Clear Full Forecast

City Brass, Mayor And Council AWOL In River Rd. Protest

By Ben Meisner

Monday, April 14, 2008 03:45 AM

        

While the City Council, Mayor included ,stayed away from the protest for the River Road Berm on Saturday, they might do well to remember two things

First, those people standing at the intersection were not a bunch of malcontents.  There were business owners of companies that employee hundreds of people, the United Steel workers who represent a large portion of the working population, and for good measure, a lot of just ordinary folks who tuned out to offer their support.

Secondly, we do know with absolute certainty that the Province did not tell the City to keep the berm in place contrary to what the city hall brass were trying to make us believe. Pat Bell put that myth to bed rather soundly lately and there was a lot of talk about that as the people stood at the intersection of 5th and Carney.

So where does that leave the City? 

Well the Mayor's Office, the Office of the City Manager and finally and most importantly ,those who are seeking re election in the next six months  make the call.  If they haven’t been keeping up with what has been going on along River Rd, they don’t deserve to have a seat at the city table. If they haven’t been asking questions about what is going on it is their respective jobs to do just that, and so far they have dropped the ball.

The Province has made it quite clear; they will get the Gabion dikes removed just as soon as the frost is out of the ground. They quite clearly know what they are doing and they have made it painfully clear that they did not, nor did anyone in their organization, tell the City to keep River Rd as a berm for the spring flood.

We do know that a study being conducted by the city into flooding along the river could take upwards of 14 months and that means the results will roll in after the next election, about 6 months too late for a host of the Councilors who had adopted a rather strange attitude of late that they don’t need to represent the people of the city.

Colin Kinsley, I believe, has been watching the tide to see if the water doesn’t get too high, that he may be able to take another run at the Mayor’s job. His job shadow, Don Zurowski, at this point in the game would need huge support to get him anywhere near the office that he so desperately hopes to capture.

They, along with the rest of Council, may find that the memory of the voting public can indeed extend past six months.

I’m Meisner and that’s one man’s Opinion


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

Some heads are gona roll..
The unfortunate thing is heads are not going to roll as I doubt there is going to be enough new candidates to choose from. The people who are in there at present, if all ran for council again, would get in again, unless some great newcomer comes along.

Ben has already stated he wouldn't run for Mayor ( hmmmm, but did that rule out as a councilor ? ).

Does anyone have any leads on someone new ?
Sad but true, probably won't have enough candidates for a clean slate. Hopefully Kinsley retires, and ye gads, we don't get stuck with donnie Zee as mayor, ugh!
metalman.
GRAVEL REMOVAL is the only thing that will prevent future flooding.
What's to study?
These people are a bunch of idiots.
When you dam a river the water stops flowing and you get a lake behind it.DUH.
Get rid of the dam and the water will flow freely and there will not be flooding. Doesn't sound like rocket science to me.
I think the protest was against the Mayor and Council and even the Administration.

So, would they join in the demonstration???? I would think not.

Would they come out to speak to them? And say what? "we're working on it" ... "we are removing the gravel at the end of April"

They have nothing to say. They have no PR person that knows how to handle the issue. They have no administrator who can handle the situation. They have no Council that can handle the situation.

They are loosing the community's confidence on some of the major issues facing this community.

river road .... cameron street bridge .... roads .... energy plant .... golf course lands ...... heavy industry sites ..... air quality ...... dangerous goods routes ..... unSMART growth all over the place ...

one controversy after another .......
If you ask me kinsley just does not care.
He is busy packing his suit case for a tax dollar paid holiday to china..............
lunarbase there were something like 24 candidates running in the last election - result no new faces.

Read "UNBC voters would have elected different city counci" (including Mayor)
Jan. 12th, 2006.
"The unfortunate thing is heads are not going to roll as I doubt there is going to be enough new candidates to choose from."

The problem is that the last time there wer too many to choose from. On top of that, people tend to fill up their ballots when they could be voting for just one or 3 or 5 ...

With a seas of candidates, the incumbents will rise to the surface virtually all the time.

8 seats, say 6 incumbents running and 8 new ones for a total of 14 and there is a fighting chance to get now only the two vacant seats filled with new blood, but also 2+ additional new Councillors. That would means 50%+ will be new.

The same goes with the mayor. There were too many new faces on the mayorality race the last time. Even though they took few votes, if there hads only been two in the race, the votes to change mayor may have gone to Rogers.

So, hope for a healthy new slate, but not one single person more than 8 new faces. Otherwise we will have the majority of incubants returned.

Isn't democracy fun?
All will be forgiven, forgotten and excused by the (usually ill-informed) voters when the grand photo op shows them all lined up and giving a huge smiling thumbs-up in front of the bustling Cameron Street Bridge construction site - the bridge that should have been simply and immediately repaired for less than three quarters of a million bucks, the bridge that will now set the taxpayer back by a cool ten million and counting.

Isn't ruling fun?

It would be a miracle if our elected council actually did what we wanted after the election. The people we need to be made accountable is the administration. They are the people who actually run the city. Who are they answering to when the mayor is busy packing? The city directors, are they accountable? How are thier departments running? Rumor has it that they are fireproof.
"They are loosing the community's confidence on some of the major issues facing this community.

river road .... cameron street bridge .... roads .... energy plant .... golf course lands ...... heavy industry sites ..... air quality ...... dangerous goods routes ..... unSMART growth all over the place ..."

That is what is simply astonishing to me. You can see there being differences of opinion on the odd issue, however, it seems like they are completely out of touch with what the majority of the population wants, on almost EVERY significant issue.

What's even more amuzing is that not one of the "senior" councillors have taken a real leadership stance on any of the main issues. They all seem to be perfectly content with the status quo. That's the deal breaker for me. If you aren't willing to stand up and be a leader during these times, you aren't getting my support.
Anyone think to bring a shovel and some asphalt and fill in a pothole or two within sight of the protest? Coulda been nice. Maybe next time. Maybe.
Re senior councillors.... At least one of them is a wanna be mayor. He ain't gettin my support.
"If you aren't willing to stand up and be a leader during these times, you aren't getting my support."

BINGO!!!!!!! ...
Hear hear owl! May I remind everyone of the reason for forming a community group? Please read. Take note of the date:

http://www.opinion250.com/blog/view/8061/3/buisnesses%20on%20river%20road%20will%20put%20up%20$1%20million%20dollars%20to%20move%20city%20berms

So ya, I am frustrated too.