Liberals vs Teachers
Sunday, October 16, 2005 03:45 AM
by Jack deWit
Until now I have been silent on the teachers dispute with their employers and now the courts. However, recent developments have raised questions as to how and why these parties have reached a stalemate in negotiations.
We must remember that it was years ago when government altered the bargaining procedures used to negotiate with teachers so that the teachers fell under one bargaining umbrella and one set of negotiations. I suppose it seemed simplistic at the time but it neglected to take into account the demographics of the province. Educational situations are much different in Victoria than they are in Dease Lake, Fort Nelson, or Wells. In smaller communities schools are physically much different from those in the large urban areas. The same applies to the teachers who must work under much different stress values than those in the lower Fraser Valley schools.
The provincial government has shifted many financial and operating obligations onto local school boards. Conversely, negotiating salaries for teachers was stripped from these boards with the result that Victoria becomes the employer and the school boards simply become liaisons without input when dealing with salary issues. Yet, it is the boards that must work within the constraints of the provincial government guidelines to find a working relationship with teachers meet the standards of education that every student is entitled to.
So if the provincial government, no matter of which affiliation, initially broke the structure, should we not expect them to repair it? In my opinion,
for the Liberals to pass a bill to make it illegal for teachers to negotiate an agreement (a strike being a last resort in the collective bargaining
process) is simply a manipulative move to save on salary expenditures and slide those funds into general revenue in the education ministry. What an original methodology to finance the desperately needed textbooks! How long must teachers disobey the court ruling to reach the Liberal’s goal? After all, it was the option of the court to penalize the BCTF with huge fines. By setting aside fines and by freezing the assets of the BCTF, prolonging the strike becomes more of a public relations issue. The government, you might say, has handed their share of the controversy to the courts. Hey, just what the Liberals wanted in the first place.
There has been ample time for the bargaining mechanism to have been restructured so that a province wide strike could have been averted. Now with both sides hunkered down, each with their principles and convictions, the strike drags on indefinitely.
The losers are:
1. the students who desperately require a high standard of education to compete in today’s rapidly changing society.
2. the teachers who are loosing wages and time applying their profession.
3. the Liberals who are certainly going to lose support from an important group in our communities.
4. the parents and grandparents who have to adjust their schedule to supervise the kids.
If everyone in this dispute is a loser, why are the combatants not sitting at the table negotiating a settlement? What are we teaching our children by sacrificing their education? Surely the government could find some incentive to negotiate even if the “illegal” strike continues. After all, they are the party that made it illegal in the first place.
Previous Story - Next Story
Return to Home
in another forum the point has been made that teachers do not work on Saturday and Sunday, so if Bond and De Jong negotiated with them over this weekend they would not be violating the governments insistence that teachers return to work. It is now Sunday, and it looks like that opportunity has been fritted away. I think that is a pity and shows very poor leadership by Bond and De Jong. It still could be done.