Clear Full Forecast

Summit Lake-Kitimat Pipeline Gets Green Light From Province

By 250 News

Friday, June 27, 2008 03:47 PM

 

VICTORIA - Pacific Trail Pipelines Limited Partnership

has received an environmental assessment (EA) certificate for the

Kitimat-Summit Lake Pipeline project. Environment Minister Barry Penner

and Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources Minister Richard Neufeld made

their decision to grant the EA certificate after considering a

comprehensive review led by B.C.'s Environmental Assessment Office.

 

      The project consists of the construction and operation of a

463-kilometre, 91-centimetre diameter buried pipe between Kitimat and

Summit Lake, including one new compressor station along the proposed

system that will connect with the existing Pacific Northern Gas Ltd.

natural gas pipeline and convey natural gas from the proposed Kitimat

Liquefied Natural Gas (KLNG) terminal to the Spectra Energy gas

transmission system.

 

      In addition to the provincial EA, the project also requires

approvals under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act. A harmonized

review led by B.C.'s Environmental Assessment Office (EAO) was initiated

in accordance with the Canada/British Columbia Agreement for

Environmental Assessment Cooperation. The federal environmental

assessment process is ongoing.

 

      Before the project may proceed, the proponent must also obtain the

necessary provincial and federal permits and authorizations.

 

The provincial environmental assessment certificate contains numerous

commitments that the proponent must implement throughout various stages

of the project. Key commitments include the following:

 

* Assess the erosion potential of soils and implement adequate erosion

controls.

* Mitigate potential loss or degradation of instream fish habitat.

* Monitor water quality in the Morice Water Management Area.

* Develop a hydrostatic test plan to manage discharge water quality,

temperature and withdrawal volumes.

* Mitigate potential effects to wildlife and wildlife habitat.

* Manage public access into previously inaccessible areas.

 

      Capital costs for the Kitimat-Summit Lake Pipeline Project are

estimated at $1.1 billion. The project will cross provincial and local

government jurisdictions. Once the project is in operation, it is

estimated that the proponent will pay at least $74 million in provincial

and local government taxes over the anticipated 50-year life of the

pipeline. The project is expected to create approximately 1,200-1,500

jobs over a 24-month clearing and construction phase.


Previous Story - Next Story



Return to Home
NetBistro

Comments

this is very good news for the North
but how long to go through the various assessment stages
One step closer! I am guessing work to start 2010? lol...or maybe they will get approval in the fall session so they can begin work late spring '09. That way Gordo can try to claim credit for this project that has been in the works for at least a decade! lol

Either way, it is good news though. Maybe we'll get cheaper fuel? Nah! We have refineries here and still get gouged!
BC should develop[ an energy plan before it starts to natural gas. It should be used for domestic purposes and development of industry in BC. Gordo says we should be self sufficient in energy but then he exports it. And will those companies pay the gas tax on this petroleum product? Another decision made for the companies and not the province.
how many pernament jobs? Good news overall.
Good News Indeed! How soon can we start?
Gee I don't know - will gas give me heart burn? We shouldn't have to put up with heart burn just for a few jobs. Is this Gordo's fault that I might get gas? Will I need an emergency plan?
Hope it has no ill effects on summit lake.
When you read this pipeline company's website you will realise that this pipeline is to primarily import and unlikely serve as an export system for natural gas.
It is being built mainly to bring liquified natural gas shipped TO Canada and then piped to the Alberta Tar sands.

Holee molee check out the numbers involved with the natural gas required by the tar sands! This is a mind boggling equation of how much natural gas will be burnt to convert the tar sands into petroleum products like gasoline, diesel etc.

To put this into perspective, I don't think that BC can produce 3.5 BILLION cubic feet of natural gas PER DAY, and this is the estimated DAILY requirements for just the tar sands.I believe that this demand for the burning of imported natural gas (because we cannot produce enough of our own) should make people wonder a little. Wonder a lot actually.

It seems to me that there is also a mind boggling moral-ethical-environmental-economic equation and perhaps a huge contradiction in doing this.

If there is any legitamacy to imposing a carbon tax on BC consumers (intended to change the public's behaviour)then how can there be legitimacy in participating in something like this?

Who's behaviour needs fixing?
First Nations will shut it down.
Sadly, I think AC is right. This is only a permit regarding the practical aspects of the pipeline. Now that everyone knows it can be built, which is a no-brainer, the "soft science" black-mailers show up next.
If first nations doesent, the enviro-nazis will.
If it is done properly with the right enviromental controls,I like it!
Now wait for the protests to start!
When this project goes before the canadian environmental assessment board, I think the wheels are going to fall off.
The feds are too committed to "green" to let this project happen.

Aside from the desperately needed work this short term construction project could provide, the long run is a much bigger question.

The adverse effects are not so much what occurs in BC, but what happens in Alberta.

I believe that the only energy source which will be provided to the tar sands will come from nuclear plants.
There is no other way to generate so much energy required without producing carbon emmissions.

You have to think that if this much increase in demand for natural gas occurrs
....won't we just expect to see the price of natural gas to skyrocket like crude has?

Is this pipeline a cheaper alternative to the alaska hwy pipeline?
Is this pipeline a cheaper alternative to the mackenzie valley pipeline?
"..Is this pipeline a cheaper alternative to the alaska hwy pipeline?
Is this pipeline a cheaper alternative to the mackenzie valley pipeline?.."

I've worked on both those projects for many years. Both projects are dying from runaway costs and politics. Both have no practical construction issues or technical risks. Just politics and greed from clever people.

More ice free days in the arctic will cause some re-thinking on shipping as well.
Ice free days in the arctic? Haven't you heard of icecap.com? I thought that warming thing was all B.S.?????