area around the university would be another such area with that kind of potential but the current city council seems to like the idea of privatizing the viewscape of the hill to private home owners. Both areas have infrastructure capabilities as well as the ability to build parking underground, which should be the first two most important building blocks we look at before emotion or following past failed trends when looking to spark urban renewal.
Time Will Tell